Put your $ where your mouth is. Show me the documentation of 137 who saw 77 hit the building. And please, spare me the individuals who worked for the pentagon. They have the same agenda as Rumsfeld and others.
137??? I don't remember any document listing that that many eyewitnesses make that claim. I do know there are several that contradict the claim but the OCT huggers don't want to acknowledge any eyewitnesses who might contradict or put into question the OCT and there are definitely well over 100 of those, all documented.
I agree Bob. There are not 137 people who claimed to have seen 77 hit the building. Maybe there is one, and he was a civilian who worked at the pentagon. The Citizens Investigation Team, CIT, interviewed people who had seen any airplane at all, and did a good job with it. Nobody saw the airliner strike the building. Because it didn't.
Well no one claims to have seen AA77 hit the building because that would be impossible since no plane was ever externally marked AA77. But if I remember correctly several eyewitnesses claim to have seen a large airliner hit the building. There are also eyewitnesses who claim that explosions took out the building and other eyewitnesses who claim there was far too little debris that adds up to a large airliner. The point is there are eyewitnesses of all kinds but there is NO official investigation that incorporates ALL the eyewitnesses and that goes for the entirety of the 9/11 events. And that's just one of thousands of factors that render all of these official investigations a complete farce. From what I saw on video the CIT team did do a thorough job interviewing quite a few eyewitnesses who contradict or put into serious question the official narrative.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html Employees were a small amount, Some were on the lawn, but most worked elsewhere, even bums on the benches saw it.
LOLOL There were thousands who saw it, but they only documented 137, overkill in itself. Just making the statement one or two, on a busy afternoon, indicates you people didn't study this at all.
If you really studied this you would know their complete Testimonies, along with their names and addresses are on file.
As was brought up, if ten people see a car wreck, you will get ten different versions, and the small details here are no exception , some people saw more than others. But the universal testimony is a plane hit the building. seen by far more than they had time or incentive to write about. It was in the middle of the day, in front of the worlds largest office building. The place was packed with people.
You people didn't study this at all. You invented your own answer going in, and then followed conspiracy sites for things to fit into your own answer already established. And there were literally countless vids, pictures, and claims from the truthers, Some so obnoxious they were laughable, but all proven wrong. that you just sucked up without question, and carefully avoided all real events. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html
and a big thanks to you Bob ... you managed to show a video with a shitload of aircraft parts ... did you watch this Eleuthera? ...
Right and not one part was physically matched to AA77 even though the guy in the video claims they would be used to identify the aircraft. Not to mention not one part from ANY of the claimed airliners was ever physically matched to any of the claimed airliners. That was the actual point of the video in case you missed it. Furthermore that "shitload of aircraft parts" plus all the others from all 4 claimed crashes put together barely fill up the back of a pickup truck. I can show you many things that might serve to support the official fairy tale. The problem is there are thousands of pieces of evidence that contradict it or at the very least question it. And this is the problem with those who spend 24/7 groveling to the OCT, all they do is point to whatever might support the OCT and ridicule, dismiss or have every excuse under the sun to marginalize all other evidence, testimony and eyewitness claims. They also constantly ignore the fact that they were fed less than half a story since there is a ton of evidence/documents that have been withheld from the public.
They don't match that plane, they match the type of plane, and many parts are interchangeable. ie. the wheels probably fit lots of types of planes.
Looks like tons of parts to me, and they just showed part of it. It took semi trailers to move that stuff.
Thanks but your opinions have nothing to do with the facts about 9/11 not to mention you have no credibility so any discussion with you about 9/11 is a waste of time for me. But you do have the right to laugh at me all you want if you think it helps defend the OCT. Your immaturity is not my problem, it’s yours. Just be warned trolling is a violation of the rules of this forum and you will be reported each and every time you continue to exhibit your immaturity.
So anyone who proves you wrong is trolling. You are putting your claims on a public forum. The forms are open to discussion. That's the whole reason for them. You make claims, but refuse to answer honest questions about them. when you are proven wrong, you accuse a person of trolling. why can't you back up what you are saying with honest discussion. when I make a post, I expect people to question what I write, And I address all questions.
The aircraft at this point was going way to fast for it's design, and was probably ready to self destruct. They never could have recovered.
The above (and much of the rest of your post) is a perfect example of your lack of credibility. Proving me wrong has nothing to do with trolling. An example of trolling is the post you wrote that was deleted for violating the rules ... trolling. Again I am under no obligation to answer any of your questions, especially any loaded ones based on a fallacy. As this forum shows, I readily answer legitimate questions whether I agree or disagree with the poster. That’s 100% false. Good for you. That’s debatable but you also troll and ridicule when you disagree.
I'm afraid we have different points of view. I don't know where you are, but I am an American citizen, proud to be one, and I resent the fact, you are disrespecting all these people who lost their lives on 9/11. You are promoting something totally false, and using people, who for lack of a better choice of words, Lack the mental ability to differentiate between fact and fiction.
