'Secret plans to evacuate the Queen if no-deal Brexit causes riots'

What I actually described was a defensive SUPPLY ROUTE, to secure the main roads of Afghanistan not a Trump-style border wall.


Admittedly, I described the pillboxes as "One every 1000 metres on both borders", (that's a total of 2 pillboxes every 1000 metres of supply route) but by "both borders" I mean both sides of the supply route's defensive perimeter.

If Trump was wisely a fan of my supply route plan for Afghanistan's main roads but instead of implementing it in Afghanistan where it is needed, he rather foolishly adapted it to implement for the US, then maybe he would have proposed a 12 mile security perimeter around Route 66 and other interstate highways, not a border wall along the Mexican-US border! Trump isn't a fan of my Afghan supply route plan and he hasn't adapted it for his border wall plan.

In terms of numbers of troops my plan recommended 25-30 infantry per kilometre, 40-48 infantry per mile.

More details of my Afghan supply route plans in my post at this link.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-raids-afpak-strategy.256799/#post-1062525354

 

The Maginot Line was an extreme version of Trump's border wall, not an extreme version of my supply route plan.

The "enemy" in Afghanistan is Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and sometimes Iran too. If you think the enemy is just the Taliban then you've lost before you have begun.

My supply route plan is not a complete strategy. It requires taking the war to those who are sponsoring the Taliban and using such tactics as seizing Saudi oil tankers and selling their oil off to the highest bidder and using the profits to stoke an Arab people's revolution for democracy. It involves broadcasting during the intermission of Pakistan cricket matches full details of how the ISI have sponsored the Taliban and subjected the people of Pakistan - and the conventional military - much terrorist carnage, and how this is being done to serve a medieval agenda of Islamic fundamentalism that needs stamping out by closing down various Universities of Jihad and locking up the staff and taking similar measures against the ISI.

PS. My supply route defence plan was not wholly "static" but included highly mobile components that could quickly react against an attack.

 

The Queen has a large group of right-wing thugs who scare republicans like me - the UK police state!

If you are talking about right-wing terrorists then they are most interested in killing socialists, like the right-wing terrorist who killed Jo Cox MP and the right-wing terrorist who killed the Norwegian Labour youth.

Right wing terrorists are funded by those who support the monarchy. They are not going to lift a finger to establish a democratic republic. They are going to go on killing peaceful socialists because that is the kind of cowards they are.

 

Well speaking as a republican, I would have been delighted if any of the US Presidents had decided to REGIME CHANGE the UK.

 

My website forbids hotlinking of images which means that you can't just use the image url like that because it won't display. You have to link to the webpage itself, like this
http://peterdow.scienceontheweb.net/sciengforum/CATAMARANtank.htm
and readers have to visit that page before the images will appear embedded in your post.

 

Sorry, actually, the full quote from my plan is

"One every 1000 metres on both borders should be manned 24/7. Binoculars, automatic rifles such as AK47 and night vision for 3. Two or more other gun positions per 1000 m on each border are normally unmanned and don't need the expense of real guns sitting there all the time. Such extra positions confuse attackers and serve as firing positions for mobile reaction teams to occupy in emergencies and who can bring additional weapons with them."​

So actually, the number of pillboxes would be three or more every 1000 metres on each side (that's a total of 6 or more pillboxes every 1000 metres of supply route or 1 per 166 metres).

So actually, Scotsman was closer with "every 200 metres" than I remembered from my own plan of 5 years ago. So that's impressive of Scotsman to be more familiar with the details of my plan than I am!

 

And at the same time doing our bit to reduce the UK's burgeoning population? Anarchists and other useless eaters? Yep, count me in - time for a cull! lol

 

So you are a traitor wishing for the democratically elected government of the UK to be removed by a foreign power, nice.

 

Really and how has your imagined Police State affected you in the past twelve months?

 

No-one "democratically elected" Queen Elizabeth, at all.

The "regime" that needs "changing" is the United Kingdom regime, the regime of the kingdom, of the monarch and of the monarch's privy council, the ruling royalist regime of "Right Honourables" who rule the UK, regardless of all principles of democracy.

That's not a "democratic" regime because it imposes itself as a unitary kingdom in Great Britain and Northern Ireland even where there are significant minorities who want out of the UK even today.

It is not democratic to impose a unitary state and demand that it must stay as a unitary state because the existing regime demands that it must.

For example, in Scotland, in 2014, 45% of Scottish voters voted that Scotland should be a country that is independent of the UK, yet 100% of Scots remain undemocratically subjugated within the UK - no offer of a 2-state solution, nor a partition of Scotland, that would give 45% of Scots democratic self-government in a country of our own.

Any foreign power which supports a true democracy for the people would be welcome to help the people get the regime change which so many of us desire, as demonstrated in London by the plans to evacuated the Queen.

The Queen would not be preparing to be evacuated if the people were content with the existing regime so regime change is clearly on the people's agenda and that's democracy.

 

I was subject to a show trial and a miscarriage of justice in the Queen's police state courts within the last 12 months, as I documented on my blog.
TUESDAY, 20 FEBRUARY 2018 St Valentine's week miscarriage of justice at Aberdeen Sheriff Court
I was terrorised by the UK police state into attending that pantomime of costumed Queen's lackeys and I am terrorised now into paying off the £300 fine which was imposed.

Even before then I was and am being forced to pay off a £500 fine imposed in 2017 after the show Twitter trial which I posted about in post #12.

Each and every day my life is defined by a lack of career and a lack of a family of my own because my whole life has been ruined by previous actions of the UK police state to exclude me from university here in Aberdeen from 1991 and to deny me civil liberties and legal human rights to campaign against my exclusion, by university mismanagement employed lawyers who took a court action in the Supreme Court in Edinburgh which found me guilty of contempt of court and was threatening to jail me for contempt if I did not cease publication of leaflets blowing the whistle on university and court mismanagement.

I am 58 and you don't get over being arrested, tortured, locked up and excluded from society for decades because in this particular year I haven't been tortured or locked up. There is such a thing as post-traumatic stress disorder and if I don't have it I have something pretty close.

 

We live in a democracy and the fact is there is no will within the UK to get rid of the monarchy particularly the present Queen who probably has more support amongst the people than ANY politician in the UK at present. Personally I would support a republic but I am pragmatic enough to realise that the system we have will not be easily changed and in the meantime we have a better representative as our head of state than many other countries. You called for regime change from a President that did not even get a majority vote in his own country. So much for your love of democracy!

 

I took on my local council once, on an issue which adversely affected anyone who lived by a railway; the useless MP wouldn't do anything for them, even though some were contemplating suicide, so it was down to me. Long story short - first thing was that replies to my letters to the RSSB (Rail Standards and Safety Board) and the council suddenly stopped, and the next was the threat of a visit from the bailiffs. So much for 'local democracy'?

 

I have often spoken to my MP and other politicians and it never occurred to me to mention my state of dress, why on earth did you consider offering to meet a woman naked or half naked. Sorry buddy at best you were stupid and naive at worst a scary pervert. I think you were lucky to get away with a small fine and not a damn good kicking by a male friend of the lady.

 

We do not "live in a democracy", meaning government by all the people. The UK allows me no governing privileges, I am not allowed legal human rights of freedom of expression and the right not to be discriminated against. In no sense am I allowed to be part of "a government of the people, by the people and for the people".

It is not correct to claim there is "no will" to get rid of the monarchy. That will may not be a majority of the people in the UK as yet but there is definitely some will.

The BBC broadcasts pro-Queen propaganda 24/7/52, which is aped by other broadcasters in the UK and across the world.

So it is no surprise that the majority of people who watch that propaganda believe that the Queen is wanted.

I would call for support from ALL Americans and from their elected representatives to support a president who was offering to regime change the UK, to give us a proper democracy.

However, I have not specifically singled out a call to President Trump because as I have mentioned he met with the Queen last year so presumably he is a fan of hers, so what would be the point in putting our hopes in Trump?

 

Much as we disagree with each other I do not believe for one minute you would be so stupid as to offer to meet a woman in your home naked or half naked as this guy did!

 

What guy?

 

I notice that you have not responded to the second part of my post, so here it is again.

Each and every day my life is defined by a lack of career and a lack of a family of my own because my whole life has been ruined by previous actions of the UK police state to exclude me from university here in Aberdeen from 1991 and to deny me civil liberties and legal human rights to campaign against my exclusion, by university mismanagement employed lawyers who took a court action in the Supreme Court in Edinburgh which found me guilty of contempt of court and was threatening to jail me for contempt if I did not cease publication of leaflets blowing the whistle on university and court mismanagement.

I am 58 and you don't get over being arrested, tortured, locked up and excluded from society for decades because in this particular year I haven't been tortured or locked up. There is such a thing as post-traumatic stress disorder and if I don't have it I have something pretty close.

 

We do not live in a direct democracy we live in a representative democracy and you and I have the opportunity to be part of government, the caveat is that we need to get elected and that means working with the current system from within to change it. Calling on foreign governments to change the regime in this country is not only silly but traitorous. Your defence council was not wrong when he described you as a fantasist!

 

No mate, your life is ruined because of your own actions and blaming everybody else is not going to help. If you are dumb enough to go on printing leaflets when a court tells you not to, that is your problem. Stop seeing yourself as a martyr and use your intelligence to get a bit of enjoyment out of the remaining years of your life.

Now answer my question why did you even mention that you were single and prepared to meet a woman naked or semi-naked in your flat?

 

Peter Dow.

 

I'm single. I am looking for a woman. I was curious as to what my chances with this young lady politician might be. I made some flirtatious comments. No big deal.

I didn't do anything wrong. As it happens my curiosity was inappropriate because she is not the kind of woman I am interested in, and she is not interested in me, so the feeling is mutual.

No, if I had been at all lucky then either she or a male friend of hers would have told me that she wasn't interested in me, to satisfy my curiosity - or she could have just ignored my flirtatious remarks altogether.

I was unlucky in that she decided to go directly to the police to make a complaint without saying a word to me first.

However everyone in Aberdeen and in Scotland is unlucky to be condemned to false arrests, false prosecutions, miscarriage of justices and false convictions because of the police state and rotten Queen's courts which rule us.

Any competent law and order government would have asked a police officer to offer the complainant tea and sympathy and to tell her "there is nothing to worry about because Mr Dow is a gentleman and as soon as he knows that you are not interested in him he will understand and will not pop the question again".

But there is no competence whatsoever in this kingdom and that is why people want the Queen out.

 

"Now answer my question why did you even mention that you were single and prepared to meet a woman naked or semi-naked in your flat?"

Question answered.

 

No you did do something wrong, that is why you were fined, I do not believe any intelligent person is incapable of signalling romantic intentions without mentioning your state of undress!

What was inappropriate was mentioning you were prepared to meet her semi naked or naked at your flat, get that in your head.