Seismic signals and witness testimony indicate explosions via demolition on 9/11

Aren't we all a little dishonest, Patriot? I mean, you claim you're not here to defend the US government. But look at your track record. Just saying...

By the way, how's the weather in Denver this time of year?

 

I defend the truth. If the truth is the government didn't do it, that is what I am defending. If it comes out that the government is guilty, great! That is the truth and I will be against the government. You trying to pretend my track record on the truth means I'm REALLY just here to defend the government only shows you've completely missed the point. You want me to be against the government? All you have to do is show me hard evidence that proves the government was behind 9/11 and I'm all there.

Absolutely gorgeous. Mid 60s, blue skies and everything is green.

 

Nope. When one site prints the entire quotes its considered credible. When site takes out bits and pieces of quotes in order to mislead the reader, they are not credible. Doesn't matter which view the site aligns with. It's how truthful they are in their presentation.

Could be. But my mind is not made up, so, no, anything contrary is not automatically dismissed. Depends on the merit of the argument.

For instance, in another thread another poster (SkyStryker I think his name was) pointed out that if one were to accept the progressive collapse theory and only floors in the impact zone had to give way for the entire building to collapse then it could be reasonable to argue that to bring the entire building down with explosives would only require explosives to be planted on those few floors.

I did not dismiss it. It made me think. But as yet, I'm unaware of any evidence that supports that theory. In fact I'm unaware of anyone else that has even claimed that. But it is certainly more believable than the nanothermite paint or directed energy weapons except for the fact that the planes would still not be necessary.

Are you here to defend the terrorists, Jango? Look at your track record. Just saying.

I don't think you are. Just making an example.

 

You do realize you kill your own credibility by being to arrogant and condescending towards those who disagree with you? No...I think the truth should be the truth, and all sides of it should be presented, and none of it should be "classified". People that push a false story should lose their first amendment rights. People who call themselves Patriots while lying through their filthy teeth should be in jail.

 

I don't think David Ray Grifter and Richard Gage should lose their first amendment rights, nor should they be thrown in jail until they've had their day in court.

Your position regarding 'truthers' seems a bit fascist.

 

I am only this way with truthers, and it doesn't hurt my credibility because unlike you, I can back up my claims with facts a

There aren't multiple sides to the truth. There are multiple sides of a story, one of which is the truth.

So you're saying all truther should lose their first amendment rights and be sent to jail? Wow.

 

Jim Fetzer is pushing the "no planes/video fakery" story. You even agree that this is false story.

Should Jim Fetzer lose his first amendment rights?

 

Since thermite does not "explode" as demolition explosives do, Fraud, this thread would seem to prove that your "thermite paint" theory is incorrect.

 

LOLOL

That's right. Thermite doesn't explode.

 

Chucklenuts Jones and his idiot buddy Harrit have not proven that their substance contains anything that is not a component of regular every-day PAINT. They have not explained why anybody would add KAOLIN to any kind of thermite. They have not shown that the exact kind of paint that they tested was not used on the trusses.

The columns and trusses were painted with different paints, and those two idiots didn't even bother to find out what the difference was.

We did exactly that over at JREF, then hired a forensic chemist to check our work.

Whadda ya know! It is paint.

 

that's right,it doesn't....

 

You mean "ordinary" people can actually do RESEARCH to confirm or deny their hypothesis?????? Wow, why don't 9/11 Deniers know this?

(obvious answer is obvious)