Sheriff called parking spot shooting legal under ‘stand your ground’ laws. Prosecutors disagreed.

When this guy comes out of the store, most rational people would yell or get the guys attention.

This guy doesn't do that.

He puts his hands in his pockets and walks up as non-threateningly as possible. At the last second, he shoves him from the side to catch him by surprise and put him in the prone position.

Then he advances on him while pulling up his pants.

He ambushed this guy to get him on the ground. Anyone who's ever fought knows that 99% of your opponents that you put on the ground are in the worst possible position to defend themselves, which is why he did it.

His acts were intentional, and they were intended to allow him to beat this guy as long as he wanted.

 

Thug cops are enforcing their own version of the law, which is to oppress people and get inventory for the profit prison system.

 

So how many cops are thug cops and how many cops are good cops?

 

Sorry but there is zero indication he intended to beat the guy after the initial assault (shove). Think you're reading into this something you want to see that just isn't there. The shove should not have happened but did not warrant death by this trigger-happy *******.

 

On the contrary. I know exactly what I'm talking about.

You don't walk up with your hands in your pockets and attack at the last second, then walk towards the guy on the ground unless your intent is to beat them.

His mistake was not waiting until the last second so that the "he took a step back" crowd would have to acknowledge what was actually happening.

 

Still did not warrant the physical assault which would have landed McGlockton in jail.

 

On the entire planet, there might be ten good cops. All the rest are thugs.

 

No, they were required to move by law.

 

I'm not going to explain bullet ballistics. Not to mention, where it came out is irrelevant.

 

That's a public business that has to comply with state laws requiring maintaining handicap accessibility in order to remain in business, which is enforced by the state by issuing placards to eligible individuals.

 

What you asked doesn't matter, which is the answer to your question.

The bullet entered under his left nipple. If it came out in his toe or out the top of his head doesn't matter.

As I said, bullets don't always go in straight lines. If you don't believe me, you're welcome to research that on your own time.

 

Lol. Okay.

 

You don't have to cause serious injury. You just have to be at risk of serious injury.

If someone comes at you with a knife, do you have to let them stab you before you can defend yourself? That's a ridiculous premise.

You might say I have some knowledge on the topic. I'm not making assumptions.

I'm also not going to attack armed cops or commit felony domestic battery, but this guy did both.

 

Here's but one example:

This guy was not protecting his family. Period. Concern for the safety of his family would be more along the lines of: See crazy dude acting crazy=Need to remove my family from the situation as quickly as possible so my kids don't see any more of this guys meltdown.
Proceed to get in the car and drive his family away with as little trauma to them as possible.

Instead he appears to feel the best way to "protect" his family= I will beat the chit out of dude and show my kids how we deal with someone who "disrespects" us. (Even though he clearly "disrespects others" on the regular.)

One has to wonder how he treats (errmmm... treated...) his kids when they act "disrespectfully". We know how he treated women.

Truthfully, though, I doubt he even gave his kids a second thought, he was just reacting to violently to an ego hit. He left his five year old child in the store and was willing endanger them all by escalating the situation from verbal to violent when he should have been concerned with getting them safely away from a lunatic as quickly and calmly as he could.

Shooter started the whole thing. Dead guy made the worst possible choices in response to the incident. He likely thought he was going to beat up a mentally disturbed guy, feel like a man and be done with it. He didn't seem to have the capacity to learn from his mistakes. ( prior assault charges).

 

That's not true. Dead guy was waiting for shooter to get back up. Why was he waiting? Do you think he was going to give him a hand? See if he was ok maybe? Please...

 

That is exactly what I saw too. And I've seen it a few times in real life, (minus the gun.). He didn't shove the guy and walk to his car. He was waiting for the guy to get back up. Maybe I'm just "assuming". I could be wrong about why he was waiting there, as if ready to kick the guys @ss... Perhaps he was going to offer the dude a mint or something. /s