Shills??? MOD ALERT

I think lonestar should answer the question he ducked. What do you two think?

 

I never 'ducked' any question scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c......If I didn't give you the answer YOU wanted,I can't be blamed for that.

And stop whining.

 

Wartime tax rates on the wealthiest during real times of war is simpler as a metric, for the electorate of the United States.

 

What??? I fail to see how your post relates at all to what you were responding to.

 

http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/i_was_a_political_astroturfer/

 

Jango? You still playing the role of the curious passer byer?

You're the most talented shill here and should be in charge of the other shills. You do a much more clever job of not being the obvious.

 

I wonder what sort of ego one needs to have in order to come to the conclusion that the government pays a team of people to prevent you from communicating on a forum that you're free to communicate on.

 

It appears more insecurity than actual ego. Someone's mom didn't hug them enough, so they're projecting their own low self-esteem on the net.

 

It's not like we have some kind of internet death-ray...

 

There's an air of elevated importance that permeates the thought that your speech is so meaningful and or dangerous that people must be paid or coerced to prevent others from being exposed to it.

The moderators of sites like this one are often accused of being shills. You don't need a death ray. You need a delete key. Apparently it doesn't occur to some that their keyboards are equipped with them.

 

Oh, and haven't you heard? There exists such a device that can harness and direct a beam of energy collected from a nearby hurricane.

One would think that August - October would be a dangerous time to be a truther.

 

Low Season for Caribbean vacations

High Season for Truthers

 

I agree Fang, they do have a feeling of high self importance to think that the government pays people to come here and argue with them. The TM is dead, as stated in the other thread going on. There's nothing left, I mean, even the fringe group that come here are getting smaller. Either they give up or realize that their cause is a bunch of bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

 

Realizations among truthers are rarely constrained by limitations like reality or logic. Hence, they are prone to concluding you are a Jewish lizard person, and every truther knows that Jewish lizard persons simply cannot be reasoned with.

 

This is about people in denial but a lot of shills behave this way too.
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/714-shining-a-light-on-911-denial.html

 

Being unable to swallow your truther pabulum isn't 'denial' scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c

It's just good sense.

 

The shrink does not have any evidence for her crap. She bangs on a bit about "nationalistic faith" and overlooks the fact that part of that "faith" is a mistaken belief that trained terrorists cannot do something like this to US. Thus it has to be our own government gone rogue because nobody else could do it.

 

Are you kidding? There's a mountain of evidence.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746

The evidence shows that the government did it (see above ink).

It would be kind of hard for an outside group to wire the twin towers for controlled demolition. It would also be kind of hard for an outside group to arrange for a smaller-than-a-757 plane crash into the Pentagon and get the goverment to say it was a 757 (see above link).

 

Yes, that would be difficult. Irrelevant, of course, since none of that crap happened.

 

This is Petraeus' testimony before the Senate Armed Service Committee: http://www.armed-services.senate.gov/statemnt/2010/03 March/Petraeus 03-16-10.pdf
The program he talks about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Earnest_Voice

And, of course, there is always this: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/387.pdf

 

I understand the 'bots are easy to spot, though. In general they will post large, un-sourced, cut-and-paste quotes coupled with random links without offering any opinion of their own.

 

I wanted to ask, Is there any doubt still?

But then I realized who would be responding.

The article I forget to link is from the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks

 

Any doubt about what?

 

Shills.

 

As one of the accused, what do you think?