All Truthers are clearly agents of some foreign government bent on sowing revolution from within the very United States itself. I used to assume it was Russia (old habits die hard), but, based on extensive experience, I've come to the conclusion that 9/11 Inside Job theories are a complete fabrication of the Chinese government and it's intelligence agency. The biggest tip-off for me was their poor grammar and syntax, which definitively shows that we are dealing with agents of a foreign land who didn't learn English as their first language. Your frayed threads are showing comrades. Since it's been established that we have agents amongst us, I have a few questions for our resident Chinese intelligence agents (sort of a from one agent to another). -When you post your disinfo Youtube vids, do you have a special password to get around the Chinese firewall, or do you merely subscribe to a VPN service like other Chinese people do? If so, do you expense it? -Do you work out of a sweatshop in Shenzhen or have the Party higher-ups given you posh accommodations in Beijing? -Do you only post on Lenovo computers? -Do you get all the same National holidays off like they rest of your citizens? I ask because I noticed this forum was suspiciously quiet during the Chinese New Year Holiday. Again, frayed threads comrades. -Do you have a health care plan? I ask this because we might be able to "turn" you because the USG offers an excellent plan. Happy Year of the Dragon Truthers! -
You guys are a joke. Really. This is how you respond. When people pose serious questions and only want a serious debate. I have come to realize that is impossible on this thread. You only can respond with satire, character assassination, refuse to answers certain questions. However your consistency is impressive. Is it true that the debunkers are the ones hiding behind the anonymous proxies?
Naw. We just have your number. No, what you've written is the typical truther whining of a truther caught in yet another sock puppet. Whining about being here for serious debate while opening up with insults and using chemtrails as "proof". Yeah, that's REAL believable. Another truther falacy they like to hide behind. They're the good guys and everyone else is evil. I don't hide behind proxies. I don't use multiple names. I don't have to because I deal in the truth, not bull(*)(*)(*)(*) like chemtrails. OMG! I see streaks in the sky! The sky is falling! Wait! No, they're chemicals! AAAAH! Never mind contrails have been well documented for decades. Never mind it is easy to find out the chemical composition of a cloud through spectral analysis. It is so much easier to buy into the chicken little mentality of the sky is falling or full of chemicals or the big bad gubment is responsible for 9/11 than grow up and understand the truth.
I have been having fun with this I must admit. I soon realized it wasn't possible to communicate with the debunkers. So my friends and I have been enjoying a game of "Predict the Response". This is comical.
This is so true. When a true believer like you is confronted with common sense or facts, communication soon stops.
I just lost $5. I thought the next response was an image of chemtrails. My neighbor knew it was a shot at my character.
You're admitting to trolling and game playing, and you are whining about someone 'assaulting your character'? Why can't 'truthers' just tell the truth?
Common sense is not "owned" by anyone. Hence the word common. Then again, you won't accept the facts either, so your whining is rather moot, wouldn't you say?
This thread started to spin into a chemtrail thread for a while courtesy of me and I apologized for that. Now it's just trivial BS. As far as chemtrail evidence or at the very least spraying in the sky. I can't possibly fathom another outcome than what I believe. But guys I don't think its nefarious in concept. I truly don't.
Serious questions like this one?: Or would that be an example of serious debate? I'm confused. Because that's what NAB was responding to. He quoted it right in his post. In fact, can you point to the exact part of the post NAB was responding to that contained a serious question, or a serious point of debate? All I saw was name calling, and a weak off topic argument from incredulity. I have answered every one of your questions. When do you plan on answering all of mine? You can start with the one I asked here: http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...iracy-theories-debunked-8.html#post1060847435 In more then 10 years of posting on the internet I have only ever used 1 screen name. Can you say the same?
Shocking new discovery. Planes hit the towers, they caught fire and came down. Plane hits the Pentagon. Big fire. Plane hits the ground. Kills everyone on board. Happened about 11 years ago.
This is going nowhere. One more time my question was about the technical capabilities of the Pentagon cameras. You say you know and answer. You don't back up your knowledge with any documentation. I am not a big time blogger. If you could prove to me with manufacturer documentation or at least something credible regarding the cameras. I would step away. You have so many people that pile on me with crap. You are the one who seems to have the knowledge but man I can't take your word for it. When people tell me to do the research, they lose all validity to me. They haven't taken the time to research. I am trying. I will be going to the Library and go old school to see what I can come up with. I am asking questions and you have the answers so I just hoped you wanted to prove me wrong would be to drop a link in your post and shut me up.
Your story is not very consistent. First you say this . . . then you say this . . And you say this . . . But Followed by this But again If you can't take anyone's word for it, why is it bad that someone encourages you to do the research yourself. What do you hope to find at the library concerning the Pentagon security camera system that you can't find on the Internet? You came here wanting to be proved wrong??
Hello? You think I like wondering what happened on 911. I can accept proof. You guys don't produce any.
And if you are given proof that you will accept of the capabilities of the Pentagon security camera your mind will be at ease? Why this intense interest in the frame rate of a camera in light of all of the other evidence?
I cannot accept without evidence that the Pentagon could not get a picture of a plane entering the building. All I hear are the cameras weren't capable. I don't buy that. Its just me. But I do accept evidence.
Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). You're building your entire case on your disbelief that the Pentagon cameras weren't capable of taking a clear picture of the plane. In the mean time you throw away the following evidence: Flight 77 is missing. A plane hit the Pentagon based on over a hundred eyewitnesses. Several of these witnesses are pilots and identify the plane as a 757. A plane hit the Pentagon based on radar records that ultimately lead all the way back to where ATC lost Flight 77. The flight data recorder for Flight 77 was found in the Pentagon. The remains of the people on board Flight 77 were found and identified through dental records and DNA analysis. In the mean time we have jokers like you pretending the fact the model number and schematics of the camera used by the Pentagon to monitor traffic into and out of the parking lot holds the key as to whether or not said joker can believe the official story. WTF?!? Seriously?
What does a picture of an aircraft entering a building prove in your mind? There's truthers here that refuse to believe that an aircraft entered the WTC and it was filmed with millions watching. Does the case for you hinge on whether the Pentagon has a photograph of a 757, or is this a talking point for you to hammer on?
Yeah seriously because I've heard all the other spins regarding the pentagon and I just don't know what to believe. It would be nice to have a photo of the plane entering the pentagon. I also suggested earlier that I believe the Pentagon would have full spectrum of cameras. Facial recognition, high speed cameras for that psycho arab in the Lamborghini who just planted a bomb in the parking lot. Hell I don't know but the Pentagon has one hell of a budget and didn't they misplace 2 trillion dollars before 911. Maybe they bought some dam nice cameras with that money.
