Shortage of eligible men as women struggle in dating game

No one said " pretending " can be a " judicial system "

As always you avoid fact and avout truth by making false statements about what others said.

It is a factual sentence structure that feminists to support equal rights but their influence on the judicial system proves they are liars and frauds who support no such thing.

That is absolute fact and you have nothing but spin to try and pretend I said something else.

- - - Updated - - -

His comment was factual and made perfect sense.

Your denial is in fact just spin and denial.

 

Have you failed to remember I conceded the issue? No reason to pathetically obsess over a non-issue some months ago.

I note your continued avoidance of a simple question.

 

Oh I remember, it only took you like three weeks. "Obsess' is one of those oh so cheap internet quips, surely beneath you? I thinks its entirely germaine (not greer ) to bring it up as an actual example of something. Since you like examples and all, its an example of obsessive intransigence
it the face of the simplest and most obvious fact that you were wrong then and are again now.

You asked a rhetorical question unrelated to your nonsensical assertion, which you still are avoiding. Why do you change the subject?

But being a step above and beyond you, honesty and forthrightness wise...

Both, usually, or its not a fight What a confused question.

Their possessing? I should twit you about your command of Engrish, I know they dont teach it here.

It depends, Where I got divorced, its joint property, and I have a lot more than he; mine
is protected overseas, and I wanted nothing of his. Keep the damn house.

The kid is also overseas. And Mr. Ex doesnt pay a dime.

It always depends. You, like a fundy it seems, see everything to be yes / no

black / white, either / or. Life, Bud, aint like that.



Who can hit the other partner and get away with it, the man or the woman?

Either, both, neither, it depends. Its not yes / no, black / white, either / on. Didnt you know?

Notice now, that while i did address things unrelated to my comment on your nonsensical statement, you still cant admit you made no sense with what you said. Will it take three weeks?
I know its hard for you, and its not worth it to me. I got your measure already.

Tell your sycophant to bug out, he is even more confused than you are.

 

Both usually? No.

By default, who has custody of the child, and who applies for custody of the child? Does the state take the child away from the mother from birth and give it to the father, and require the mother to file custody papers? Or is it the other way around?

And in a typical divorce case, where the assets are not granted special protections, who gets the house?

And in a typical situations that does not offer special protections?

Neither or both? lol Who is more likely to be hauled off in handcuffs? The male or the female?

Why are media depictions of women on men violence typically portrayed in a comical fashion and the opposite portrayed in a negative fashion?

 

All wrong again as always but at least you began to address the facts even if you try to spin them.

men fight for custody women do not yes it is still a fight but one which the state supports the women on.
This is because in EVERY state default custody is automatically given to the woman. The burden of proof is on the man to try and get costudy and it is almost never granted.

Property once again almost always favors the woman and that is that the judicial ystem is hostile to men due to the influence of women.

Assault is not an each case is different matter althought you try to spin the facts that way .

The facts are a woman can routinely beat a man and walk away with no charges except in the most extreme of exceptions.

Men cannot.

You obviously know nothing about the law although you claim to do so.

Your deliberate ignorance of those facts proves equal rights for men and women mean nothing to you just like all other feminists you are pretending.

 

I am available

 

If this is true, then why is there a, 'violence against women act, but there is no such thing as a, 'Violence Against Men Act'???

Some activists oppose the bill. Janice Shaw Course, a senior fellow at Concerned Women for America's Beverly LaHaye Institute called the Act a "boondoggle" which "ends up creating a climate of suspicion where all men are feared or viewed as violent and all women are viewed as victims." She described the Act as creating a "climate of false accusations, rush to judgment and hidden agendas" and criticized it for failing to address the factors identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as leading to violent, abusive behavior.[8] Conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly denounced VAWA as a tool to "fill feminist coffers" and argued that the Act promoted "divorce, breakup of marriage and hatred of men."[9]

Don't worry Taikoo I don't expect a response from you. Your silence speaks for itself.

 

I am not but I am single

 

Those are all violent arguments against the VAWA but there are others.

The VAWA was actually not passed recently is was renewed. It was passed under Clinton. Since it was passed Domestic Violence rates and stats have not been touched by it a few spikes and then some drops but the act has had no effect what so ever in reducing violence. Not a single life can be shown to have been saved by it nor a single woman saved from abuse ( much like the Brady bill which thankfully was allowed to expire ). The VAWA does as pointed out grant money to many organizations such as NOW which in turn funnel money to democrat politicians and candidates.

The VAWA was also redundant and unecessary. Every state had strict laws against domestic violence before the VAWA was passed. Many of these states had laws which made much more sense than the VAWA ( some did not ). They strictly defined domestic violence and created sensible standards for investigating and prosecuting violators. The VAWA however defines domestic violence in an extremely broad and ambiguous manner. Under the VAWA if you raise your voice in an argument it is domestic violence. If you leave during an argument and slam the door behind you it is domestic violence. Yet somehow under the act women are seldom prosecuted for domestic violence. In fact in the few instances when men call the police for help with their abusive wives no arrest is made. If a wife calls the police the man is always arrested.

The VAWA is a worthless idiotic law which never should have been passed. The only reason to support it is because one is hostile to men and views the above facts as being beneficial to women

 

Coming from a feminist who openly admits, "I don't like men"

 

Taikoo admits she is a lier. Taikoo admits she doesn't like men. Taikoo admits she has a trustfund and brags about it as if she earned the money herself (entitlement), three traits, lying, hating men, and entitlement, all traits that make taikoo a model feminist, an absolutely model feminist

 

Available for what or whom?

These "guys", so presented, could hardly say in clearer terms that they are either celibate or gay.

 

depends on the what or whom

 

lol wrong.

Sex and relationships are two different things.

 

As worded, it said men dont need women.

I didnt know it was to be read as "only need women as something to use".

That is kind of sad, that you see sex and relationship as totally different things, but that is just how I see it, for you it may be for the best. For me, the two are absolutely inseparable.

 

Is it true under the violence against women act that a man will always go to prison if a women calls the police???

 

I don't know if the VAWA requires this but has been general policy for most police departments for decades now. From what I understand it is the result of litigation.

 

It's not that simple - that's the the response that "nice guys" who aren't having luck with women want to hear (and is repeated ad infinitum in "chick flicks") because it makes them feel okay with not self-improving - but it's the single worst piece of advice you could give a guy who's really looking to improve his dating scene

 

This kind of thing happens in a lot of areas. One place or another gets overloaded with men or women. It's an interesting thing, but it isn't the case in all areas. It goes both ways, of course. Places like San Diego actually made a list of 5 worst places to meet women, based on ratios. I, of course, had the wonderful luck to be stationed there for a few years.

 

The truth is, men in Australia prefer non-Australian women, particularly from Asia, Europe and Africa. There's defintely something wrong with Australian women, not being able to attract and keep Australian men. Many men are leaving the country for good, supposedly for work opportunities, but I suspect it is also because they can meet more non-Australian women, as they often marry women from overseas.

 

Why do you automatically assume that there's something wrong with the women? A whole continent of women who have something "wrong" with them?
And a whole continent of men leaving becasue there's something wrong with the women???
C'mon, really?



I doubt it. There's lots and lots of little baby Australians covering the country so I hardly think all Australian men have a
problem with the women there..

Lots of men do have a tendency to find that "something different" is more attractive BECAUSE it's different which is why more men cheat on their spouses than women do. Men operate on the shallow visual level..
I doubt Australian men are any more like that than any other men..

 

First of all the information that men cheat on their souses more than women do is not based on strong data in all likely hood the precentages are close to the same.

However we also know that get rid of men once they recieve what they wish to take and then kick those men aside for a better looking and more satisfactory model.

This is why 70% of all no fault divorces ( and most divorces in states without no fault laws ) are initiated by women. They settle for the beta male who gives them a house kids and money then destroy him in divorce while moving a more atrractive man into their bed.

IF men cheat more it is simply because they know it is more expensive to get divorced first.Women simply go the opposite way.

The point is women are equally as shallow

 

Sources Please that men cheat on their spouses more than women do

Source please that men operate on the shallow visual level

No sources and we all can just assume these are just more asinine opinions of yours, not facts.

 

Who exactly is "we all".......why would you include others ? Can't you just speak for yourself? Why are you trying to speak for others?

 

It could be that Oz women are a lot like many American women, who tend to be very self absorbed and phony.

I think its generally less likely that Asian women will be putting on an act
trying to be some life-style they picked up from media.

Work ethic and family values really mean something in Asian countries.