Should trans individuals be banned from teaching grade-high school?

I know that's what conservatives are afraid of. Is that because that's how they think?

Liberal don't see talking about trans people and think that means 5 yr olds will learn about oral sex. Just conservatives, I guess.

 

It appears as you're the one making intentional untruths.

 

No more or less than you if you get to assign positions to me I get to assign them to you. You want to keep it up or you can address what I actually say and I will do the say with you.

Agreed?

 

Yep of our genus and species, the most evolved on the planet. Learn the difference between genus and family amongst all the animal kingdom.

How does our species propagate heterosexually or homosexually?

 

Why should I have to be denying things I don't say in the first place?

The current accepted number is 2% HOMOSEXUAL.

Why is it better for our species and society to encourage and promote more homosexuality and especially through our laws and government?

Like I said I can hand in right back at ya.

Yes you want other people to pay for all that, how charitable of you. I want everyone to be able to provide for themselves and be in charge of their own lives and freedom and liberty to have their freedom of choice as long as it doesn't interfere with someone else's. You keep using the words "free" and "no cost". NOTHING is free and NOTHING has no cost.

How much are you willing to tax everyone to give that to all children including the home you previously said. Why aren't the parent responsible for all that. I certainly raised all mine with the government providing for their wellbeing and paid a heck of a lot in property and sales taxes for their education.

You said when I stated that heterosexuality was vital and necessary to our species and society

To which I replied
We are about to hit the tipping point for lack or reproduction in this country and I have no doubt that future studies will lay some of that blame on the new sexual morals and destructive societal changes the left wants to impose on us.

Which you tried to then blame on other things. So is it good that people engage in homosexuality which lowers birthrates which you support or it has nothing at all to do with birthrates other things are causing it all.

You don't care if a child has a mother and a father in their life? Which one isn't important? You are unaware of studies which show little boys without fathers are very prone to all sorts of problems throughout their lives? You don't think mothers are important for little girls? Little boys? We should really encourage and promote adults to purposely denying little children either just so they can satisfy their own feelings and desires the child's come secondary? Why not do more to insure all children have the best chance at both a mother AND a father in their life?

Who is doing that? And what is wrong with orphanages. I knew lots of kids who were growing up in a local orphanage when I grew up. It's still around, they do a lobster thing every year to raise money, and does a wonderful job with kids in need. For the vast majority as with most fostering it is transitory and most go back to their home or other family member. Let's support that more rather than denying them their best chance at a mother and a father. The older rarer exception better able to handle single and homosexual maybe.

 

Because it is what the premise of what you are saying indicates. I know you cannot deny it.

Source?

Equal rights doesn’t encourage or promote anything

You want children to be able to provide for themselves? Jesus ****ing christ man

So you want people to have more children, are upset that they are not doing so because of finances, think we should promote the welfare of children but then want to throw all the weight of doing so back on the parents that ARE NOT HAVING CHILDREN BECAUSE THEY CANNOT AFFORD IT.

But it’s the gays fault. I would ask if you are hearing yourself but I know you do.

I have never said it is “good” that people engage in homosexuality. Just that they should have the right to do so and be afforded equal protections and rights as everyone else.

You attacking gay people isn’t going to cause less single family homes. I think a loving and stable home is better than not having one. I think all families should be supported.

You should look up some of the data on the outcome of children that are in orphanages for a significant period of time, especially the ones that age out.

 

I often wonder if folks so preoccupied with homosexuality and its millions of new variants were focused on folks that picked their nose or urinated in the street before these new sex trends came about.

 

What is this obsession and attempts to mzke it seem like half the country is homosexual and to force this LGBTUYW narcissim on all of us?

 

Just as yours indicated what I aid.

Washington Post

More specifically, 1.8 percent of men self-identify as gay and 0.4 percent as bisexual, and 1.5 percent of women self-identify as lesbian and 0.9 percent as bisexual.

The results are generally in the same ballpark as past estimates — and far below the long-debunked 10 percent estimate. But past data that I’ve seen had suggested that there were about twice as many gay or bisexual men as lesbian or bisexual women; this data suggests that there is no such gender gap..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...he-u-s-population-is-gay-lesbian-or-bisexual/

Gay Pride MONTH does. Rainbow flags does. Sanctioning homosexual marriage does.

As opposed to you just wanting to kill them all before they are born. Touche' as I said if you get to create my lositions I get to create yours.

You don't have to he rich. My parents were responsible for me and my two brothers. Their parents for them. I was responsilbe for my three, two adopted. Mine are now responsible for my 5 grandkids. Why do you assert that children can only be raised byngvernment funding?

Are you asserting homosexuals not propaging does not lower the birth rate. On the one hnd you try to claim that homsexuals are significant portion of the population but then insignificant when it comes to birthrates. Care to reconcile that?

If it isn't a good thing then we should not be encouraging or supporting or sanctioning it.

I could care less if they want to engage in their homosexulty. We as a species and a society have no obligation to encourage or support it or CELEBRATE it.

And rhat is the raee choice and we shouldn't encourage people purposely creating that choice for their own well being and not the childs.

You should look up the stories of children who did remarkably well. You should look up the stories of kids raised without fathers in the home by single mothers.

 

Except I can deny that is my position while you seem unable to do so. But whatever

Ah yes, a self-assessment study from almost a decade ago when same sex marriage was still illegal in most of the US. Excellent source bro. Desperate

Why don’t you go back to when being gay was a crime and just use those numbers since agenda and not fact is what you are looking to prove.

That’s your opinion

Outright lie. I asked you about children and you replied they should be responsible for themselves through their parents.

I was not asking about their parents. I was asking about children. If you don’t like what you are saying them maybe you need to find a new position.

That isn’t what I said. I said I support programs when parents are unable.

That isn’t what I said, you are implying that gay people are being created. I am showing they simply exist and making life more difficult for them doesn’t make more people straight.

Same sex marriage is a matter of equal rights. And families are what we should be encouraging. Gay people can and do have families.

No one cares if you celebrate anything
Equal rights however demand that gay people be given equal rights and one of those rights is the ability to sign a civil marriage contact.

There are not enough heterosexual homes to take all of the abandoned children. A stable loving family is better for the well-being of a child than the orphanage system or poverty.

Would you like to compare the numbers.
20% of the children who were in foster care will become instantly homeless. Only 1 out of every 2 foster kids who age out of the system will have some form of gainful employment by the age of 24.
https://www.aecf.org/blog/child-welfare-and-foster-care-statistics



Show me worse statistics on children raised by a same sex couple.

 

2022 — The percent of U.S. adults who identify as something other than heterosexual has doubled over the last 10 years, from 3.5 percent in 2012 to 7.1 percent, according to a Gallup poll released Thursday

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out...ults-us-doubled-decade-gallup-finds-rcna16556

 

And who gets to decide what they are?

You? Or them?


Im thinking you want it to be you.

 

And I would argue that anyone who thinks this way is just a horrible bigot.

 

Biology.

Do you think the Women's US Olympic Track Team should just go out and recruit a bunch of pretty good male track athletes and have them "decide" to be women and go sweep all the gold medals with everyone declaring them to be the best women's track team the world has ever seen? Is that your realty now? It's not a matter of science anymore everyone just gets to "decide"?

 

What part of the biology? Chromosomes? External genitalia? Internal genitalia? There's a reason why scientists roll their eyes when you spout this.

 

There is a reason they shake their heads in agreement.

Do you think the Women's US Olympic Track Team should just go out and recruit a bunch of pretty good male track athletes and have them "decide" to be women and go sweep all the gold medals with everyone declaring them to be the best women's track team the world has ever seen? Is that your realty now? It's not a matter of science anymore everyone just gets to "decide"?

 

Why would anyone need to make up ludicrous things you've posted?

 

Your comment is a great example of not knowing what you are talking about.

First of all, the International Olympic Committee has allowed transgender athletes to compete since 2004 and how many trans gender athletes have competed in the Olympics since then? I think the answer so far is a handful and that’s out of over 50,000 athletes that have competed in the summer and Winter Olympics since 2004.

How do you think athletes actually make the Olympic track team? Athletes don’t get recruited by the Women’s Olympic Track Team. The Olympic track team is made up of elite athletes who have to compete against each other in many races and only the top contenders get to the Olympics. Your comment is ridiculous.

Do you honestly believe if some kind of race fixing was going on and all of a sudden the American women’s track team was made up of recently transitioned men, that the IOC wouldn’t do anything? Do you really believe that male athletes would simply ‘pretend’ to be a woman in order to win a medal?

How many women compete in running events in the USA in a year? Over 9 million. How many running events are there per year? Over 30,000. How many times has a trans female won any of these events. Where are the headlines? There aren’t any really. Your unfounded fears are unfounded.

Being a trans female does not automatically guarantee a win against a cis female. There are many factors that make an elite athlete ‘elite’. A person’s genetic make-up and internal and external reproductive anatomy are not useful indicators of athletic performance.

 

Because they have nothing of merit with which to refute my incredibly credible and intelligent post.

 

A simple question

Do you think the Women's US Olympic Track Team should just go out and recruit a bunch of pretty good male track athletes and have them "decide" to be women and go sweep all, OR WIND MOST, the gold medals with everyone declaring them to be the best women's track team the world has ever seen? Is that your realty now? It's not a matter of science anymore everyone just gets to "decide"?

How about a pro women's basketball team made up of men pretending to be women.
I just posted the soccer match, let's send a men pretending to be women to the women's World Cup next time.

I think it is YOU who doesn't know of what they speak.

 

Still no... in fact no mentally unstable people should be anywhere near our children and especially ones with sexual fetishes... predators go to were there is ample prey,