Six more towns evacuated in Iran with more floods expected

Oh yeah... just attack Iran for no good reason at all, so they can and have the right to just blow up all of Israel. And that aint hard. It only takes blowing up 3 cities to make Israel be with just some towns who are 250K peeps and smaller. And Iran is simply WAY to big for the US to control. They couldn't control Iraq nor Afghanistan.

 

They be laughing in your face, and have all the reasons to start to actually make a nuclear bomb.

Your idea is totally juvenile. You never seem to have wondered why on earth the US hasn't attacked Iran, while they did attack Afghanistan (for +10 years) and Iraq.

 

nothing we can do until 2020, elections have consequences, we elected Trump, now have to live with that decision

 

then we would of had no deal... where is trump's bigger better deal?

oh, you wanted Trump to pull a bush and start a war with Iran

let me get this right, we stopped iran and iraq from their war, then we go to war with iraq and iran?

 

No deal is the better deal. FTR: I despise Trump, but love watching him fk with the world. It’s incredibly amusing; and the collectivist nation’s deserve what they have wrought.

 

Go for it... but let me catch my breath.

 

Iran is evil; that’s good enough for me. And please, please do attack Israel—time to end this evil Islam insanity. once-and-for-all.

 

Because of what?
It was the US who bribed the Iranian military to make a coup against an elected government. They replaced it with a fascist dictator, torturing it's people into submission. When Iran got rid of that after decades, the US than supported Saddam Hussein with it's WMD war against Iran. Seems obvious it's the US who is evil. And a country got every right to defend itself against such actions.

 

You're kidding yourself.

 

not hardly, thankfully Iran is still following the deal without the USA buy in, Trump broke the word of America... SAD!

 

America is as good as it's word... Trump broke America's word... stupid man... sad!

 

You'd take the world with you if you tried what you have in mind there - or certainly Israel. There again Israel's survival may not be important to you.

By the way in case people do not know Netanyahu has said he is going to annex the settlements in the West Bank if he gets voted back in - possibly all area C -that is 62% of the West Bank but given that Trump is beholding to Christian Zionists and Adelson, the US will forget law, forget what the US has always stood by and give them a big thumbs up. Apparently the Saudi's were less than pleased about the US claiming against International law that the Golan's were now Israeli. Possibly another reason they are thinking of giving up the dollar. Israel and the US are very proud over how they are acting with land that does not belong to Israel at the moment and we all know what pride comes before.

 

The foretelling of the black prophecies

 

Lol, Israel has nukes, and plenty of them. Iran doesn't, not even one.

"It only takes blowing up 3 cities to make Israel be with just some towns who are 250K peeps and smaller.".....8 cities in Iran are greater than 1 million in population, "and that ain't hard" to level all of them with nukes.

 

Reality is reality. Iran is evil.

 

Hmmm. Perhaps. But Iran is still evil, no matter what I think.

 

Yeah. Shame on Trump. But Iran is still evil, even if Trump is a jerk.

 

Whatever Trump is, Iran is still evil.

 

Yeah. Yeah. yeah. What comes with pride is..,Iran is evil, pure and simple. No deals with monsters. Destroy every Islamic theocracy in existence.

 

This is not the first time an accusing unscientific finger was pointed by the Iranian regime at Western countries following natural disasters.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...adinejad-says-Europe-stealing-Irans-rain.html

https://www.newsweek.com/iran-general-says-israel-behind-climate-change-stealing-clouds-1005190

I'm still waiting for the "oh my god the West and Israel put all the water they stole back in the clouds to cause floods in Iran" logical (from a strictly unscientific perspective, of course) conclusion.

 

The JCPOA was never legally binding.
https://www.truthorfiction.com/iran-nuclear-deal-isnt-legally-binding/

From IAEA Director General's speech on Iran, the JCPOA, and IAEA:

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/director-generals-speech-on-iran-the-jcpoa-and-the-iaea

Unless Reuters and France24 can prove their reporters have access to the sensitive information IAEA does not disclose, their pieces on Iran's compliance are worthless.

 

It said they have. You can't cherry pick something and then refuse to accept the rest of what was reported.

 

Trump, as is his prerogative, pulled the US out of a pathetic deal the Ex President stupidly entered in to.

 

Both articles quoted the 2018 report issued by IAEA. I posted in response to a posters claim that the report says Iran is not in complience.

So you are saying that ocean5 is privy to information those two news agencies don't have and that they are deliberately falsifying their reporting in order to mislead readers ?

Unless you can prove Iran was not in complience, and that they are falsifying their reporting to really doesn't hold much does it - nor does truthorfiction.com

And the speech you posted isn't relevent to the report but does give some good background on how the JCPOA came about.

You should read it.

 

Compliance or not, Iran is a theocracy, and therefore has no right to existence. Wipe the btch of the map. Eradicate the cancer Iran is.