Skeptical Inquirer July/August issue on 9/11 Truth

Discussion in '9/11' started by Hannibal, Jul 6, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Which sources are you referring to?
     
  2. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Which source to you use?
     
  3. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Well, probably would have been better than that 4 frames of as "proof" 77 hit. The resolution on that is about as good as a 12 inch black and white analog tv with ice cream smeared across the screen (actually worse than that....we'd have probably been able to tell what kind of ice cream we were looking at).
     
  4. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I get in. Like "Fox" watchers?
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Almost exactly like that. You get in what?
     
  6. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Fox! A cult! You know, fantasy land tv.
     
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You get in Fox? You get in a cult? That's quite an admission.
     
  8. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes...quite.
     
  9. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It really depends on what it is I want to find out about.. I'll tell you though, it will NOT be something where the the information does NOT have any corroboration or independent evidence from OUTSIDE the source.

    In other words, I won't say something is true just because a grand total of ONE guy told me that..

    ESPECIALLY when IF TRUE, there WOULD be outside evidence, but none exists.

    If that guy only said it AFTER he was tortured, this would be even more reason to throw that out as he most likely just said it to get the torture to stop.

    If this information can't even be confirmed to come from him, and I received it second hand from a middle man, this is even worse.

    If that middle man has a history of dishonesty, and even destroyed evidence about these statements despite court orders not to, even MORE reason not to trust it.

    THAT is how my source would be different than that of the main story about the plotting and funding of 9/11 as told by the 9/11 commission.
     
  10. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Except you did the exact opposite when you said Bush posed for pictures outside of the Booker T Washington. Liar.
     
  11. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So I do that so much that the only example you've got is from over six months ago... lol.

    Keep digging up that classic gem.. Like the one time I made a mistake and admitted it.. Showing how long it is in the past since I've been wrong only shows how right I must be in the present.

    Keep up the good work, candy.
     
  12. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hey candy, I notice you followed the red herring about me, but failed to defend your precious 9/11 commission report and refute the charges against it.

    You sputtered out again... Fail.

    9/11 report is 100% right you're going to say.. And I'll just link to the thread where I disproved you about that.
     

Share This Page