This was a small private 20 some seat jet. Imagine how much more wreckage would be scattered from a real jumbo jet crash nose in? Anyone thinking flight 93 crashed as stated, is foolish. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...600MPH-falling-28-000-feet-remains-found.html
Imagine if you actually studied a crash scene rather than just assuming things using your imagination.
Why doesn't every one of these crashes look exactly the same? https://www.google.com/search?q=car...Q&biw=1271&bih=696&sei=C_3IUPKEAaWS0QHk44DYAw
Golly gee ar10 I can tell by your avatar you're really smart. I'm not and I know it. As you imply I'm "foolish". Please help me understand some dumb stuff like N345MC being a "small private 20 some seat jet" & N591UA being a "real jumbo jet". Here's a good place to start: N345MC was a 1969 Learjet model 25 (the crash you posted pics of) and no, it's not a "20 some seat" anything. N591UA was a 1996 Boeing 757-200 series (the aircraft that operated flight 93 for United Airlines on 9/11/2001) that was never a "real jumbo jet".
Golly gee ar10 I can tell by your avatar you're really smart. I'm not and I know it. As you imply I'm "foolish". Please help me understand some dumb stuff like N345MC being a "small private 20 some seat jet" & N591UA being a "real jumbo jet". Here's a good place to start: N345MC was a 1969 Learjet model 25 (the crash you posted pics of) and no, it's not a "20 some seat" anything. N591UA was a 1996 Boeing 757-200 series (the aircraft that operated flight 93 for United Airlines on 9/11/2001) and was never a "real jumbo jet". "Explain" to me/us what you think you see in the pictures so maybe I/we can "understand".
I can. The "magic" planes on 9/11 were different. Why? Because that's what the disinformation specialists say, of course!! Same old "protectors of the "official BS story for what, the fifth or 6th year here now? LOL Had to check in and see what the "team" was up to these days. Same old, same old....obviously. Remember....make sure to check with "official" BS story tellers to tell you what you saw and what you didn't see...gotta run....got another "flight to catch" and trying to leave before the other "flight catcher" shows up like clockwork. Cheerio!! (good luck Joe....you've got your work cut out for you!!)
That's a lie, I've only been here a few months. Can you guys get anything right? The planes on 9/11 weren't "magic", aside from being used as a deadly, fully fueled missile.
@ Op, I have had to clean up a helicopter crash before, and the debris was everywhere. Also saw the wreckage from a commercial airplane crash in Colorado in the 90's. Fortunately a certain number of people have had first hand experience with this, and the attempts at misinformation by the de-bunkers will be useless! This is a good angle that many might have had first hand experience with, that could change some people's minds.
July of 2012, and all you post in is 9-11 threads. nothing could undermine your credibility more then this fact!
He said 5 or 6 years, I've been here 6 months. You don't think there's difference? A few would be 6 in my book. Why would it undermine my credibility? You only post in woo bull(*)(*)(*)(*) threads, somehow that increases your credibility? I post legitimate, source confirmed information about a subject I have a considerable knowledge about. You post woo, backed up by nothing, and you're preaching to me about credibility? LoL, that's rich. Keep going guy_fawkes_mask_3.0. At least I can think on my own.
I don't have to explain crap to you, anyone with any sense knows a real person doesn't join a site 11 years after 9-11, and post in nothing but 9-11 threads. You can spin away from this all you want, but as I said before, their is nothing I could say that undermines your credibility as much as your actions do!
There are a lot of ignorant (as in uninformed) people stating what is and is not truth in aircraft accidents. I will ask you ignorant, have you ever been to a crash site?
Haha exactly why the truth movement has been spinning it's wheels for going on 13 years. I am a real person, whether you like it or not I couldn't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) less. Accuse me of whatever you'd like, but I know the truth. I have a real job, I have a real family, a real wife, real kids, and a real saturn 4 door that drives me too and from the office. I don't care about what my credibility is with people like you. The people that read my posts, and see the evidence I provide know that I have credibility. I don't expect you to feel I have any, you believe non sense that any boob posts a video about. I openly request that you despise and give me no credibility. Unknowingly, your feelings lend me credibility from others.
Well then why is it going to bother you when I post this again? This guy joined a site 11 years after 9-11, and posts in nothing but 9-11 threads!
yep so true your right,as always,the TEAM is getting frustrated,ignoring anything that doesnt go along with their version of events as well as making thrreads that dont even address the evidence and facts you present them from videos with the same old same old b.s of statements like -"youtube videos prove nothing." comedy gold afrom them as always.hee hee yeah your not missing anything as you knew you wouldnt,same old story and b.s from the TEAM alright. Here is the LATEST attempt of someone being frustrated and got desperate when he could not refute the facts and evidence in that five minute video on that thread of yours made.comedy gold.you gotta love it. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/275987-few-debunking-links.html the DEBWUNER links dont debunk a single thing,that post is obviously someone who is frustrated and desperate.the good that did come out of that thread though is Holston took the OCTA'S to school and owned them on that thread handing them their arses to them on a platter in every post they made though.hee hee.
This Guy Fawkes makes up fictions in his head using spurious logic and random bits of circumstantial evidence. Rational people call that a delusion. Why am I not surprised that a truther would be supportive of an invalid logical argument?
Why do truthers think it's cute to pronounce and spell words in ways that make no sense? Isn't that typical cult behavior? And to head back on topic, the rest of my post I'm put on my Guy Fawkes mask and pretend to be a truther for a moment: 1. There are no bodies in the pictures shown in the OP. The plane must have been remote controlled. 2. Rivera's license magically floated out of her pocket? Must have been planted. 3. One of the pilots was inexperienced. There's no way an amateur could have executed such a dive. 4. Rivera's mother and brother don't think Rivera's really dead. She obviously faked her own death. 5. It took 10 minutes to report the plane "missing" Why was the Mexican airforce standing down for so long?
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...previous-malfunction-report-article-1.1216896 Oh my. WAKE UP OCTAS This is just shoddy work by the sheeple who staged this crash. Not only is there no plane. There's not even a hole for the plane to supposedly have crashed into! At least the team in Shankytown bothered to dig a hole! [/truther rant]
And dont forget to mention that all the posts consist of in every post is a bunch of proven lies and propaganda as well.yeah pretty much proof in the pudding of somone undermining their credibility obviously. well said.
It doesn't bother me, it doesn't bother me at all in fact. Knock yourself out, if it makes you feel any better I can even put it in my signature. I won't do it in obnoxious colors or anything, but I can post that I have been here for 6 months, and I have done nothing but laid waste to truther ideas. If there was a sports or a baseball section here I'd post in that as well, like I do at JREF. There isn't, so I don't. It's 11 year after 9-11 and you're still spouting the same recycled garbage that you've been spouting for the last decade. Why is it more sketchy that I come here to debunk it than it is for you to come here and spew the venom?
So. Two pages in. All pimptight can do is whine about other people's posting habits. Can he address PSA 1771? Nope. Apparently it is too much effort to address the truth. Rtwngafraud? Nope. Just whining about "magic planes". 9/11 was an inside job? Not even close. Ar10? Nope. He can't even defend his own OP so he just posts and runs. So why is it truthers can address anything but the truth? They claim Flight 93 was fake because it couldn't look like Shanksville. Show them an instance that is spookily the same and they run like cockroaches from the light.
What? All the stuff truthers bring out is recycled garbage from before. Truthers posts consist of 1 of 3 things: 1) Rehashed garbage that has been debunked hundreds of times 2) Anti-Semitic naysaying designed to demonize a culture and blame them for all the reasons truthers have failed in their personal, business, and love lives. 3) Youboob videos consisting of grainy, bull(*)(*)(*)(*) stills that are combined with "creepy music". *yawn* Come back when you've got something worth listening too.
huh? a freaking fetus could execute a dive! What kind of jive is that? You do not think that is a bit over the top and smack in the middle of dramaqueenville? Mexican air force? Were drugs involved? LOL
debunked? Hardly! Dancing for dollars does not qualify as debunking anything. You all need to upgrade your standards. Not everyone in your audience is trench diggers and floor scrubbers with record time playing xbox. Be my guest and debunk to your hearts content. I am still laughing my ass off that debunkers and troughers have yet to figger out that 7 was a demo. I guess reality is simply to much for them to bear.
