Except furing war or to save her own life the woman has no moral right to kill another innocent human And the unborn child is innocent human life But we sre just repeating ourselves If yiu send a thousand more posts my answer will be the same
OK, so facts can't influence your opinion.... I already guessed that. I see NOW you change the goal posts again! NOW it's "moral" right. Well, YOU don't decide what's moral or not.....only the law counts Yes, if you keep insisting a woman must be punished for being raped we will keep going in circles because punishing women for being raped is NEVER good or right or decent or humane and to most people it is immoral to punish a person for another's crime. I see that you do approve of "killing innocent human life " during war....how odd....your view sure changes if you want your butt saved... ..
Uh, did you notice YOU are repeating yourself ? I stated I understand why your opinion won't change..... FoxHastings said: ↑ OK, so facts can't influence your opinion.... I already guessed that.
No it isn't. In both cases, the bodily sovereignty of one person is being violated to protect the life of another.
And that innocent human has no right to use her body to sustain its life against her will. If she wants to deny another person the use of her body, that is her right.
You are replying without replying......maybe if I could read minds I'd find out if you really had anything to say....obviously not so far except to squawck about ""assumptions, assumptions..."" Anti-Choice "argument " : ""You are making assumptions again. Do you also believe you can read minds?""" Nothing. Anti-Choice "argument" : """"""""Mac-7 said: ↑ Ok Now you have 999 more posts to repeat yourself My opinion on this will not change"""""""""""""" Nothing, too......
Aphotic said: ↑ How can you be for forcing a woman to carry a rapist's baby to term and then cutting their welfare benefits? Two questions: Why have you unearthed this old thread and What has your post got to do with the post you quoted?
