BZZZT Wrong! Those who are nefariously engaged in denying women their rights are not doing squat about "streamlining adoption procedures".
That was not an answer, it was a deflection to avoid the FACT that there are NOT "hundreds of thousands" of people wanting to adopt unwanted children.
The reek of bovine excrement is strong! TX has passed unconstitutional laws outlawing abortion that are shutting down clinics providing healthcare to women thereby resulting in increased mortality rates. That you cannot address the FACTS says volumes.
Because you fallaciously alleged that a fertilized egg has the unique "chromosomes that a born human" has in post #175 above. Your woeful grasp of the biological subject matter leaves a great deal to be desired.
Why should he? YOU have NOT proven that pregnancy does not affect women significantly or otherwise....
Great post and true....Sheesh, those whiney English who didn't stay in Europe and change their country for the better but FLED here for refuge...LOL!
Only 135,000 children are adopted each year and there are 428,000 children AWAITING adoption in foster care. https://adoptionnetwork.com/adoption-statistics FACTS are not the friends of those who blindly oppose women's reproductive rights.
As stated, the standard risk for a normal (non high risk factor pregnancy) is NOT significant. https://ask.metafilter.com/143507/How-risky-is-it-to-have-a-baby
Which shows it's not always a good option !!!! AND the process has NOTHING to do with a woman's right to choose.
If they can't then why would they if abortion was banned????? Oh YA! You claim that someday maybe, if, should, maybe, wanna, things might change in the future maybe....
So in other words, you would have no problem forcing women who get pregnent to give birth against their will. Correct? If so, what should be done to women who have abortions then? Or what if they leave the country and go somewhere abortion is legal, obtain one, and then return? Should they be held accountable?
