https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/01/poli...supreme-court-judge-carlton-reeves/index.html Absolutely amazing. But to be expected for an Obama appointee this is a bit long but scathing
The answer to his question is obvious -- if the state does not prove the restriction is question is analogous to those in effect during the late 8th cenrtury, the 2nd Amendment protects the action on question from that restriction. He just hates the fact the 2nd ,means something he doesn't like, and he has the ability to whine about it.