South Africa to change constitution to legalize taking away white farmers' land

So laws make actions right, that would otherwise be seen as wrong? Two wrongs do make a right, right? Maybe you watch too many movies?

While they left first, many returned and settled before others who had never left began to relocate and take advantage of what more civilized societies were capable of creating.

You continue to ignore the fact that much land was actually purchased from Black Africans prior to the 1913 law, thereby creating a valid title to the land occupied even though no valid title existed previously. I've never claimed the apartheid government to have been morally right, but you seem intent on claiming that ALL whites committed violent acts in acquiring their property, which in cases where true should be remedied through the Courts, not by a Constitution change applied to ALL whites.

 

As far as I can see, returning property who got stolen by a white supremacist government is right.
So there is just 1 wrong here... the crap stolen by a white supremacist government.

I dunno what you trying to do. White people came in last. You think this is up for debate or something? lol

Is that a fact? No doubt that the land purchased before 1913 was as dubious as during the apartheid era.

 

If the property was stolen then the proper solution would be to file a legal complaint and take the thief to court with the land title showing ownership. You seem to completely ignore the 'FACT' that much land was actually purchased and not stolen.

BOWI. Again you ignore the fact that all humans who populate the Earth have roots in Africa. White humans did not just emerge as a separate species in Europe. Many blacks today are more similar in appearance to Europeans than Africans, having intermixed for several generations. And perhaps that is the only way this issue is ever going to be resolved as in reality we ALL have at least one drop of African blood, perhaps even more if you've ever had to be given a transfusion.

Could it be the blacks it was purchased from didn't actually own it at all?

How would you respond if the white farmers and black farm workers, for their protection, hired mercenaries to protect them from attack since government appears unwilling to protect either their lives or their property?

Was the Manhattan Island purchase in 1626 a legal transaction?

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighth_Xhosa_War
People got ethnic cleansed all over the place before.

Ah. So all of Africa should be allowed to be in Europe according to your logic.
Or have you pushed the goalpost to the absurd?

I would respond to blow up them terrorists by the air force.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenape#Displacements

 

So we should go back and rekindle all wars of the past?

That's nonsense.

And if they have a stronger air force?

Was the Manhattan Island purchase in 1626 a legal transaction?

 

Just disproving your claim. Them people got ethnic cleansed by the governments before it became an apartheid state.

According to you it's just all one and the same. So they should be allowed.
But I see you're flip flopping on this. So it remains them white people came in last.

You go source me that if.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenape#Displacements

 

Flip flopping?