Speaking of impeachment.........

So the justices who created RvW and this "right to privacy" which has no constitutional basis could have been impeached for doing so? Wouldn't that void their ruling?

 

No. Did he commit multiple felonies in a federal court, yes. An impeachment does not determine legal guilt.

 

The Senators thought Clinton's crimes weren't high crimes nor high misdemeanors. There have been alleged crimes pinned to Trump but no proven crimes pinned to Trump.

 

He would not have settled the Trump U. fraud case if he was not guilty.

 

This is wrong. Companies and people settle all the time to avoid publicity and drawn out legal expenses.

 

Of all times to abandon partisanship.

The DEMOCRATS voted as you describe. "The Senators" is misleading.

Impeachment isn't limited to statutory crimes. Abuse of power is behind the theory of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors." Clinton didn't abuse his power. He just lied. Trump abused his power.

Since it's a political process, it requires a 2/3 vote in the Senate for removal. This has absolutely nothing to do with guilt or innocence. Guilt must be proven to a jury of one's peers, unanimously, or to a judge. Impeachment is neither.

So, a president's guilt or innocence is left to us. You can believe whatever you want, but the case presented by the Democrats was solid, both times. Indeed, Impeachment 2 returned a majority vote for removal.

 

True, but we're talking about Trump here. Trump is a celebrity. Too late to avoid publicity.

And nobody pays $25 million if they're innocent. What are the legal expenses for such a case? I don't believe they would exceed $25 mil.

 

When did Trump abuse his power?

EDIT: And an impeachment is more than a political exercise because it's also an anti-democratic exercise (since the president was voted by the EC).

 

If you didn't follow the proceedings how can you comment?

 

Thank you for ESTABLISHING that you did NOT grasp the LEGAL PRECEDENT involved in the case under discussion.

Sad!

 

Companies avoid larger legal fees by settling all the time.

 

Repeating this doesn't refute anything I wrote. Wanna try again?

True, but we're talking about Trump here. Trump is a celebrity. Too late to avoid publicity.

And nobody pays $25 million if they're innocent. What are the legal expenses for such a case? I don't believe they would exceed $25 mil.

 

There is NOTHING in the least bit DEMOCRATIC about the EC which is PROVEN by the FACT that YOUR biggest *LOSER* lost the Popular Vote in 2016.

In a GENUINE democracy he would NEVER have INFESTED the Oval Office.

The EC is an undemocratic TRAVESTY that needs to be ABOLISHED.

 

I'm sorry, which facts were used, again?

 

To say that a settlement is an admission of guilt is a non sequitur.
A settlement can be a way to save legal fees.

 

The winner of the presidential popular vote gets all the state EC votes. There's a reason why the United States of America isn't called United America (which happens to have a bunch of states).

 

Just saying it would be a non-sequitur, but I didn't just say it; I provided an argument.

You haven't countered it yet.

 

My my. If you want to argue the impeachments, have at it. Not interested in a round of 20 questions nor the Socratic method, or whatever you're doing here.

 

They did not uphold the Constitution in RvW they created and extraconstitutional right without any legal precedent and why RvW is considered one of the worst and unsupported legal decisions the court has ever released and continues to be debated today. So perhaps they should have been impeached.

 

The knew they were high crimes, multiple felonies in a federal court, the Dems just did not want to remove him. Clinton's crimes were not alleged.

 

Absolutely false, Clinton abused his power as the President first to solicit sex off White House workers then to try and pay one off with a promotion and raise. Clinton did not just lie, perjury, he obstructed justice, he suborned the perjury of another person and tampered with a witness in direct violation of the presiding judges order. ALL FELONIES, high crimes.

 

We are NOT a Democracy and guarantied by the Constitution not to be one and there is no the popular vote nationally. You nor any citizen of the USA has ever voted in a national election.

 

NOT all popular votes are EQUAL when it comes to "EC votes".

An EC vote in WY is worth 3.6 times as much as an EC vote in CA.

The EC must be ABOLISHED because it is a TRAVESTY and UNDEMOCRATIC.

 

Thank you for CONFIRMING that you did NOT grasp the LEGAL PRECEDENT involved in the case under discussion.

Sad!

 

So you can't answer............gotcha