Sri Lanka Bans Burqas and Niqabs One Week After Easter Bombings

Pray tell. Exactly what legitimate reason does the united states government have for knowing where any particular individual is at any given moment in time?

 

They gave an answer about submission to God requiring it that I didnt like anymore than the one my grandmother gave me about why d and d was devil worship. Their life, not mine. I dont make my grandma play d and d and I dont demand they show me their ankles.

 

This question makes no sense.

 

How does the presented question make no sense? It is a simple, basic question. What legitimate purpose does the united states government have, in being able to know precisely where any particular individual is at any given moment in time? Why does it need the capability to pick a citizen, any citizen, and monitor their movements throughout the day?

 

They're not doing that. Are you trying to somehow link this to burkas in Sri Lanka?

 

It's not done like that.
Face recognition programs are used in places where they are needed.
Local stores for shoplifters.
airport terminals
courtrooms,
etc. etc. etc.

 

WTF are you wibbling about?

 

What exactly has got you turned around sport?

 

That is great news; good men that are doing SOMETHING!

 

Stealing candy from a baby is evil as well. There simply are gradation on this topic. And on this topic, it's the Christians have the biggest industry build around making massacres, because they kill a heck of a lot of people all over the globe. It's obvious you don't want to hear this.

No where near France. And they wouldn't even speak French if wasn't for France making them learn it.

It's based on your idea's of deporting out any ethnicity as soon as their native nation where they originated from is no longer part of France.

Christians massacre far more out of geo-political and economical reasons.

You openly support war criminal behavior.

You get civil war when you start deporting people based on their ethnic background.

 

Except for the simple fact that they are not using their religion as justification for their actions.

 

as if massacring for the sake of power and money makes is justifiable.

 

As we all know, it's Muslims who have the monopoly on killing.

 

The Christians got the biggest armies, the biggest companies to make war machines,... and still justify nuclear bombing civilians.

 

I'm not aware of a Christian army, and nobody in Nuking civilians, or military for that mater.

somehow you think everything that is not Muslim, defaults to Christian.

 

No I don't care, I'm not christian, and don't trust my government. Doesn't change I wouldn't let my children killed because Macron is a moron. Furthermore, Hollande and Macron are atheist, a lot of western leaders aren't christian anymore, the only thing they worship is money.
I never have hidden my disgust for the corruption of western leader.
Furthermore, I would like to be enlightened, how the corruption of western leader could justificate the slaughter of some sri lankese catholic ?
What's the message behind it ? You should let Mohammed plan an attack against you because a totally unrelated guy to you is corrupted ?

Well, it's quite near France, because it's IN France. Not near metropolitan France. You're absolutly ignorant on that topic if you manage to mistaken metropolitan France and France as a whole. Furthermore, la Reunion is a place of mixed race people, everybody tend to have a little bid of every origins there.

I never spoke of deport people based on their ethnicity, a gaul which convert to islam has to be expulsed, a non muslim arab may stay.

Evil A doesn't excuse evil B. I alread gave you my opinion on interventionnism and the corruption of western so called "elite".
From my point of view, the groups which threaten the most the well-being mankind are :
1_ Islamic militia.
2_ Corruption of the governments by the industrial-financial system.
3_ Cartels and criminal organization of that kind.
The existence of 2 doesn't excuse the excuse of 3 or 1, the existence of 1 doesn't excuse the existence of 2 and 3 and the existence of 3 doesn't excuse of 2 and 1.

So what ? What's the big solution ? People should just accept to get slaughtered by jihadist ? They should just wait that enough islamic militia get enough weapons to start a civil war ? No, people will never get used as says Manuel Valls "get used to it" [get your children targeted by some degenerates].

France doesn't even do that today and is in pre-civil war state. In a few years I saw my country turned from a regular country to a place where you see everywhere soldiers patrolling the streets and the future just seems even darker.
It's the nature of islamic militia to seek for war. Everywhere they are they seek for civil war, black decade in Algeria, civil war in Lebanon, Rohingyas in Burma. Accepting "multiculturalism" is what caused that pre civil war condition.

 

Nothing was stated relating to such. It was merely pointed out that members of the christian faith are not proclaiming that their religion justifies and demands their actions. Unlike members of the islamic faith who are indeed proclaiming that their religion justifies and demands their actions.

 

I wish we could ban also ban Christianity for the harm it does to kids.

 

All religions for the harm they do to humanity.

 

Not just the biggest armies and companies but the biggest universities, the most inventions which benefit mankind, the best hospitals, the freest people and the highest standard of living. Meanwhile Muslim nations would still be living in tents and caves if it wasn't for the Christians and Jews. No free born, rational person would ever choose Islam. That's just the way it is.

 

Christianity is an option in the democracies, but not in the theocracies..

 

When carried to excess, yes, just as do political beliefs, or any strongly held beliefs. Those who murdered children attending school also had beliefs which caused them to murder, and are no different from any other fanatic. However fanaticism these days tend towards the followers of Islam.

 

Just forget it ffs! I have better things to do than play juvenile word games with you.

 

Christian fanatics are annoying.
Muslim fanatics kill people.

 

No one is playing word games. I responded in plain English.
You don't like my answer, and so the pearl clutching ensues