^ So says someone who peaked at E4, right? Did you make it that far? Career military was not a door opened to you, was it?
While I don’t doubt there might be some people on this site who believe your nonsense it is people with zero actual knowledge of the military like yourself. And stop trying to change the topic. Or quote where I gave an opinion on the civil or military leadership and commanders.
Again here is the military fantasy writer again demonstrating that he talks about things he has no idea on. Just FYI I am a still serving senior NCO with over a decade and counting within SOCOM. Nice try though.
Yeah, right. I'm not the one make a fool of himself in your asserting all knowledge of all military actions of all branches of the service flow thru you. I guess you'll have to promote yourself to being the chairman of the Joint Chiefs Of Staff. Maybe you'll have that position in the next military thread you post on?
Not allowed in the home of da fwee, home of da bwave. https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-confederacy-endures/
All we use our military for at this point is empire, endless bogus wars of occupation, and the securing of resources of others for our Wall Street/donor/“job creator” class. And despite all the shyte filled rhetoric we have partnered with Saddam, Osama, al Qaida, al Nusra, ISIS, and Wahabist Saudis.
This is the DEADLY flaw in such as the ranting on these threads that women (and others) are not combat capable - and in that operating perspective in the military then they receive essentially no combat training, while still being put in to combat zones. With that essentially being set up to fail and/or be killed, to turn around and claim that proves the claim they are not combat capable. This seems a problem across the military - and not just about women. In my opinion, anyone who may end up in a combat zone should be trained in combat skills, rather than relying solely on others or other units.
You have already made a complete fool of yourself with your thread on a subject you have no real knowledge of, or really care to understand.
The level of documented false messages - so dishonest you had to rush back and delete your message, is clear enough give you were outright in your own writing.
I've never deleted any of my messages in this thread. What is a falsehood, is thinking women in SF combat roles will make it better it more combat effective.
What these threads are showing is just how juvenile and immature many grunts truly are and were never suited for combat for it. The Marine squad leader I referred to despises the Army,. They (Marines) were on foot. They would successfully convince villagers that they had brought safety to their village from the rape, kidnapping, blackmail and other criminality of insurgents - particularly foreign insurgents. This trust could lead to gathering intel of where the insurgents were hiding as the often someone in the village would now. But then Army would drive thru the village in their Humvees shooting up homes and property with their 50 cals playing with their weapons like a bunch of drunk cowboys, destroying the trust and intel source, leading instead then to kids throwing rocks at them. He calls the Army "cowboys." In his opinion, this is one of many reasons that we will change anything in Afghanistan. As long as we stay we can control any area we dominate by force. But they hate us and have good reasons too - so accordingly also reject all our ways. So the day after we leave they go back to exactly as before. The same juvenile mindset of the "bro brotherhood" is a severe failure of selection and training.
Oh I would never even consider serving in the military's occupation of and slaughter within foreign lands for the Wall Street/donor/"job creator" classes’ access to the resources of other nations.
The female I have posted about has never experienced any sexual harassment in terms of any sexual inuendo or contact. Rather, it is ranges from little quips and dumping workload on women more than men, to rarely outright being told no female is welcome in the unit. She has no problem with it because they are irrelevant to her and just psychologically insecure losers. However it can be difficult for some women to handle. Feeling excluded from the sense of comradery and cohesion can lead to a sense of vulnerability. Accordingly to her, 100% of the time it is a WHITE man and has led to a black men getting in the white man's face very physically - for which the white will cowardly back away, including facing a lower ranking black men. Apparently in some mission roles rank it virtually irrelevant. However, there also is a logic involved in how that would work. A white officer would not want to face an investigation against a black officer, even lower rank, if it was over the ranking white officer harassing a female officer. However, the female officer dare not make any complaint as she loses on that regardless of any finding. It will take a full military generation to finally lose the dead weight and drag of juvenile and psychologically stunted men from the US military.
Remeber when the Obama White House and liberals were claiming that seals were to white ? Must be land lubbers, every seal I ever saw in my life time was black. Then I discovered that the Obama administration was referring to the U.S. Navy's SEAL's (Sea, Air, and Land) Under PC social engineering in the name of diversity the Obama administration wanted to lower the standards of the Navy SEAL's because to many whites were serving with SEAL Teams. One of the requirements for becoming a Navy SEAL you have to be a really strong swimmer big time. The reason why the only black seals you see are on the beach in the harbors who don't wear a uniform. Blame it on nature but most blacks can't swim. Those who can swim aren't strong swimmers and unlike whites who can float in water with little arm or leg movement treading waters, blacks sink like a rock. That's why you rarely if ever see a black Navy SEAL. But in the name of political correctness the Obama administration wanted to lower the standards where blacks could serve as Navy SEAL's and not have to be able to swim. They just wanted to lower the standards for blacks, not for everyone else. But you can't do that or your admitting that one group is inferior to another so you have to lower the standards for everyone.
The denser muscles and bones are, the heavier they are per body volume. However, setting standards low enough for white men to be able to compete with black men doesn't seem a problem to the military. Anytime I have suggested for those roles where strength is what matters, then who passed should be based upon a competition between all - and the winners are whoe gets it. However, for physical strength measures, that favors black men - so no white men on the forum ever accept that concept (negating the claim that the fastest/strongest is necessary). Nor are they agreeable to segregating women and men in combat units to use most suitable to their sex/gender, because that also messes with their women-are-worthless-in-combat grunting as well. The logic and reasoning is 100% reversed based upon whether it favors white men or favors men over women.
Whenever I wish to learn more about the black community, I always turn to some backwater inbred racially hung up jackass who knows nothing about it.