Take their weapons away for Christ's sake, you vicarious psychopaths. You grant immorality to an entity representing a non-majority (as most people voted for NO ONE). You think because they are majority-elected that they should hold powers that trump natural law. You grant them the right to kill, steal, and throw people into cages. Anyone who supports the notion of a democracy or a state is a psychopath and does not deserve a weapon. There's your gun control. 260 million killed by their own government in the 20th century. Uncountable the number killed by other nations in the wars for nothing. Scales, state-corporate media, scales. Those propaganda centers will never tell the truth..about anything.
disarm the states and the statists. problem solved. This gunrunning banker-representing, non-prosecuting head of the DOJ is going to decide who is dangerous? You have to be (*)(*)(*)(*)ing kidding me. You do not give up any ground or weapons to an obviously criminal government. Obama is a big-banker-big-pharm-big-insurance begging Manchurian piece of (*)(*)(*)(*). Take his guns.
Let me preface my commentary: I am a statist. I agree with the founding fathers when they wrote: Saying this, a classic definition of politics is (paraphrasing) "the study of force exerted by a group against the individual within societies". this is one of my favorite definitions, as I think it places into the definition a stark reality that most people do not bring themselves to think about: force. Force against people; sons, and fathers, mothers and daughter- children and the helpless in society.It is exerting the will of the collective against the will of the individual and whether those wills fall on a breech of morality is something most do not consider. Consider this: no one individual is the perpetrator of atrocities against freedoms and liberties in the history of mankind to scale of government, and by extension societies. Jeffrey Dahmer had nothing on the Third Reich nor Haigh on the USSR or even Bundy on the United States. Many have seen me declare taxes as being immoral, and I have seen nothing successfully argued otherwise. No individual has the moral high ground to bestow upon the Community rights that they would not otherwise have, such as theft (taxation) or murder (the death penalty and abortion). No one has been able to argue logically otherwise, not the Georgist, the Communists, Marxist or Capitalist. Know this, the state is historically the single biggest violator of human rights. The state has historically murdered more people. The Killing Field. Khmer Rouge. Pox invested blankets, the Holocaust. Millions upon million of people slain in the name of government. Russia, China, Germany, Italy and the United States. None are exempt. These are all reasons why government MUST be limited to only those tools that protect individual rights: the army, the courts and the police. Funding must be minimal becasue with money comes power. Size must be minimal, becasue with size some power. The concept of the social contract MUST be abolished and replaced with the proper individual contract law, and association must be voluntary to the society and not MANDATORY as it is now. This will limit these situation from occurring as much a possible and maximize freedom. Because it is all about force, after all. :
What you post is good but minarchism makes no sense to me. We can't trust government to anything right or to ever act justly over matters with their monopoly of coercion. So why hand the most important functions of society to them? Maybe we should give them simple things..
