From here (the Daily Kos): Strike Down GOP Gerrymandering Excerpt: Well worth the read if you are concerned about having, finally, a Real Democracy in America. That is, one without the voting manipulations of either the Electoral College (that has elected Five Presidents who lost the popular-vote) or Gerrymandering of the popular-vote. A True Democracy elects the will of the voting public purely and simply without manipulations of who, where, why or how votes are counted. And, frankly, not only for voting, the US needs an at-birth Identity Card for all its citizens that contains a DNA-identification. This is the mainstay of any European Democracy and, so far, nobody or no party in the EU has "taken over complete control" of the government as was once feared under Communism. In truth, the EU is the ONLY truly Social Democracy, the definition of which is this: *Definition = justice/fairness/equitability in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society.
"Strike Down GOP Gerrymandering" And leave Democrat gerrymandering in place? And again the Constitution guarantees we will never be a Democracy. Are you a US citizen?
Excellent article by Daily Kos. Once the Republican gerrymandering is ended, we will have real democracy at work. Patriotic Dems at the helm means a better USA and it is good to see such actions taking place.
In my opinion, all gerrymandering is harmful unfair and counter to the way our country should be operating, regardless of who's doing it. Its high time that we implement a solid policy which fixes the issue once and for all. We either need to agree to a standard automate-able algorithm for drawing districts, or set up clearly defined standards by which traditionally drawn districts can be measured for fairness, or forgo districts all-together and move to a Single Transferable Vote system. Agreed?? Ranked Vote: How To Reform Redistricting And End Political Gerrymandering -Meta
I seriously doubt that. The Daily Koss is not a pre-paid site. Though they do ask for contributions. Anyway, try again, here: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...rike-down-GOP-gerrymandering?detail=emaildksp PS: Do try to respond to a comment by quoting it, so readers know to whom you are directing your response ...
And consider the alt-left Progressive DailyKos doesn't mention Dem gerrymandering. Consider California. New Democratic Party gerrymandering has resulted in California sending 43 New Democratic Party members/votes to the House. Yet, no hardcore Progressive "news" site talks about that. How many House seats does the North Carolina have in total? 13. Fake propaganda BS from Progressive sites like DailyKos should always be ignored.
Ouupps! But, you see, I thought I was responding to a response and when I clicked on the link it was your post that came up .... I can't imagine why - but after a lifetime in Computing, I am still not the least bit surprised ...
Propaganda, me arse. Opinion is the proper word, and if you don't like it find another. But "propaganda" it is not. I suggest you see what pops up when you do a search on these two words "Republican Propaganda", (with the quotation marks). Wow ... !
?? Wait... then are you saying that you don't think gerrymandering is a problem that should be fixed? ...or are you just saying you don't think the fix should be Single Transferable Vote since that gets rid of local districts? If you're just saying you don't think the fix should be Single Transferable Vote,...then what is your opinion on using an algorithm to draw the districts, or establishing clear and universal standards for how fair districts should be drawn? -Meta
I think States need to decide how their districts are drawn. I don't think there is a universal formula that will work for all States.
So you're OK with states continuing the practice of gerrymandering then?? Why exactly do you think a set of fairness standards, or an algorithm wouldn't work for every state??? -Meta
Because some States are like Alaska and other States are like Rhode Island. Each state is a laboratory. Each state should decide how their district lines are drawn. Some can use courts some can use algorithms. I believe what you are advocating is like Gerry mandering the entire country.
And... ? What exactly is leading you to believe that would be an issue?? Explain to me why something like the Square-Rectangle Method or the Ring Method wouldn't be compatible with Rhode Island??? Explain to me how a Proportionality Ratio Standard couldn't apply in a place like Alaska which only has a single district???? -Meta
It just seems that you complain about Gerry mandering on one hand while trying to devise a scheme to gerrymander the entire country with 1 system with the other. Why do you want to "take the power" away from the States to decide how their districts are drawn?
See what I bolded? See my answer? Algorithm's are interesting but who writes the algorithm and what is weighed and by how much. Clear UNIVERSAL standard as in a federal statute? Unconstitutional.
If you believe that establishing systems to ensure that congressional elections are fair and that districts are not drawn to favor one party or group over another is akin to gerrymandering, then I think you misunderstand the meaning of the term gerrymandering. gerrymander 1 : to divide or arrange (a territorial unit) into election districts to give one political party an electoral majority in a large number of districts while concentrating the voting strength of the opposition in as few districts as possible... 2 : to divide or arrange (an area) into political units to give special advantages to one group... https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gerrymander#h2 -Meta
If that's how some States want to do things let them do it that way. In some States it's used to keep communities that are in a geographical area unified as a single voice rather then being split. Forcing the nation on to a single system could have unintended consequences
We decide together on which algorithm we view as the fairest. And like I was saying in that other thread, after that it doesn't matter who writes the program to automate that algorithm, as anyone would then be able to verify that the program was written correctly and yielded the correct results. This is a major advantage of using algorithms over leaving it to people to directly draw the maps. -Meta
I'm not saying it needs to be the federal government that does this. But that said, there is nothing at all in the constitution which precludes congress from passing anti-gerrymandering laws. Apportionment sections of the constitution merely specify how many congressional seats each state must be afforded. -Meta