Study finds that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant

I Googled this: https://www.utoronto.ca/news/tags/climate-change
https://www.utoronto.ca/news/u-t-joins-coalition-leading-universities-driving-climate-action

 

Can't you read?

Many universities have climate change departments making profit of climate change like tobacco industry were making profit if tobacco.

These department do not have experts on warming and heat and mass exchange.

And they are no more qualified on the subject than proctologist, urologist and gender study professor.

Read first.

CC is multi billion, if not trillion $$ business, all corporations, oil, coal companies make profit on it.

Google university of toronto - you will see no synopsis on AWG.

Look through the schools https://www.utoronto.ca/academics/programs-directory

and find a single qualified school with the claimed synopsis.

 

Well gee. What a conspiracy involving all 3400 plus accredited universities in the world, 81 of the largest corporations in America and every govt. on earth. You guys are so smart to see through the conspiracy promoted by the smartest elements in the entire scientific community. You know, the same guys who work to save your asteroid with Every new discovery

 

Should I wait for 2 more replies to same post not addressing a single statement of the post?

 

You might as well. It will keep you from making stuff up.

 

what did I ever make up?

 

>Many universities have climate change departments making profit of climate change like tobacco industry were making profit if tobacco.<

That’s BS. Universities do make money for their research, education and advisory for industry and the gov. But it’s legitimate science.
Name one that makes money “selling” death and lies. They have reputations for ligit science. Only Someone who traffics in lies for political purposes would make such a statement.
You have no idea what ligitimate science is ......do you ?

 

Waiting for the 3rd quote out of the context and without addressing the facts quoted.

 

Your BS is facts ? . Show the reference. I’m still Waiting for a reference that supports your claim that colleges engage in activities that support unhealthy products like cigarrette smoking. Yours is a baseless claim. Show a reference and I’ll respond with one. Otherwise, you’re just flapping your gums trying to pretend you know what institutes of higher learning support.

 

Your claim that all universities have AWG on their websites – BS

Your claim that all institutions of higher learning which produce experts on the subject have AWG on their website – BS

Your claim that theories involving, warming heat and mass need to be accepted by proctologists, gynecologists and professors of gender study – BS

Your claim that above mentioned vote on such theories – BS

You claim that AGW hoax is not multibillion business - BS

Your claim that corporations, including universities even slightly care about the environment and not about profit – BS

Your claim that if they don’t feed the AWG hoax all climate scientists will not go belly up – BS.

For shortness, I have not listed your other BS claims.

 

I challenged you every time you make this bogus claim. You give me a particular ACCREDITED university of your choice. I’ll find it. You can’t even google the sites correctly to find them. Go for it ! Tell me an accredited university. All you do is claim “ you” can’t find the sites. It’s not my fault you’re computer challenged and don’t know how.

Here’s 81 of the top companies dufus.
http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdige...erican-business-act-on-climate-change-pledge/

 

I am getting worried about you, woman.

I am afraid of hurting you.

Here is one particular ACCREDITED university out of a number of sites I randomly googled AND POSTED HERE:

http://politicalforum.com/index.php...ot-a-pollutant.526021/page-46#post-1069655809

 

http://www.cgcs.utoronto.ca/

You deem AGW research like cigarette companies?

 

So what’s your point ? You just showed me an article reference that the university of Toronto signed on with other universities in a program that supported AGW. You just showed you are really strange. You just dissed yourself.

https://www.utoronto.ca/news/u-t-joins-coalition-leading-universities-driving-climate-action

 

Oh woman, if you were not a blond with blue eyes....

Google "university of toronto" - you will see no synopsis on AWG.

Understand?

Yes?

No?

Look through the schools https://www.utoronto.ca/academics/programs-directory

and find a single qualified school with the claimed synopsis.

http://politicalforum.com/index.php...ot-a-pollutant.526021/page-46#post-1069655809

What do I claim?

I claim that if climate scientists (and climate change departments of the universities) don’t feed the AWG hoax all climate scientists would go belly up.

True or false?

What else do I claim?

 

One item at a time.
Let’s define “ synopsis”
>brief summary or general survey of something.<
The reference YOU gave does indeed summary what the scientists of U of T are doing and what they support. That’s called a “synopsis.”
Read your own reference. ANY. Accredited university supplies this information.

Give us another university.

Btw, did you read the list of 81 major companies ?
Let’s pick one....UPS/ climate change

Here’s what we find
https://pressroom.ups.com/pressroom...e?ConceptType=FactSheets&id=1426321539361-367

Read it. You get a brief “ synopsis” of what UPS is doing to deal with climate change.

 

You pretending you really aren’t that bright ?
If you’re looking for the university of Toronto’s statements on climate change and typing in “climate change” is too difficult, you can always use the search function on the university’s main page.
It looks like this, Q .
Unv. are big scary places. Ever been to one ?

 

Dang! I looked for a synopsis on "math": https://www.utoronto.ca/academics/programs-directory?field_degrees_value=1&query=+math

I bet they just snuck that one "synopsis" in there hoping no one would realize that math is a big money making hoax.

 

In the minds of trumpets, any math used beyound maximizing your return on your tax deductions, is a hoax.

 

Oh girls, I am sorry. I just asked to another believer in evolution to post the text of the scientific method, she posted, I asked her- is it the text, she said, - it a synopses, I asked her - did I ask you to post a synopses, she said - I posted the text.
My head was spinning and I did not realize that you would have to look up synopses, I thought all believers in evolution knew what was that.


There is a corporate web site, then there is a web site of the R&D department of the corporation, then there is a financial department website, then there is the advertisement and marketing department website, then there is a AWG section of the A&M department web site.

I just pointed that no corporate or R&D website has anything about AWG on their site and that R&D department has no participation in what the financial department and the A&M department have decided to make money on.

I pointed that only gender, African, European studies and AWG departments of any University, Inc. support AWG.
I pointed that no department of any University, Inc. producing experts on warming supports AWG.
Do you understand the difference between a website of a corporation and website of a division of the marketing department of the corporation?


You claim that a physical theory becomes true only when a proctologist, urologist, professors of gender and African/European studies somehow vote for it.

You claim that all corporations, including Universities, Inc care about environment and not about profits in the first place.

You claim that all climate scientists working in marketing and advertisement departments of AWG would not loose their houses, cars, and lavish lifestyles if the AWG hoax gets thrown away.

I am just laughing at your naïve and having no connection to the reality claims .


The AWG hoax is imposed by the inter government panel with the publicly pronounced goal of redistribution of wealth, where governments will take money from people who earn money, use 90% of the money for themselves, their relatives and friends, for marketing and advertisement scientists, and give 10% to those who do not work for voting them in.

Note that AWG marketing and advertisement scientists in difference from tobacco scientists bear absolutely no responsibility for any outcome.

I remember when they announced in an IPCC report no more snow and cold winters in Europe and the next harsh snowy winter killed more than 400 people in Europe and all scientists only got pay raise and promotions.

Another example is GE inventing the fluorescent light bulbs nobody wanted to buy, investing in advertising AWG through belonging to it MSM and through “lobbing”, and then the government makde you to pay GE triple for those bulbs.
Inhaling the 2nd hand smoke is not OK with you, but inhaling mercury from the bulbs is OK?


There is no science, no rationality in the hoax whether it is AWG, or GW, ACC or CC, but only the lowest and darkest sides of human nature - greed, profit, lust for power, death, - multiplied by ignorance of the general public consistently demonstrated by those who argue for or against or in the middle of the GW/CC hoax.

 

Ha ha
Now you don’t believe in evolution and AGW . You’re two for two . Don’t stop there, tell us how all vaccines, antibiotics and the newest cancer cures were developed without using natural selection and evolutionary theories. One of the key foundations of biology is evolution. You’re such a smart guy. You know more then Harvard medical center, the US military and Pfizer Inc. wow......just wow.
I guess small pox just stopped killing millions all by itself.
Btw, you’re still embarrassing yourself by admitting you don’t know how to use the search function on web sites.
No AGW, no evolution and now you’re computer illiterate.
Three for three !

 

You were home schooled ?

 

I told you girls, I only believe in God and I do not have any other beliefs.

You keep on demonstrating that you have a myriad of most ridiculous beliefs on top of those I outlined in the post you quoted.

And you all act like zombies brainwashed and stamped in the same factory.

Here I am addressing some of your ridiculous beliefs:

http://politicalforum.com/index.php...volution-redux.504291/page-69#post-1069596517
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...volution-redux.504291/page-69#post-1069596602
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...volution-redux.504291/page-70#post-1069599877
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...volution-redux.504291/page-71#post-1069603504
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...volution-redux.504291/page-72#post-1069612636
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...volution-redux.504291/page-73#post-1069628284

 

No, I grew up as an atheist among all atheists, was brainwashed in the belief in evolution by atheists in a public school and the first time saw the Bible when I was 18 or so.
Fistfights on school brakes did not pass me and girls liked me all the time.
Luckily, I received an excellent secondary education, and luckily, I majored in thermodynamics where no beliefs were allowed.
Pure luck.

Another thing was that when I was 13 I scientifically proved to an old and uneducated lady that there was no God.
I guess she kept on praying for me.
Pure luck.
Wish you the same.

 

But you sit there typing on your computer/ iPad, accepting all that science has given you without a thought. I believe that science is the source of the best ideas man has ever had. It doubled your life expectancy since it was applied to medicine, won wars and is the reason you’re comunicating in a forum and not sitting there staring at your navel.