Stumping a "Racial Realist"

Discussion in 'Race Relations' started by DarkSkies, Oct 24, 2018.

  1. DarkSkies

    DarkSkies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    4,522
    Likes Received:
    583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]

    You are the one who shared the links with all those races in them remember? I pulled all your definitions off from the links you gave in (#2,3,4,5). -_-

    Why don't you renounce your links if you are unhappy with what is in them? Better yet, use your own words for the "base races" and what determines them instead of copy pasting links.
     
  2. Taxonomy26

    Taxonomy26 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2016
    Messages:
    1,611
    Likes Received:
    1,237
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you have NO rebuttal to the FACT that the Third Term chart you claimed as backing you was just a chart of BASE RACES (BLUE, GREEN, RED), and their MIXES among meaning POLITICAL boundaries, and because of Colonization/Importation (by/of Black and Euros in this case).
    Game over #702.

    Your Disingenuous last wording only means more Humiliation.
    (and your juvenile loser cartoon/distraction/Trolling unquoted by me)
    You've lost/"Were Stumped" a dozen times.
    I defined race scientifically and with esteemed sources,
    while you disingenuously and continuously tried to conflate with social usage.

    `
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  3. DarkSkies

    DarkSkies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    4,522
    Likes Received:
    583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm simply correcting your mischaracterizations. I have already taken the races you provided from the links you shared at the beginning of the thread. The races you shared just happens to be sociopolitical races and you don't like it. If you wanted to renounce any of the links you shared, you could have just said so.

    The exercise was to get you to see how flawed your religion of race realism is. If you are finally having issues with what is exposed about your belief, then my job is done here.

    Take care Tax. As entertaining as you would be on any other topic, I'm done with you on this.
     
  4. Taxonomy26

    Taxonomy26 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2016
    Messages:
    1,611
    Likes Received:
    1,237
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IOW, and again, you've been GUTTED by me and have NO answer to My Scientific definitions of Race, nor your disingenous post after post.
    Race Denialist "STUMPED."
    You lost a dozen times but persisted last-word trolling hoping I went away.
    So Solly.
    I don't go away.
    I keep holding your Lies and twists up for derision.
    `
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  5. crank

    crank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    54,812
    Likes Received:
    18,482
    Trophy Points:
    113
    why would you do that?
     
  6. crank

    crank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    54,812
    Likes Received:
    18,482
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They do the same with many animal species. ESPECIALLY those which breed easily with domestic versions of themselves. Wild dogs, for example. They've very big on keeping the lines 'pure'. Interesting, isn't it.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  7. Taxonomy26

    Taxonomy26 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2016
    Messages:
    1,611
    Likes Received:
    1,237
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just another DarkSkies SOCIAL/COLLOQUIAL-Usage distraction.
    Intentionally ambiguating the thread he lost and Scientific definition.

    No one denies there are mixes.
    ie, African American 'Blacks' are on Average 75% sub-Saharan/25% Euro.
    this doesn't negate the two Races that constitute that mix.
    `
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  8. crank

    crank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    54,812
    Likes Received:
    18,482
    Trophy Points:
    113
    People who are 50/50 are neither black nor white. If anything, they're both. Standing politically on one side or the other is a negation of the other parent's value, history, culture, traditions, extended family, and input.
     
  9. DarkSkies

    DarkSkies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    4,522
    Likes Received:
    583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not my rule. However, it is a social rule that has been around for generations and is why people here continue to class people this way.
     
  10. crank

    crank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    54,812
    Likes Received:
    18,482
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "social" means people. which people (ie, mixed race couples) are teaching their kids to identify with one side and ignore the other?
     
  11. DarkSkies

    DarkSkies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    4,522
    Likes Received:
    583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Society is. Parents, others, everyone who is used to terming people a certain way. Some people try to resist it, but ultimately it's a social viewpoint.
     
  12. crank

    crank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    54,812
    Likes Received:
    18,482
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only if people (aka, society) teach us to hold that viewpoint, and we agree to carry it forward. IOW, it's not really a matter of 'trying' to resist - it's a matter of just resisting. Don't buy into it, regardless of what the other guy does.
     
  13. Taxonomy26

    Taxonomy26 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2016
    Messages:
    1,611
    Likes Received:
    1,237
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, And?
    I acknowledge Mixes of Races.
    I named one Recent Admixture - African American - many times in this thread (including my last post/WTF) and Many/Most others.
    I many times explained that calling them "Black" was COLLOQUIAL usage, not scientific Race.
    'Black' is not a Race, it's a nickname/colloquialism for any person of significant brown color.

    Australian Aborigines would be called "Black" COLLOQUIALLY on the streets of America, but they are not the same Race as the sub-Saharan group.
    Dozens of times explained exactly this in most threads here.

    I can't help it if have no understanding of my position after seeing and being in many threads debated in this section.
    You learned nothing.
    Or maybe you forgot where you got the little you know.
    `
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  14. Splash Master

    Splash Master Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2018
    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Gender:
    Male
    The 19th century definition is ancestry.
     
  15. Splash Master

    Splash Master Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2018
    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Gender:
    Male
    I noticed that too. They use the race concept to make a chart claiming there are no races. Laughable.
     

Share This Page