Supreme Court blocks Louisiana abortion law on 5-to-4 vote

It does not now and NO, it never will....No fetus can sit on a shelf and grow on it's own....YOU are talking about artificial wombs....BUT if the fetus is a separate entity from the woman, not affecting her body in any way, THEN it DOES NOT NEED A WOMB

Total irrelevancy.

 

Zealots with their intrusive Big Government agenda are hellbent upon politicians and Washington bureaucrats seizing control of wombs and criminalizing a woman making personal choices in consultation with her caregivers, spiritual advisors, and loved ones.

Once such freedom is surrendered, the State can require abortions as well as forbid them.

 

I've never made that claim. Once again you are debating in bad faith.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
OH! ANOTHER CHANGE to the narrative!! NOW it's the "adoptive parents who pay" and not YOU!

The old excuse, "I got caught and so I'll call it "semantics" ….LOL!!!

 

As soon as he keeps his repeated vow to come clean with his tax returns?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Maybe YOU don't but YOU don't determine other's lives....

No, I don't.....I leave that up to women to decide if they want to gestate or not...it IS their decision.

BUT those who want to ban abortion DO want to determine other's lives...

 

False, his narrative was never that he personally would have to pay.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Yes, illegal abortions can be, and have been, life threatening and deadly . All the more reason to have safe accessible clinics.

Ya, and they have so much "respect for life" ...unless it's a woman's...

 

No, I don't.....I leave that up to women to decide if they want to gestate or not...it IS their decision.

BUT those who want to ban abortion DO want to determine other's lives...[/QUOTE]

No YOU are determining those babies CAN be killed.

 

Stubborn uninformed ad hominem nonsense is not very persuasive.
Read the actual definition of genocide and then offer some substantive rebuttal - if you can.

"GENOCIDE:

English Language Learners Definition of genocide
: the deliberate killing of people who belong to a particular racial, political, or cultural group
See the full definition for genocide in the English Language Learners Dictionary
genocide noun
geno·cide | \ ˈjen-ə-ˌsīd \

Medical Definition of genocide
: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group
— compare HOMICIDE
Other Words from genocide
genocidal \ ˌjen-ə-ˈsīd-ᵊl \ adjective
genocide noun
geno·cide | \ ˈje-nə-ˌsīd \

Legal Definition of genocide
: acts committed with intent to partially or wholly destroy a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group
also : the crime of committing such an act"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/genocide

Note that "force" or "forcing" is not part of any definition of genocide. Let that soak in for a while - genius.

 

Good post and points that Anti-Choicers want to desperately avoid having aired......

 

No YOU are determining those babies CAN be killed.[/QUOTE]



NO, I NEVER SAID "BABIES" can be killed....those are YOUR words...

 

NO, I NEVER SAID "BABIES" can be killed....those are YOUR words...[/QUOTE]

Forget our political differences but could you at least learn how to properly compose posts here?

 

Forget our political differences but could you at least learn how to properly compose posts here?[/QUOTE]

************************************************************************************
That last line is YOURS Dayton ..
BOY! That was sure screwed up and I only quoted your post


Why do you have a "quote" in the middle of that post ?


NOW your excuse is that posts aren't properly composed ? HILARIOUS !!!!


Is post 538 "properly composed"? With a quotation mark in the middle?

 

Carrying & birthing a baby is a long, hard process for any woman to go thru, but a living hell for a rape victim. It scars them mentally & emotionally for life. Pro-Lifers demonstrate a powerful lack of compassion in their narrow, myopic views on abortion, when they dwell entirely on the rights of the fetus, but totally ignore the rights or suffering endured by the mothers. That's altogether too one-sided for me.

 

So you are not willing accept ANY of the physical or mental risks that a pregnant women endures, but you are willing to force her to go through them.
Got it.

 

How is he determining the baby's life if that decision is up to the mother? He has not forced his will on her in any way.

 

And since ANY and ALL pregnancies come with the risk of possible death to the mother - why are you trying to force possible death on her?

 

Forcing kids to go to school has the possibility of causing death - why are you trying to force death upon them?

No one is saying that if the mothers life is in danger abortion is not appropriate, strawman.

 

By determining it should be allowed.

 

A rape victim can take medication to prevent any preganacy and of all abortions they are less than 1%. How is compassion advocating the killing of babies?

 

The purpose of an abortion is to kill the baby that was conceived. Else why have the abortion?

 

Being Pro-Choice is NEVER "advocating the killing of babies." Being Pro-Choice is advocating HAVING THE FREEDOM to make these crucial choices in your life for yourself, based on your individual circumstances.

 

No, it's to kill the fetus. The erroneous term "baby" is YOUR word.....and has nothing to do with facts or science.

I will NOT get into another back-and-forth with you over terminology....

Abortion will never be banned by anyone screaming "Baby ! Baby !

 

NO one is advocating killing babies.