Tea Party Is Bald-Faced Racists, White Privilege Conference Speaker Tells White ppl

Phony narrative, distortions, lies & propaganda. Anything to smear any opposition to their socialist agenda. The progressive left is anti American & anti freedom. Their agenda leads to oppression. No thinking American should be deceived by their lies.

This is just another caricature of those who want American liberty. They keep the propaganda mill running at full speed, hoping to deceive low information voters to elect more of these looters & scoundrels into our governance.

 

There is a huge difference with having a political opinion that opposes the policies and agenda of a political leader and hatred of that leader. We've seen unrestricted and self-proclaimed hatred of President Obama completely unrelated to policies and agenda that can only be ascribed to racist hatred by the Tea Party movement.

For example today we still have those in the "Tea Party" movement claiming that Obama's economic policies are destroying the economy but when Obama took office the "Bush Recession" drove the DOW down to about 8,000 and unemployment to over 10% but today unemployment is below 6% and the DOW is at about 18,000.

Now I don't agree with all of President Obama's economic policies but to claim that he's destroyed the economy is a blatant lie and the underlying reason for the lie is hatred based upon racism.

 

Anti-discrimination legislation is anti-discrimination legislation by definition.

The fact that the legislation refers to and attempts to correct historic racial and/or gender discrimination does not make it racist.

The 15th Amendment was based upon "race" where blacks were historically denied the right to vote. Does the 15th Amendment reflect "racism by authority" or does it represent "anti-discrimination by authority" is a question you need to ask yourself?

 

LOL, just more BS from another Obama sycophant. Obama is disastrous for Amerca. The DOW did not recover but was 'saved' by Fed pumping. The unemployment rate is completely divorced from the reality on the street.

 

What is this 'white privilege' crap, anyway? That is nothing but racism. Instead of following MLKs dream of healing, & content of character, these race hustlers keep dividing & pitting us against each other. They are enemies of American unity, & only bring violence & destruction.

 

And how does any of that prove blacks are discriminated against strictly because of their race? It doesn't. Unless the study asks did you not hire people because they were black the study has too many factors to prove there is racism. Were they dressed appropriately for the interviews? How did they answer the gotcha questions? How qualified were all the applicants really? Did they have tattoos, piercings that could turn off HR? Did every black applicant fit in with the corporate culture? If your speech pattern on an interview intimates that you have some inner city in you, white or black you could have problems in corporate America. Just saying.

We denied an applicant recently because even though he was a very talented designer, he spoke very "street" which could rub clients the wrong way and cause people to question his responsibility and intelligence. By the way, he was white.

We denied a female applicant because she wasn't strong enough to carry some gear on her own which makes her a liability if she had to work solo. Were not buying all new gear just to make her life easier. There were plenty of other candidates that were as good as she was but without that check against her. Pass. She was also white. Did we tell her? No. But we don't have to.

 

Yes, it is true, the assumption IS - ALL people with lighter skin are racists.
As a result, we have racists laws that discriminate against paleface people.
In some countries name of those programs is more honest, they called it positive discrimination.

No matter how you twist it, those programs are racists, since they favor certain race, in the employment, in education, in social benefits.
Now the worst part of the program that it punishes paleface immigrants twice, first time because they are white, second time because they are immigrants and can't compete with blacks or women.
Those people are not part of the historic discrimination or slavery, but you discriminate against them any way.
Historic discrimination is not an excuse anymore, since those days long gone. If you want a revenge then you have to file a lawsuit individually.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/white-privilege-real-now-research-prove-184105763.html

One fact is apparent about the Tea Party movement and that is that they live in a "racist bubble" and continue to spread propaganda that originates in racist hate groups like Stormfront.

"White privilege doesn't exist" and "Affirmative Action creates reverse-discrimination" are just two examples of the fallacies that originated with anti-black racist hate groups . We can only question the Tea Party movement when it claims it's not racist by asking them then why do they spread racist propaganda that originates in racist hate groups?

 

Not quite accurate because racism is and has always been predominately associated with right-wing social conservative political ideologies.

 

Who cares where it comes from, it is anti-white racism

Most of the lefts policies have roots dating back to their Bolshevik past. Does that mean you support another murderous purge?

 

In the 1950's and 1960's the majority of blacks voted for Republicans but with the transition of the "racist right-wing social conservatives" of the South abandoning the Democratic Party and becoming Republicans around 1980, like the racists right-wing social conservatives, the black vote switched from supporting the Republican Party to supporting the Democratic Party.

Is it any wonder that Blacks support a party opposed to racism as opposed to a party of racism?

 

All of the applicants were the identical except for the color of their skin including dress, mannerisms, interview skills, etc. because this was a scientific study that would have nullified itself if all of these considerations had not been accounted for. These types of studies are crafted by people with PhD's that know exactly what needs to be done to create an accurate scientific study. There are literally post graduate courses that deal exclusively with how to create these type of studies so that accurate results are obtained.

In point of fact you never ask a person any direct questions when they're a member of a study group. Merely suggesting that the researches should have asked the hiring managers if they disqualified the person because of race would have invalidated the study. To make the suggestion that they should have asked the hiring management this question reflects a complete ignorance of how a valid scientific study is conducted.

Here's how you know if a study is valid. Is there another study that contradicts the results? If not then the study is a valid study because all of these studies are subjected to peer review and every questionable study is subjected to additional studies to see of the results are consistant. It's been 12 years since the EPI study on hiring discrimination and in that time period not a single study has contradicted it's results.

 

I always found that interesting that he could get away with calling him self that. Considering that he was the governor of Arkansas. No offense to the people of that state on this forum. Been there once in person and had a hard man that ran a farm down there and was very unimpressed how black people are treated there. I was there in 93 I believe for training on the last day there a bunch of the Sargeants put on their street cloths to go down town for the evening while they were at Taco Bell they where stopped by a police officer who told them to get back to base because he could not guarantee thier safety. This 1993 I mean come on. In the early 2000 my hired man was living in Arkansas running a farm, he had bunch of local farmers come and tell him that he was paying the n*****s to much. Tell me people how can a man that was Govenor of that state and stuff like that happens how bad was it befor he was gov or just how little did he do for the black people of the state.

 

It was coined by a popular black writer, Toni Morrison.

 

I've decided not to post in these kinds of hate threads. Promoting a narrative, instead of seeking truth & solutions is propaganda. it only feeds the division & destruction of America, & i will not contribute to that. I know every other thread is about race in here, and the message of the race hustlers & propagandists fills the interwebs. But it is a lie, & only furthers division, suspicion, & destruction, while greedy politicians & money shufflers fleece the working man. Perhaps in another, less polemical thread i will comment on your points, but not here. I'm done.

 

Its impossible for mannerisms, experience and skills of candidates to be identical. Completely IMPOSSIBLE. Have you even interviewed anyone before? An interview is a very subjective process. The same person can be interviewed by 3 different people and all 3 will read it differently. The same person if interviewed by the same person and asked the same question would not answer them the same. I'm not disagreeing that minorities get hired less. That's just facts, percentages and numbers. But for people to conclude its because they were black...that's the erroneous part. In some cases, I wouldn't doubt it. I also know for a fact that people get jobs BECAUSE they're black or female and their qualifications are "close enough". I've spoken with enough HR staff to be horrified.

 

I thought that Democratic party is a party of racists. All I hear from them is how people should be divided by race and receive race based benefits. Also historically Democrats were slave owners.

 

Re read what he said. He never denied they were Democrats, he was just pointing out they were Conservative Democrats. Back then the Democrats used to always win the south. Tell me when in this countries history has the South ever been a bastion of liberalism? The south has always been conservative. 100 years ago, 50 years ago, 10 years ago, and today, the south remains the most conservative part of this country. It doesn't matter what party they support. It just happens to be that today, they support the party of Lincoln. All entirely due to a successful southern strategy.

 

Right, but liberals even worse, they support government benefits based on race.

 

intresesting i thought everyone knew the tea party was racists its just that some like too deny it because it makes them less popular. Even the KKK denies being a racist organization nowadays, so im not surprised to see the tea party doing the same. But i didnt know that everyone doesn't automatically agree its a racist group

 

They do? like what?

 

The tea party was not always the racist cesspool it is now. When they first started, they had a lot of intelligent moderates from both sides of the political spectrum. They pushed for tax cuts, couples with sensible spending cuts that would allow the budget to be balanced, including cuts to military, corporate subsidies, and other things considered sacred to the far righters who control the party now.

But within months of forming, fringe republicans and independents saw the opportunity to exploit people's dislike of taxes to get easy votes. They formed small tea party groups, separate from the original one that actually knew what they were talking about. They started screaming the word socialism and hitler over and got stupid people on board. Soon, the idiots vastly outnumbered the smart people and the tea party became what we know it as today. A group of old people who are too stupid to understand that the Medicare they want to government to stay out of is a government program, racists who hate Obama because he is black and would have praised a white Republican for doing everything they call Obama a tyrant for doing.(*)

 

As a reverend I should be highly interested about the goings on in an admittedly extremely conservative group like the tea party. I'm not, because I think they have destroyed their credibility with help from the leftist media. I am more concerned about other things that threaten our way of life and our after life.

reva

 

There's very few things I can find to agree with the Tea Party on, but calling them racists just shuts down political discourse. We should steer away from it. Facing them and their platform head on will do a better job of decreasing their power/influence than hurling insults will.