Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Space_Time, Nov 16, 2019.
Lawyers need to eat, too.
Probably not since some chicks like killers...
if we want total adherence to the law, it's best to hang the mutha's on the spot... let the gen-pop know there's no escapin justice... a few casualties will justify the means... fear is the ultimate deterrent...
The victim was supposedly a slut, who had been having consensual sex with the black guy over time. When her white boyfriend found out about he killed her.It is said that the white boyfriend is no saint and based on human nature he is the far more likely perp.
This is Texas, where the black guy is alway guilty. So it would have been easy for the thug cop to have killed his girlfriend right after she had sex with her black lover. After all, the dan evidence would link the black guy to the killing and the cop lovers would cover for the thug cop eve if they had seen the cop kill the woman right before their very own eyes.
So, the lesson is that black guys should not screw white cops girlfriends in Texas or they will get bused for murder when the white cops kill the women. In the meantime just stay home and hope that a crazy white woman cop doesn't barge in and shoot you dead while you are relaxing watching tv and eating ice cream. Remember, you have no equal justice in Texas so don't expect any.
Just remember that everything is against the law someplace so when you break it you will also get hung. Under your plan the entire world population of over 7 billion people will be swinging in less than a week.
not so in the usa, read the rules for capitol punishment...
Maybe the racists who run the criminal justice system should stop being so racist when it comes to jury selection? Having a jury composed of lynch mob members isn't exactly having an impartial jury and a fair trial.
The comment was = "if we want total adherence to the law, it's best to hang the mutha's on the spot... let the gen-pop know there's no escapin justice... a few casualties will justify the means... fear is the ultimate deterrent..."
Therefore, it was an open statement and did not specify crimes. It could mean anything from not cutting your grass to blowing up all of NYC. BTW, not all States have the death penalty. And even in States that do, some counties impose it more than other counties for the same crimes. There are no uniform standards.
the topic was for capital punishment, or did you miss the memo that was the thread title!
The jury system is what it is as we saw with the OJ trial. Jurors are often dumb ass type people. However, Reed was sentenced well over twenty years ago, so there must have been several appeals that reviewed the evidence, i.e., or the execution would have taken place years ago.
Reed was a suspect in the attacks on six other women and his DNA (semen) was found on the murdered woman. To claim the murder victim is a slut who "dated" Reed is beyond contempt. According to the liberal New York times the claim that the boy friend murdered the victim comes from a alleged confession provided to the police by an Aryan Brotherhood (AB) inmate. Hardly credible and if such a "confession" took place the purpose of the confession to the AB inmate may have been to score points with the AB. Where was this witness and any other witnesses for the past 20 years???
I notice that Reed is proclaimed innocent by liberals, rather than expressing a concern that he may be innocent. This is par for the course. Liberals are all about women's rights unless a white woman is raped/murdered by a black man. Then, there seems to be a knee jerk reaction that the black man is innocent as we see in this Reed case.
As a final comment calling (by inference) a murder and rape victim a "slut" is totally beyond contempt.
Dude's STILL WET saliva (DNA proven) was found on the corpse. So what is the story? He slobbers all over her during sex, she preserves the saliva on her chest for a day and then runs over to her fiance to have him murder her?
The saliva demolishes Reed's alibi of having consensual sex with her the day before... it absolutely demolishes it. This is why the lying MSM WILL not talk about it. I had to go to findlaw to find this information. It is not accessible via google search. You should also be aware that in his initial interview, he denied ever meeting or knowing her. Only AFTER being confronted with DNA evidence did he change his story. This was the same story he used in a different brutal rape which he got away with. I encourage you to read the attached link which contains all the evidence that the MSM will not allow the public to see. Absolutely reprehensible partisan reporting pretending to be journalism. It really is a fake news world.
After reading the actual facts, please don't pretend that that there is ANY question about this case, it is an insult to our intelligence. If you want to argue that white lives don't matter it would certainly be more honest.
There are no consistent standards for imposing the death penalty even in the States that have it. Some counties impose it far more than other counties.
This thread takes liberalism (as discussed here) to an ALL TIME LOW, asserting that a women who was raped and murdered is a slut.
imposing is not the same as whether or not it fits the bill guidelines for it...
twist elsewhere, it doesn't work here
DNA analysts have been found guilty of faking DNA results for years, all over the country. Lying is part of their job, especially when it can convict a black guy and cover for a killer cop. Execute everyone involved in the case.
We don't know how he was marked. Maybe he was marked by loss of an appendage. In which case his appeal to women might have been limited at best.
Why are you dismissing this? ==
"After Stites was murdered, Fennell – who denies having anything to do with her death – ended up in prison for the on-duty rape of another woman. That behavior makes Reed’s supporters believe that Fennell was capable of the crime; they also argue that he had a motive to kill Stites if what Reed says was true: That he was having a secret romance with Stites behind Fennell’s back. They’ve presented new affidavits from people who say they knew of this romance, and they’ve presented new affidavits from people who say Fennell made disturbing comments about Stites, in one case, allegedly outright confessing."
Any guy who picks up a cruising chick could be framed for rape and murder by a jealous boyfriend who kills her after she had consensual sex with the guy because the DNA evidence will implicate him and cover for the killer boyfriend. Have you or anyone you know ever been in that risky situation? Millions of guy put themselves in that danger every day. Usually nothing bad happens but it could and they would probably get convicted even though they are innocent.
LMAO, he murders and the justice system in barbaric, wow ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯
21st century or 16th century.
The victims are still just as dead.
Want a second opinion on that?
Are you saying that both examples walk hand in hand? I might tend to agree with you on the point!
If you are a guy are you syaying that you have never hooked up with a woman who had an on-going relationship with another guy? Have you ever seem the tv show Cheaters? https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=cheaters+tv+show&qpvt=cheaters+tv+show&FORM=VDRE Men. and women, get highly ticked off when their partners cheat on them and fly
into angry rages in front of lots of witnesses. Imagine how easy it would be for someone to kill the cheating person and frame the other person.
justices that grant 'stays' should have to 'stand in' for the condemned... someone's gotta fill the slot, we paid for it
I was interdicting with some comedy of the absurd.
Oh! Geez, my bad! I found it relevant, but I often get/see things different then others..
Separate names with a comma.