The 9/11 Commission Scam Exposed in all its Glory

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Feb 11, 2017.

  1. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are 3 major components to the OCT (Official Conspiracy Theory), the Bush administration (and other major official) claims, the 9/11 Commission Report and the NIST reports (and to a lesser extent, the puppet MSM parroting of everything official without raising any significant question). The former were the highest US government authority and the latter two were the very reluctant creation of the US government. This thread exposes the 9/11 Commission and the 9/11 Commission Report. For reference, the technical and other details of the NIST scam can be found here:

    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/458597-nist-9-11-scam-exposed-all-its-glory.html

    A bit of history to begin the thread. It is noteworthy and a fact that the Bush administration did what it could to prevent any investigation of 9/11 and wanted no part of one at all (see at 3:30 and 7:55). But when backed against the wall, wanted to limit it to "intelligence failures". This briefing took place 8 months after 9/11.

    [video=youtube;ePOIhhd9Jr0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePOIhhd9Jr0[/video]

    It is also noteworthy that Tom Daschle's staff were the victims of an anthrax attack presumably targeted at Tom Daschle himself.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/13/AR2006101301417.html
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  2. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    A promising start.

    Maybe now they will quote the text of the report and show us where the alleged lies are.
     
  3. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,084
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    waiting ...
     
  4. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The 9/11 Commission might have never existed if not for the efforts of the 9/11 Family Steering Committee (a group of about 12 9/11 families) and the Jersey Girls.

    http://911independentcommission.org/

    There is also a documentary about the Jersey Girls called 9/11: Press for Truth. Sorry this is the only YouTube version I found:

    [video=youtube;V62-ydk1248]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V62-ydk1248[/video]

    It was obvious very early on that the Bush administration wanted to peddle their version of the 9/11 events and their version only and wanted to coverup as much as they could. A tremendous amount of physical evidence was carted away and destroyed as quickly as possible following 9/11.
     
  5. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Still waiting….
     
  6. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,595
    Likes Received:
    971
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wait, wasn't Trump a truther at one point? What halpened ? He in on it now too?

    Maybe they bought him off.
     
  7. AGWisFAKEsillyBABYKILLERS

    AGWisFAKEsillyBABYKILLERS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2017
    Messages:
    1,296
    Likes Received:
    851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [video=youtube;Rt-ldMj9y9w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w&t=10s[/video]
     
  8. ararmer1919

    ararmer1919 Banned

    Joined:
    May 26, 2014
    Messages:
    8,612
    Likes Received:
    2,147
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because we haven't already seen a hundred threads just like this making the exact same claim and yet...
     
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This thread is about the 9/11 Commission and the 9/11 Commission Report, please remain on topic.
     
  10. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    The Commission Report is accurate. Otherwise someone could quote the text of the report and show where the authors were lying. Since they cannot…we can assume the report is accurate.
     
  11. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Unfortunately there's nothing accurate about the above statement.

    1. The Commission Report is accurate: The published evidence (the 9/11 Commission Report itself) and the Commission themselves contradict this statement.
    2. Someone could quote the text of the report and show where the authors were lying: No one needs to quote specific text to show where the authors are lying, they've already publicly admitted they were lied to but published the lies anyway.
    3. Since they cannot…we can assume the report is accurate: This is false on two levels. First "we" is fallaciously used to indicate that all of us agree it's accurate (using the poster's sole criteria) when only the poster is making a claim. Second, "we" cannot assume anything just because YOU assume, YOU speak for no one but yourself.

    The evidence that this report is far from accurate comes from the history and the authors themselves. However YOU can ASSume it's accurate as you obviously do, the rest of US decide for OURselves.

    I haven't had a whole bunch of time to devote to this project for personal reasons but I will get to it piece by piece in due time.
     
  12. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The 9/11 Commission was plagued with severe problems/scandals from its inception.

    First, Henry Kissinger was named Chairman of the 9/11 Commission only to resign about 3 weeks later because of conflicts of interest.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/12/13/kissinger.resigns/

    Then, Senator Max Cleland, an original 9/11 Commission member resigned. A couple of noteworthy quotes:

    “This is a scam, it’s disgusting. America is being cheated.”

    “As each day goes by, we learn that this government knew a whole lot more about these terrorists before September 11 than it has ever admitted…. Let’s chase this rabbit into the ground. They had a plan to go to war and when 9/11 happened that’s what they did; they went to war.”


    There were massive conflicts of interests as Philip Zelikow, a Bush administration crony, was named Executive Director. It is noteworthy that Zelikow wrote the outline of the 9/11 Commission Report before the Commission got started and had strong control over the Commission's direction and full editorial control over the report itself.

    The 9/11 Commission did NOT conduct a legitimate investigation of 9/11 by their own words and actions/non-actions. For example, the preface of the 9/11 Commission Report states:

    "Our aim has not been to assign individual blame." (page xvi - PDF page 13)

    http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf

    In other words, the Commission admitted it wasn't a criminal investigation of any kind despite that 9/11 was one of the worst crimes ever committed on American soil.

    (more to come)
     
  13. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The primary reason for Senator Max Cleland's resignation was the fact that the Bush administration deliberately stalled the "investigation" and its failure to cooperate with the 9/11 Commission. Cleland claimed "If this decision stands, I, as a member of the commission, cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised." The decision he was referring to was the White House decision to set conditions for the examination of documents. Indeed those conditions included the gross over-classification of documents:

    "There is approximately 570 cubic feet of textual records. A large percentage of the Commission's records are national security classified files."

    https://www.archives.gov/research/9-11

    "The Commission's mandate was to provide a "full and complete accounting" of the attacks of September 11, 2001" (see above link)

    However, the Commission did no such thing. There was no forensic examination of the evidence or any criminal investigation of any kind (by the Commission's own claims), therefore a "complete accounting" was impossible. The NIST investigation/investigators were NOT contributors to the 9/11 Commission Report. The Commission Report claims they interviewed over 1,200 individuals in 10 countries, however we know from key eyewitnesses that their accounts are absent from the 9/11 Commission Report. Some of these key eyewitnesses are Norman Mineta, Sibel Edmonds, William Rodriguez and most notably George Bush and Richard Cheney (the latter two by their own request).

    With regard to the Bush/Cheney interviews, the 9/11 Family Steering Committee submitted 400+ questions they wanted the Commission to ask these two individuals. The following is a compilation of those questions and the rated answers (or absence of answers). The following document was compiled by Mindy Kleinberg and Lorie Van Auken, two of the four Jersey Girls.

    http://www.911truth.org/images/resources/Family_Steering_Cmte-review_of_Report.pdf
     
  14. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Besides the Kleinberg/Van Auken document, there are many videos, books and articles denouncing and contradicting the 9/11 Commission and the 9/11 Commission Report. Some of these are listed here:

    9/11 Family Member Patty Casazza: Government Knew Exact Date and Exact Targets

    9/11 family member and "Jersey Girl" Patty Casazza has just revealed that whistleblowers told her that -- before 9/11 -- the government knew the exact day, the type of attack, and the targets.

    Casazza further stated that these whistleblowers saw how Sibel Edmonds was being harrassed and gagged, and were fearful that the same thing would happen to them. So they approached the Jersey Girls to ask them to demand the 9/11 Commission subpoena the whistleblowers. The Jersey Girls tried to bring the whistleblowers before the 9/11 Commission, and the Commissioners agreed, but then never let the whistleblowers testify, let alone subpoena them.

    [video=youtube;rukxI_GLc3w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rukxI_GLc3w[/video]

    "we got lies ..." - 7:40

    "we know it didn't go as according to what the 9/11 Commission put down on paper" - 11:50

    "we knew it was a farce, we wanted their words, their lies down on paper" - 12:05

    http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/11/911-family-member-patty-casazza.html

    The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie
    by Dr. David Ray Griffin

    http://www.911truth.org/the-911-commission-report-a-571-page-lie/

    [video=youtube;1sv95RD6zGs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sv95RD6zGs[/video]

    The 9/11 Commission Didn’t Believe the Government … So Why Should We?

    9/11 Commissioners Admit They Never Got the Full Story

    The 9/11 Commissioners publicly expressed anger at cover ups and obstructions of justice by the government into a real 9/11 investigation:

    9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue

    The 9/11 Commission chair said the Commission was “set up to fail”

    The Commission’s co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”

    9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”

    9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”

    9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”. When asked in 2009 if he thought there should be another 9/11 commission, Cleland responded: “There should be about fifteen 9/11 commissions”

    The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – said “At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”

    No wonder the Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 – Bob Graham – and 9/11 Commissioner and former Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a “PERMANENT 9/11 commission” or a new 9/11 investigation to get to the bottom of it.


    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/03/911-commissioners-didnt-believe-government.html

    (more to come, as promised)

    (so quiet in this thread you could hear a pin drop - after some of the noise was removed)
     
  15. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry, I didn't make the edit window.

    The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie
    by Dr. David Ray Griffin

    I will close by pointing out that I concluded my study of what I came to call “the Kean-Zelikow Report” by writing that it, “far from lessening my suspicions about official complicity, has served to confirm them. Why would the minds in charge of this final report engage in such deception if they were not trying to cover up very high crimes?”

    http://www.911truth.org/the-911-commission-report-a-571-page-lie/

    The title of the official publication says 9/11 Commission Report but that's a lie from the second word, and obviously, Dr. Griffin agrees. I differ with Griffin because it's really the Zelikow Report, the rest were used as pawns for the coverup. Only one had the stones to blast it and resign. The next word is a lie too.

    (not finished yet, probably never will be)
     
  16. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Its pointless asking you to quote the report so I stopped doing it.
     
  17. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you, along with the irrelevant insults I presume? Whether you "ask" or not, some quotes have already been posted, beginning with the title of the report. As already explained, I will post issues about the 9/11 Commission and the 9/11 Commission Report (and quotes) as I see fit, period.

    Continuing with the 9/11 Commission and the 9/11 Commission Report expose.

    It is quite significant that about 25% of the footnotes supporting the 9/11 Commission Report were indirectly taken from 3rd party accounts from detainees who were renditioned to black sites and mercilessly tortured. Some key testimony was taken from a torture victim who signed a "confession" he wasn't allowed to read. The Senate Intelligence Committee report on Torture claims torture yielded NO useful intelligence. And the CIA destroyed all the torture tapes in violation of a court order to preserve them. So there is not one account in the 9/11 Commission Report taken from torture "testimony" that's has any value whatsoever.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/10/world/senate-intelligence-committee-cia-torture-report.html?_r=0
    http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-fg-torture-report-20141210-story.html
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/dec/09/senate-committee-cia-torture-does-not-work

    Detainee Interrogation Reports
    Chapters 5 and 7 rely heavily on information obtained from captured al Qaeda members. A number of these "detainees" have firsthand knowledge of the 9/11 plot.
    Assessing the truth of statements by these witnesses-sworn enemies of the United States-is challenging. Our access to them has been limited to the review of intelligence reports based on communations received from the locations where the actual intelligence take place. We submitted questions for use in the interrogations but had no control over whether, when, or how questions of particular interest would be asked. Nor were we allowed to talk to the interrogators so that we could better judge the credibility of the detainees and clarify ambiguities in the reporting.


    9/11 Commission Report - page 146 (PDF page 163)

    What the 9/11 Commission DISCLAIMER is saying (in conjunction with the Senate Intelligence Committee's report on torture claim that torture yielded NO useful intelligence) is that Chapters 5 and 7 in their report (that mostly deal with Al Qaeda) is so unreliable as to be absolutely worthless. Yet the statement includes the following sentence:

    We have nonetheless decided to include information from captured 9/11 conspirators and al Qaeda members in our report.

    http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf

    Note that what the 9/11 Commission DISCLAIMER is also saying is that they deliberately included at least 2 chapters of worthless information in their report. There is also no proof of any kind that some or any of these detainees were actually Al Qaeda members or had anything to do with Al Qaeda or 9/11. In fact as I recall, at least one of these detainees whose 3rd party account was obtained via torture was eventually released because he had no ties to Al Qaeda. The last sentence is to the best of my recollection, I will try to find the documents where I read this at another time.
     
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There's more to come but at this juncture, my sincerest thanks to all rabid OCT defenders to have prodded me to do what I should have been doing. You asked for it and I'm giving it. You certainly deserve it.

    I understand the information I posted is overwhelming but it's a very worthwhile read IMO, no matter what your beliefs are. Almost all the evidence referenced are US government sources, especially its official publications.
     
  19. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    4,973
    Likes Received:
    1,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks for that orderly analysis Bob, it's there for anybody to see, as long as one is curious and honest.

    The Kean-Zelikow Commission (I love that name) is just like the Warren Commission--the bureaucracy's way of protecting the guilty and covering asses at all levels.

    It's all there for anyone to see--the government is making stuff up, telling a story that is contradicted by physics.
     
  20. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The official publications authored by the 9/11 Commission and NIST, both masquerading as investigations, have been demonstrably proven to be designed as coverups. A coverup almost always serves only one purpose, to protect the real criminals. For elements within the US government to be involved in these tactics is treasonous conspiracy.

    The Preface of the 9/11 Commission Report says:

    We thank officials, past and present, who were generous with their time and provided us with insight. The PENTTBOM team at the FBI .... etc. - page xvii (PDF page 14)

    However we were recently informed that the FBI withheld over 80,000 pages of documents from their PENTTBOM investigation from the 9/11 Commission and Congress and lied when they claimed they gave them everything.

    https://www.intellihub.com/fbi-80000-documents-saudi-911-ties/

    The FBI never published any official report from their PENTTBOM "investigation" (another entity involved in the 9/11 coverup) because they classified as much as they could, even from the 9/11 Commission and Congress.
     

Share This Page