The 9/11 Commission Scam Exposed in all its Glory

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Feb 11, 2017.

  1. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://www.intellihub.com/fbi-80000-documents-saudi-911-ties/

    Let's face it IF 9/11 was an inside job, the odds are pretty good Bush knew about it. Although there is no incontrovertible evidence confirming that it was an inside job, there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence suggesting it was.
     
  2. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There was nothing relevant in any of those 80,000+ pages was there?

    Do you think that it was most likely an inside job?
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2019
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They are classified to this day, no one knows what's in them.

    For me the stand down alone is complicity to terrorism and mass murder. Everything points to an inside job, it's difficult to believe it was just a stand down.
     
  4. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    89,511
    Likes Received:
    21,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Some folks have nothing better to do than immerse themselves in silly conspiracy theories. I suppose it is their entertainment, like spitting into the wind.
     
  5. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No questions surrounding 9/11 then? Official story is completely above scrutiny? The government should be 100% believed?
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2019
    Bob0627 likes this.
  6. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And some folks have nothing better to do than to post irrelevant off topic drivel because they're desperately trying to sidetrack the actual discussion. If you don't want to participate in the subject matter being discussed stay the **** out of the thread.
     
  7. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    89,511
    Likes Received:
    21,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nothing like a little entertainment.
     
  8. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Once again, if you refuse to discuss the topic of this thread and related issues, you are trolling and violating the rules of this forum.
     
  9. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No questions surrounding 9/11 then? Official story is completely above scrutiny? The government should be 100% believed?
     
  10. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    89,511
    Likes Received:
    21,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And MIT analysis, not some conspiracy theorist.
     
  11. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The official narrative IS a conspiracy theory peddled via the 9/11 Commission Report. The FACTS (see below) show the 9/11 Commission and their report is severely bankrupt on many different levels. So what MIT analysis are you talking about? There is no "MIT analysis" with respect to the 9/11 Commission and their report that I'm aware of, which are the subject of this thread.

     
  12. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What MIT analysis?
     
  13. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sure, but only foreknowledge about an attack by an outside actor.
     
  14. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There’s no way to know who knew what. Certainly IF 9/11 was an inside job some people knew the real deal and warned others of an imminent attack by an outside party.
     
  15. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why would they do that?
     
  16. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    To protect their loved ones obviously. Some people did not board the 9/11 planes or go to the World Trade Center when they should have. Larry Silverstein for example.
     
    chris155au likes this.
  17. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So when you say that you think that Bush knew about the attacks, what are you basing that on?
     
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Articles I've read and research conducted by the Jersey Girls, supported by Bush's behavior on and following 9/11, not to mention the 12 war games deliberately scheduled for the morning of 9/11.
     
  19. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Do the Jersey girls claim that he knew about an inside job?
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2019
  20. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
  21. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  22. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    1. It doesn't matter if he knew it was an inside or not or what I personally think, he stood down, that's documented history and that says all there is to know.

    2. IF it was or wasn't an inside job in the sense that elements of the US government orchestrated 9/11, the overwhelming circumstantial evidence strongly suggests an orchestrated inside job. In the sense that complicity is equal to an inside job, a stand down is complicity, foreknowledge without taking any action is complicity, incompetence is complicity, dereliction of duty is complicity, the end result is no different than an inside job. The number of convenient coincidences and 9/11 "miracles" that made 9/11 a near perfect success is staggering. It boggles the mind how anyone with any reasonable intelligence who had studied these convenient "miracles" cannot conclude that it was most likely an inside job or at the very least that it requires a legitimate investigation.

    3. Only a legitimate investigation that never took place can try to determine the exact nature of an inside job or absolve it. That such an investigation never took place and there was a concerted effort by the Bush administration to obstruct/prevent any investigation into 9/11 is complicity. And that happened in multiple ways.

    4. If Bush himself didn't act properly, he's either incompetent or derelict of duty (or both) and therefore fully complicit.

    The bottom line is 9/11 absolutely requires a legitimate scientific AND criminal investigation.
     
    chris155au likes this.
  23. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What do you mean Bush "stood down?"

    These are all things which can be reasonably used to say that the government was responsible for 9/11, but to use them to say that it was an inside job is ridiculous. "Inside job" implies intent. Just because someone was incompetent on that day or in the investigation does not mean that they had intent to contribute to the attacks.

    Was the Bush administration questioned at the time as to why they were obstructing/preventing any investigation?
     
  24. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    17,298
    Likes Received:
    1,433
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Just as an example, one of the debunking arguments is that the steel wouldn't have been required to melt in order for the buildings to collapse - it just needed to be weakened enough to the point of failure.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2019
  25. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,346
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Doing nothing is a stand down, especially when being warned in advance multiple times.

    You can describe it any way you want but for me failing responsibility is complicity and the same as an inside job.

    Scheduling 12 war games on the morning of 9/11 that effectively took away the air defense system for the entire northeast corridor of the US was deliberate and intentional, not incompetence. Doing nothing was deliberate and intentional, not incompetence. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence indicating that the 3 WTC towers were destroyed via controlled demolition and not one legitimate scientific study that supports the phony theory that they were globally destroyed at free fall and near free fall due to planes, damage, fire or a combination. One would have to be incredibly gullible to believe this was all incompetence or a coincidence.

    The 9/11 Commission "questioned" Bush and Cheney together, unrecorded, unsworn and notes were not allowed. What kind of scam would you call that?

    That has nothing to do with science, it's just plain denial of the FACTS. There were multiple documented corroborating eyewitness claims of seeing pools of molten steel or metal on 9/11, supported by the fact that firefighters were unable to put out underground fires due to intense heat for 3 months. One FEMA investigator claims he saw the melting of girders on 9/11, which are of course made of steel. It doesn't matter any "debunking arguments", what matters are the facts, the facts don't change because some claim melting steel wasn't required.
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2019
    chris155au likes this.

Share This Page