The 9/11 Commission Scam Exposed in all its Glory

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Feb 11, 2017.

  1. GrumpyCatFace

    GrumpyCatFace Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2017
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    The responsible thing to do is exactly that, until you have evidence to the contrary.

    I'm aware that there was some funny **** going on around the attack, but I can't prove a single bit of conspiracy. It smells like it, but there's not much to go on.
     
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's not up to you or I to prove anything, it's your prerogative to investigate for yourself if you're interested.

    I can't speak for you but for me the evidence is overwhelming, a tremendous amount of information has been posted in this section of the forum. It's all there for you to examine if you want to. There is only one reason for a coverup, to protect the criminals. A coverup that includes deliberate destruction of evidence, especially when we're talking about 9/11, is criminal complicity and the fact that it was done by more than one person equals a criminal conspiracy. That is all within the scope of the definition of the US government's own laws. It's still not legal because the US government (i.e. the Bush administration and their minions) did it.
     
  3. GrumpyCatFace

    GrumpyCatFace Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2017
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    To protect 'Criminals', but not necessarily 'The Criminals' that hit the buildings. Again, it could be unrelated, other than a shady arms/oil deal or something that would have been exposed.
     
  4. GrumpyCatFace

    GrumpyCatFace Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2017
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    To protect 'Criminals', but not necessarily 'The Criminals' that hit the buildings. Again, it could be unrelated, other than a shady arms/oil deal or something that would have been exposed.
     
  5. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's true, but when one is protecting the criminals, whoever they may be:

    1. It is criminal complicity.
    2. It is a criminal conspiracy since it was done by more than 1 person.
    3. While it could be unrelated and not necessarily the criminals that hit the building (or planned it), the criminals could very well be those who planned 9/11. And given all the other facts/events of 9/11 and the US government's behavior surrounding 9/11, the likelihood that it is the actual 9/11 criminals that are being protected is much greater than not.

    No matter what, it is NOT excusable and the above is a massive crime in itself perpetrated by the Bush administration and the very definition of treason as described by Article III Section 3 of the US Constitution. I'm not sure why you seem to be trying to be somewhat of an apologist for these massive crimes, perhaps you fear the possibility. There is NO excuse for failing to legitimately investigate 9/11.
     
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,108
    Likes Received:
    2,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was legitiately investigated your attacks are an illegitimate failure.

    You have never cited a shred of evidence and the only support for your claim is you hate government.

    Cite one specific passage from the report which you claim is false and show evidence it is a lie.

    Come on and do it and stop running away
     
  7. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks Dr NO, I know your position full well, and I'm sure everyone who reads these threads regularly also know. Your position however is not relevant to the facts about 9/11, the 9/11 Commission or the 9/11 Commission Report nor can you change those facts. The same is true for me and everyone else.
     
    jack4freedom likes this.
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,108
    Likes Received:
    2,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The facts do not support your assertions and you evade any request to address facts.

    Your position and theories are proven false unless you can cite one specific passage from the report which you claim is a lie and show evidence of this claim
     
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry Dr. NO your fanatical denials of the facts still do nothing to erase or change them. My "assertions", whatever you believe they are, are also irrelevant to the facts, the facts are what they are, regardless of you or me. Get over it, you convince no one who's not already convinced.

    The 9/11 Commissioners don't believe they got it right because they were lied to and compromised or even that got all of it. This comes from their own books and public statements as well as the report itself, you can't change that no matter how much you want to deny it. And that's only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the 9/11 Commission "investigation" and their report. That's not a legitimate investigation no matter how much you want to claim it's "accurate".
     
  10. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,108
    Likes Received:
    2,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong.

    The 911 commissioners never said any such thing and you are claiming bald faced lies about them.

    you never provide direct quoted or any evidence of any kind WHATSOEVER.

    You never state facts at all.

    What you state is RHETORIC and nothing more. You hate the government you think everything and everything the government says is a lie. Which means if any 911 commission member claimed it was a lie ( AND NONE HAVE EVER MADE ANY SUCH CLAIM ) they would be lying and the report is true.

    You provide a specific passage from the report which you claim is a lie along with credible hard evidence that it is a lie. Until you do you are the ONLY one stating bald faced lies and the investigation stands as legitimate.

    Nothing you have ever posted challenges it's legitimacy.

    Your only position is you hate government and that is evidence only of naivety and foolishness.
     
  11. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I reduced YOUR post to its basic element. You are truly boring Dr NO. To remind YOU this thread is about the 9/11 Commission and the 9/11 Commission Report not me. Please remain on topic, thanks.
     
  12. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,615
    Likes Received:
    2,330
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You cannot prove a single bit of conspiracy, and the government, whether NIST, the pentagon or the commission cannot prove a single element of the official story. I guess that makes you both even, eh?

    As for me, considering that the government cannot prove a single element of its story, and that most men in the government are notorious liars at best, the official story therefore cannot be believed.
     
    jack4freedom likes this.
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,108
    Likes Received:
    2,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You left out the part where you have never presented evidence for your claims.

    you never read the report.

    You cannot quote one inaccuracy within it.

    You're entire argument is you hate the government
     
  14. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,615
    Likes Received:
    2,330
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I can't speak for Bob, but he comes across as not hating the government, but rather he is just extremely skeptical of government claims, no matter the subject matter.
     
  15. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is no US government to "hate". What masquerades as the US government is actually a criminal, murdering and racketeering oligarchy (or corporatocracy), a "government" by billionaires for billionaires that pretends to govern. The Constitution guarantees a Constitutional Republic, a "Republican form of government" (Article IV Section 4) but there is no such thing in America and there hasn't been since 1803 (Marbury v Madison), when the 3rd branch, the Judiciary corrupted the Constitution forever in a stealthy coup d'etat. The behavior of this criminal cartel is the same as that of typical criminals (murder, steal, lie, cheat, etc.). The 9/11 Commission and the 9/11 Commission Report are just an example of this. The founders were well aware that governments always migrate toward tyranny because that has always been the history of all governments. This is why Thomas Jefferson wrote in our founding document "... when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government" (see my signature). Thomas Jefferson also wrote:

    [​IMG]
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  16. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So back to the topic at hand.



    In the above video, Wolf Blitzer explains the DEAL between the White House and the 9/11 Commission, which Senator Max Cleland further describes and characterizes the DEAL as a SCAM and OBSTRUCTION. The DEAL is that some members of the Commission will have access to some of the documents/evidence (presumably a small percentage of the 570 cubic feet that was classified) and that would be passed on to the remaining members at the White House's discretion. So the White House OBSTRUCTED the 9/11 "investigation" and the Commission members agreed to such a DEAL. Who can blame Cleland for calling it a SCAM, DISGUSTING and resigning as a result?
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2017
    Eleuthera and jack4freedom like this.
  17. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113


    "Everybody on the 9/11 Commission was covering for someone" - U.S. Army Lt. Col Anthony Shaffer

    "It was a whitewash and a lie from top to bottom" - Former CIA Intelligence Officer Michael F. Scheuer
     
    Eleuthera and jack4freedom like this.
  18. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    :roflol:
     
  19. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Still no quote of any major inaccuracies in the report.
     
  20. Cornergas

    Cornergas Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male

    The entire report of the 9/11 "commission" is garbage..you would know that if you read it and have half a brain....but you don't obviously.
    Show us one accurate thing in the rerport.....tic toc tic toc still waiting....
     
  21. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah that's about all you have fake one, a child's emoji to match your level of maturity.

    For you myopic one there never will be, the 9/11 Commission Report is "accurate". If it really is though, then there's no need for you to state that every single day. You must be terrified that maybe it really isn't, otherwise you wouldn't be here trying to convince posters 24/7 it is, or you're just plain trolling. Regardless, a guy (gal?) who calls him/herself "usda_select" has no relevance, stick to trolling and childish emojis, intellectual discussion is well beyond your capability. Then again, you're not here to discuss 9/11 same as the other troll I have on ignore, that is obvious, you fool no one.
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2017
  22. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,108
    Likes Received:
    2,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Asking specific questions IS part of a discussion.

    Crying about having been asked those questions is not discussing it.

    Neither is it questioning the government
     
  23. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,615
    Likes Received:
    2,330
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Asking stupid questions, for example questions that have already been asked and answered OR irrelevant questions, is a sign of stirring the pot, if you know what I mean.
     
  24. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What's posted is documentation that people in a position to know, some in key positions within the 9/11 Commission itself, are saying it's a lie from start to finish, a scam, a coverup, unfinished, underfunded, set up to fail and more. The report itself has a disclaimer about its reliability. The NIST report is also filled with disclaimers (I had to add that in). But the trolls insist it's "accurate" and the truth, that no questions are asked and demand the intellectually bankrupt reverse burden of proof (because none of the first sentence has ever been posted they claim) or else it's "accurate". At least I believe that's the strategy. There's never any discussion about the first sentence, it's all twoofer BS, never happened, never proven (despite the videos, documents and books, authored by those intimately involved).
     
  25. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,108
    Likes Received:
    2,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    NO BODY here has insisted it is accurate and true.

    What they are pointing out is you cannot say it is accurate or not accurate or true or false because you know nothing at all about it.

    you refuse to do any research or ask any pertinent questions and most importantly you will not read the report.

    By definition this proves all of your claims are false
     

Share This Page