The 9/11 Commission Scam Exposed in all its Glory

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Feb 11, 2017.

  1. GrumpyCatFace

    GrumpyCatFace Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2017
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Ok... well that is useful information I guess... Now replace the commission report with something of actual use. tic toc tic toc still waiting.
     
  2. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That would be the purpose of a legitimate official forensic, scientific, criminal investigation into 9/11 that uses standard universally accepted investigative protocol that includes transparency and the scientific method (which incorporates peer review) and excludes immunity for key suspects, as opposed to a pretend one that actually serves as a COVERUP.

    Yes we are, 15+ years later and we have still never had any such thing.
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2017
    Eleuthera likes this.
  3. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How would you know since you know nothing at all about the official report and it proves you wrong?
     
  4. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Why don't you man up and just answer the question Bob? ... show us the inaccuracies in the report and not just play the out of context youtube soundbites ... stop with the short skirts ... your confirmation bias is on full display ...
     
  5. Cornergas

    Cornergas Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    e


    The "official" reports proves nothing...it is a document "set up to fail" as the commission was, admitted by it's own members....Show anything that is correct in the report...it is all based on the government's "official" version of events which are not in touch with the evidence and reality
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No you have been asked repeatedly to quote one specific passage which you claim is false and show evidence it is a lie. You have fearfully run away from that and it proves you have never read it and know nothing of it and until you do so your claim is a lie.

    It is perfectly in touch with evidence unlike what you have posted.

    you cannot and will not provide a shred of evidence to challenge it
     
  7. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think you need to grow a pair and quit licking up the US government's diarrhea you're fed daily.

    If you really haven't figured out the scam by now despite the mountain of evidence I've posted in this section of the forum, you know what they say about a pile of bricks. Sorry, I'm not here to try to convince you of anything, you bought it, eat up and bon appetit. Regardless, I really don't believe even you are that utterly lost in space. In fact, you admitted this is your hobby, didn't you?
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2017
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Refusing to address both sides of the issue is not growing a pair an being brave.

    You have never questioned the government or anyone else you only hate hate hate and assume what ever BS you see on you tube is real.
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,633
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    like thats hard to do? they fraudulently substituted modelled collapse data for the actual data and contoured the linear regression to give unskilled posers the idea the collapse was much slower than freefall. No I wont dig it out, the above statement gives you all the information you need, if you are qualified to be here you already know what I am referring to and can take your best shot at on point rebuttal.
     
  10. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It DID collapse slower than free fall and no one manipulated anything except those uneducated trolls you love who lied about free fall speed
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,633
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    No need need to lie, it collapsed at freefall, so stop with the lies already, high school math and understanding is all that is needed to understand what freefall is or how its calculated, you can do that right?
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2017
  12. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is you lying it is long proven it did not collapse at free fall you got destroyed with that claim long ago and are now hoping everyone forgot
     
  13. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The offical report proves a lot and is supported by evidence.

    There is no such admission by the members as you claim.

    I asked you first to quote a specific part which is false and you ran in fear from doing so.
     
  14. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's non-controversial, NIST and just about everyone in a position to know agree. Only anonymous trolls pretend slower or over g or that it's insignificant anyway because 8 stories were a tiny part of the "collapse", pick your troll. It doesn't matter if it wasn't free fall anyway (WTC1 & WTC2 at approx 2/3 free fall) by itself, there was also nearly uniform acceleration and symmetry in all 3 allegedly plane/damage/fire induced "collapses". Just another of the thousands of very convenient coincidences that all happened in one day.
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2017
  15. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,525
    Likes Received:
    2,303
    Trophy Points:
    113

    There are many examples of false statements by the commission, and one is that UA93 crashed in that Pennsylvania field. It did not, and all the witness statements and photographic evidence show that. Ditto 77 at the pentagon.
     
  16. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Besides false statements, there is not one thing in the 9/11 Commission Report that's supported by forensic evidence since no forensic investigation was ever conducted by the 9/11 Commission. And worse, much of the report is supported by disclaimed (as to its reliability) 3rd party torture testimony which would be rejected by any legitimate court and certainly by any legitimate investigation. Beyond that, all attempts at examining evidence and eyewitness claims that were not in line with the pre-conceived official conspiracy story was either blocked or suppressed by the Bush administration and by the 9/11 Commission itself via either Philip Zelikow or other members of the Commission. To say the report is a worthless piece of garbage is to be kind, the 9/11 Commission "investigation" and resulting "report" was a criminal act by all involved.

    18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3): US Code - Section 1001: Statements or entries generally

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any
    matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or
    judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly
    and willfully –

    (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the
    same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent
    statement or entry;

    shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years
    or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as
    defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or
    both.

    http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/47/1001

    The above describes the 9/11 Commission and their report just perfectly.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  17. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is not a direct quote.

    And it is a false hood.

    All the evidence proves UA93 crashed in that field and no witnesses or evidence contradicts that fact. Neither you nor anyone else has ever been able to produce any evidence or witness to the contrary.

    The same is true for the pentagon and flight 77 you were crushed and debunked years ago trying claim it did not hit the Pentago
     
  18. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All lies.

    You cannot quote one false statement and they did in fact conduct such an investigation the evidence proves you wrong
     
  19. Cornergas

    Cornergas Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    lol.....Soupnazi quote anything from the "9/11 commission report" and it is false...even though you are in denial you have to admit that if you are honest? The jury is out on that...
     
  20. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Go ahead and quote a specific passage which is false and show evidence that it is.

    Until you do you are merely posting ignorant fiction
     
  21. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,795
    Likes Received:
    156
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Start watching this video at the 2:19:30 time mark.

    September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)




    Start watching the above video at the 1:55:25 time mark.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  22. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,161
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You won't see any of that video in the 9/11 Commission Report, that's for sure.
     
  23. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanx for proving my point.

    Not one speck of evidence refuting what I said
     
  24. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    2,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because it is fiction and they ignored fiction focusing on facts and evidence instead
     
  25. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Still no quotes from the Commission Report revealing any major inaccuracies.

    I guess that means it’s still 100% correct.
     

Share This Page