Besides false statements, there is not one thing in the 9/11 Commission Report that's supported by forensic evidence since no forensic investigation was ever conducted by the 9/11 Commission. And worse, much of the report is supported by disclaimed (as to its reliability) 3rd party torture testimony which would be rejected by any legitimate court and certainly by any legitimate investigation. Beyond that, all attempts at examining evidence and eyewitness claims that were not in line with the pre-conceived official conspiracy story was either blocked or suppressed by the Bush administration and by the 9/11 Commission itself via either Philip Zelikow or other members of the Commission. To say the report is a worthless piece of garbage is to be kind, the 9/11 Commission "investigation" and resulting "report" was a criminal act by all involved. 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3): US Code - Section 1001: Statements or entries generally (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/47/1001 The above describes the 9/11 Commission and their report just perfectly.