1. PF has switched to Xenforo. Please see this post for more details. Search and other functions are still being worked on.
    Dismiss Notice

The 9/11 Commission Scam Exposed in all its Glory

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Feb 11, 2017.

  1. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,152
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Besides false statements, there is not one thing in the 9/11 Commission Report that's supported by forensic evidence since no forensic investigation was ever conducted by the 9/11 Commission. And worse, much of the report is supported by disclaimed (as to its reliability) 3rd party torture testimony which would be rejected by any legitimate court and certainly by any legitimate investigation. Beyond that, all attempts at examining evidence and eyewitness claims that were not in line with the pre-conceived official conspiracy story was either blocked or suppressed by the Bush administration and by the 9/11 Commission itself via either Philip Zelikow or other members of the Commission. To say the report is a worthless piece of garbage is to be kind, the 9/11 Commission "investigation" and resulting "report" was a criminal act by all involved.

    18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3): US Code - Section 1001: Statements or entries generally

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any
    matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or
    judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly
    and willfully –

    (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the
    same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent
    statement or entry;

    shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years
    or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as
    defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or
    both.

    http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/47/1001

    The above describes the 9/11 Commission and their report just perfectly.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  2. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,600
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    That is not a direct quote.

    And it is a false hood.

    All the evidence proves UA93 crashed in that field and no witnesses or evidence contradicts that fact. Neither you nor anyone else has ever been able to produce any evidence or witness to the contrary.

    The same is true for the pentagon and flight 77 you were crushed and debunked years ago trying claim it did not hit the Pentago
     
  3. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,600
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    All lies.

    You cannot quote one false statement and they did in fact conduct such an investigation the evidence proves you wrong
     
  4. Cornergas

    Cornergas Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    lol.....Soupnazi quote anything from the "9/11 commission report" and it is false...even though you are in denial you have to admit that if you are honest? The jury is out on that...
     
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,600
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Go ahead and quote a specific passage which is false and show evidence that it is.

    Until you do you are merely posting ignorant fiction
     
  6. Scott

    Scott Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,016
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Start watching this video at the 2:19:30 time mark.

    September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)




    Start watching the above video at the 1:55:25 time mark.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  7. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,152
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You won't see any of that video in the 9/11 Commission Report, that's for sure.
     
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,600
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Thanx for proving my point.

    Not one speck of evidence refuting what I said
     
  9. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,600
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Because it is fiction and they ignored fiction focusing on facts and evidence instead
     
  10. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Still no quotes from the Commission Report revealing any major inaccuracies.

    I guess that means it’s still 100% correct.
     
  11. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    1,268
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    48
    That sort of guessing, tortured thinking, is all one has when attempting to defend a bright and shining lie.
     
  12. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,152
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    It's not a "guess", it's 3rd grade logic he believes has merit. It's not "tortured thinking" either, it's tortured logic he believes might fly (I'm not even sure he believes that either). He knows the reality, no one is that utterly lost. The 9/11 Commission Report doesn't stand on its own merit and has no merit, that's even according to the 9/11 Commission (see the many quotes listed in this thread) and the report itself via its disclaimer and other bankrupt, illogical claims. Examples:

    “Our aim has not been to assign individual blame. Our aim has been to provide the fullest possible account of the events surrounding 9/11 and to identify lessons learned.“ - Preface, Page XVI

    This is a blatant oxymoron. How on earth can an investigation "provide the fullest possible account" and fail to research in depth who is to blame?

    "... the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance." 5.4 A MONEY TRAIL?, Page 172

    The idea that determining the funding for any crime, especially 9/11, has "little practical significance" goes against all universally accepted criminal investigation protocol. See this:

    http://www.consensus911.org/point-g-2/

    Then there's this DISCLAIMER section from Page 146 that begins with:

    "Detainee Interrogation Reports
    Chapter 5 and 7 rely heavily on information obtained from captured al Qaeda members. A number of these "detainees" have first hand knowledge of the 9/11 plot."


    There is NO evidence (certainly none provided in the 9/11 Commission Report) that any of these "detainees" were captured al Qaeda members or that any "had first hand knowledge of the 9/11 plot". This is even contradicted by the FACT that at least one of the detainees that allegedly provided a good deal of the information used in the 9/11 Commission Report was later determined to have had nothing to do with Al Qaeda.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/us/abu-zubaydah-torture-guantanamo-bay.html?_r=0

    The DISCLAIMER continues with:

    "Assessing the truth of statements by these witnesses---sworn enemies of the United States---is challenging. Our access to them has been limited to the review of intelligence reports based on communications received from the locations where the actual interrogations take place. We submitted questions for use in the interrogations, but has no control over whether, when, or how questions of particular interest would be asked. Nor were we allowed to talk to the interrogators so that we could better the credibility of the detainees and clarify ambiguities in the reporting."

    In other words, the 9/11 Commission had NO ACCESS and the information they used was 3rd party relayed documents and they had NO CONTROL. The legitimacy of the information used was obviously being questioned.

    Regardless they admitted: "We have nonetheless decided to include information from captured 9/11 conspirators and al Qaeda members in our report."

    So they had no access, no control and no proof, and at least one detainee contradicted the above but despite, they made blanket claims and included unverified/unsupported information in the report.

    http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2017 at 1:10 PM
  13. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    1,268
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    48
    It is a bright and shining lie, still being told today. At least in management levels, the media is so telling the bright and shining lie.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  14. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,152
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Nah, if you close your eyes, there are none.

    If YOU don't see any quotes then it must be to YOU.
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2017 at 2:50 PM
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,600
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You can provide no evidence it is a lie.

    You never even read it and can quote no part which is a lie.

    It is you attempting the defense of a bright shining lie called 911 conspiracy theories
     
  16. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,600
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You finally provided quotes but none that you can prove are inaccuracies.

    You are still falling massively short
     
  17. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,600
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You wish it were but it is supported by evidence and you can offer none to refute it.

    You have never even TRIED to offer evidence
     
  18. Cornergas

    Cornergas Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    All kinds of evidence presented, to conclusively indicate 9/11 was controlled demolition of the WTC buildings 1,2, and 7...but you either cannot read, or refuse to read it, but keep parrotting the same old denials...over and over.....how much is the government paying you to keep in your denial mode?
     
  19. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    10,600
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Wrong you nor anyone has ever offered or presented any evidence of any kind to be read.

    .
     
  20. Cornergas

    Cornergas Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Messages:
    151
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Maybe a shrink could help you deal with reality, and the evidence presented to you, that clearly points to 9/11 events to be staged by members of the USA government, as an inside job...give it a try, your denials are very shallow, and indicative of someone who needs help...lots of help.
     

Share This Page