The actual planning of the Pentagon attack from a truther's POV...

Discussion in '9/11' started by Gamolon, Dec 19, 2018.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "Conflicting evidence" can come in many different flavors, it doesn't have to be hard evidence, it can be a logical argument or it can just be that the point is unsupported or not fully supported. Some of your points are merely unsupported claims of having provided proof, even sometimes described as irrefutable. That is quite audacious on your part. No one in this forum owns any 9/11 proof or evidence of any kind. As participants in 9/11 discussions we can only source what we each believe supports our opinions on the subject. For a poster to conclude that he/she has proven anything about 9/11 is dishonest, especially given the fact that the source of our knowledge comes from what we were fed by the US government and particularly because the US government publicly admits that an incredible amount of documents/evidence is classified. None of us actually knows the extent of the evidence that is missing because of the deliberate wholesale destruction and extreme over-classification, not to mention outright lies and distortions. Half a story is a LIE, plain and simple, it is not truth.

    Yet all your posts and the tone of your posts on the subject of 9/11 so far tell a different story, one that is quite familiar to me and aligns very well with the official narrative and derisively of posters who disagree with the officially narrative and you. For you it seems there are only two labels, "truther" (as applied in derogatory terms) and "debunker". "Skeptic" is just a word you claim for yourself that does not describe your position at all. "Skeptic" would be a more appropriate description of my position since I question the entire official 9/11 narrative from start to finish. It doesn't mean for example that I believe no planes were involved (or even half-planes as you describe it), it just means I question everything and accept nothing from the US government as fact. This is after all an entity that has a long illustrious record of pathologically lying. Governments are made up of self-serving politicians who will say and do anything to attain their positions of power. To trust the US government is as foolish as it gets.
     
  2. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    #1. If you dont have "hard" evidence, then you havent any evidence at all. Tell you what lets make it easy, you tell me what point you disagree with regarding the Pentagon that i stated....and we will go from there.

    #2. Im not the only skeptic however, there are a few others. That doesnt mean i fully entrust the official narrative. There are many things incomplete and flat out incorrect but as much as i state this, this point seems to stand out more than the physical evidence of the day. lets not make this about me. Lets make this about the points which you disagree with.
     
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And that describes the official 9/11 narrative just perfectly.

    I disagree with your claim that anything about the Pentagon with respect to the official narrative has been proven.
     
  4. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    #1. That describes the difference between belief and knowledge.
    #2. Great, then explain what happened at the Pentagon. You disagree that American Airlines Flight 77 impacted the Pentagon, so you must have an explanation for what happened.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2019
  5. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    agreed! That great we agree on something.

    So how about it Adam.... you litigate on behalf of the oct, so when are you going to give me the hard evidence that I have asked you to provide? Remember?

    8 - wheels
    2 - main landing gear
    2 - 6 ton engines

    There is more but thats a good start, you dont want everyone to think you dont have the main course of evidence do you?
    read what he said again, this time for comprehension, instead of posting strawman arguments. He does not need to offer anyone an alternative theory, much less a comprehensive alternative investigation, a strawman you seem to believe is legitimate, its not. He only needs to point out with reason you have not sufficiently proven your case, thats the way it works in debates and in courts as well for that matter. The burden lies on the claimant, the kleptocracy claims a 757 went in, its their burden to prove it and yours if you try to litigate their position.

    Btw so far I havent seen any parts that remotely resemble anything larger than a drone.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2019
    wist43 and Bob0627 like this.
  6. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What does?

    Why in the world would I need to do that? Neither I nor anyone else (other than those who were intimately involved) can explain what exactly happened at the Pentagon.

    As Koko posted and I will be just as direct, there is absolutely no reason for me to be required to have an explanation for what happened at the Pentagon whether I agree or disagree that AA77 impacted the Pentagon. And I never claimed I disagree that AA77 impacted the Pentagon, I simply am completely dissatisfied with the official explanation which is not based on any legitimate investigation. It's a story one can only accept on faith as you have done. The key is that no one has ever proven beyond doubt the official claim that AA77 impacted the Pentagon. Everything about the official story (including the Pentagon massacre) stinks the putrid smell of a coverup. It isn't my job to prove or disprove anything or to concoct some alternate story. It is absolutely the job and the mandated duty of the US government to prove beyond any doubt their claim that AA77 impacted the Pentagon. All the shenanigans conducted by the US government strongly point to their story being a lie. If it wasn't a lie, they would have been able to prove it beyond any doubt. And this is exactly what I meant by transparency. They've done everything in their power to suppress evidence including wholesale denials of FOIA requests for illegitimate or no reason at all.
     
  7. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    The evidence i provided in numerous posts shows American Airlines Flight 77 impacted the pentagon. You can disagree all day long, but unless you can show otherwise it wont change the facts in your favor. All you have done is disagree, well provide evidence that shows otherwise. Its basically as easy as i outlined. I have Koko blocked so i dont know or care what he says. You claim the government conducted shennigans, prove it in this regard.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2019
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here you said you are a hard evidence guy and you dismiss out of hand the FACT that no bonafide evidence exists. I asked for HARD evidence, you gave us nothing.
    Something is very wrong with that picture dont you think?

    Awesome, I can post with impunity!

    Hey Bob, sound familiar? So we have ignoring the tough questions forcing one to repeat then ignoring repeats, what a racket!

    When the going gets to tough the tough get going.....otta town! LOL

    Hey Adam et al, this is what a debris field from a real plane looks like:

    [​IMG]
    Oh look it has BIG wheels, main landing gear and BIG engines.

    not the little tinker toys you and beta posted as 'evidence'
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2019
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You haven't provided any evidence in any post that shows AA77 impacted the Pentagon, no one has. You are just posting unsupported claims repetitively and I don't need to prove a negative or get into reverse burden of proof malarkey, that is as ludicrous as it gets. I can also make claims all day long and insist that I've proven Santa and the Tooth Fairy are real and transpose the burden of proof to you to prove me wrong. This not a valid approach to a discussion. I have no idea why you're even attempting to convince me. Sorry but your repetitive Pentagon claims no longer interest me. I've been through this merry go round with many other OCT defenders/apologists and you haven't come up with anything unique, it's the same old tired routine. You can put me on ignore too if that helps gives you some weird level of comfort that the official narrative is true and all posters who deny it should no longer exist for you. You've only been here since Sunday yet you've already blocked several posters who disagree with you. It seems to me you're terrified of posters who disagree with you and can't handle their posts.
     
    wist43 likes this.
  10. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Im not here to convince you. I supported my stance that American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon. You however have echoed that i did not. Thats fine, but dont exclaim that you refuted anything because you havent. I have the eyewitnesses who saw the American Airlines Boeing crash into the building, i have the debris evidence which showed it belonged to an American Airlines Boeing, and i have the NTSB flight data path transcript which showed said plane takeoff from Dulles and to the impact of the Pentagon. You however are left with.....what exactly? I block posters who repeat themselves and insult....so far you have been cordial.Terrified? Goodness gracious i find those people embarrassing....but you do have a persistent problem...that you deny everything yet believe nothing...thats bordering on trolling if you ask me.
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yep! the DDT! dirty debate tactics! Make an OP saying how rotten the gubmint is, blaming the opposition (troofers) for playing the DDT's they are about to post. Its a preemptive psychological strike used to emotionally disarm readers that no one falls for. They think they are being so sneaky too.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2019
  12. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And I'm not here to go around in circles with you. If the Pentagon issue is the only one you want you want to discuss with me, I'm not interested in or buying your claims of proof so that would end that for me. There are many other topics with respect to 9/11 that I started threads on. Feel free to post whatever you like in those threads appropriate to those topics. Your repetitive claims of proof are not welcome and will not be entertained.
     
  13. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,098
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What are you here for?

    They aren't baseless claims they are evidenced claims. It is up to you to explain the evidence. Here is an example - a very poor one:

    None of the images are real, because magic fairies planted all the evidence.
    None of the DNA is real, because they are lying.
    None of the large number of witnesses are telling the truth because of a couple who vaguely contradicted them.

    Feel free to once again evade all the evidence and make the ludicrous claim of burden of proof.

    Irrelevant to this thread! How come not one of you truthers has actually responded to the OP. Collectively you have turned it into yet another off topic denial-fest. Way to go Bob. You're good at it.
     
  14. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male

    I will in time post to those topics and i will create some of mine own as well. My repetitive claims of proof are indeed going to be posted because they are evidence to American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon. However the only repetition i saw in this thread came from you Bob. Your adamant denial of the evidence was seen in multiple posts and in other previous threads as well. Now i know where you stand on this issue, which is no stand at all.
     
  15. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry still irrelevant, boring and worthless. What you believe you know is meaningless to me.
     
  16. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Its meaningless to you because you cannot disprove anything i say.
     
  17. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,098
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This whole thing about such behaviour encompasses the entire spectrum of conspiracy theorists. They always fail to offer a better alternative to fit evidence. They ignore evidence. They repeat the same claims over and over.

    Not one of them will ever admit a single thing, it's just not in their nature.
     
    Adam Fitzgerald likes this.
  18. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    I dont like to generalize, i give every individual the chance at explaining their position. But i have been reading many of the posts on here before i even started to comment. Most of the people who deny even the physical evidence, it seemed their only recourse was to personally admit all of it is false and offer absolutely no viable explanation. I would just simply rather weed out those who cannot have a discussion from those who can. Im not here to try and convert anybody, but i sure as wont entertain those who'se only agenda is to simply repeat themselves and offer no value to future discussion.
     
  19. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not interested in trying to disprove your delusional beliefs that you've proven something about 9/11.
     
  20. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Then so be it. You will stay ignorant on this subject then.
     
  21. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yet another delusional claim from the self proclaimed 9/11 "educator". You have yet to educate me about anything that has to do with 9/11. You have educated me about you though I'll give you that. Unfortunately it isn't flattering.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2019
  22. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    If anything i claimed was delusional it wouldnt be this hard for you to empirically disprove it. And your opinion about me is redundant. But this is all you were concentrating on since my OP, about me, this isnt about me...its about the information which you cannot address.
     
  23. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not interested, sorry. When and if you have something interesting that I'd like to discuss with you, you'll know. Try another 9/11 topic perhaps, until then you can always discuss the "merits" of the OCT with your fellow OCT defenders/apologists. I'm sure they can offer you reassurances that the fairy tale is reality and any deviation from the party line is for the tin foil hat wearing crowd.
     
  24. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Its perfectly fine Bob, you should move on from this area. As for reassurances, i dont need a single person to adorn me with such. Im not here for an audience. Although some people certainly are in such desperate need for attention.
     
  25. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah I probably should have never bothered posting in this thread given the idiotic title.
     

Share This Page