The Apollo Moon Missions Were Faked in a Studio

Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by Scott, Jun 5, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
    There's nothing there that gives the impression that I didn't know there were two movements. You're projecting what you want to see.


    If you value BetaMax's opinion so much, go look at post #12 of this thread.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/362999-air-caused-flag-move-so-obviously-studio.html
     
  2. frenat

    frenat Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    That is your opinion. I already showed I wasn't the only person that thought that about your posts. Maybe YOU should make an attempt to be more clear in your writing.

    You can't even link to the appropriate post? Why should I care about a post in a different thread that is nothing but you attempting character assassination and poisoning the well because you can't address the argument so you attack the poster. We get it. You can't go more than a few posts without resorting to logical fallacies. Though it is nice of you to continually point out your flaws.
     
  3. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Anyone who take the time to look at the posts to which you linked in post #574 can see that I simply wasn't talking about the two distict movements. I was talking about something else. Are you saying that my talking about something else means that I didn't know there were two distinct movements?

    Anyone who reads the whole thread...
    http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/362999-air-caused-flag-move-so-obviously-studio.html

    ...will see that I did address the argument. In addition to that, I pointed out that he has no credibility? Your misrepresenting what happens on other threads may fool a few viewers who don't take the time to look at them but it's not fooling the viewers who take the time to look at them.
     
  4. frenat

    frenat Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2011
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Anyone? I've shown two people who didn't get that from your posts. Perhaps you were TRYIND to talk about something else but it APPEARED as I described. AGAIN, maybe you should make an attempt to be more clear in your writing. Don't blame other people for your inability to communicate correctly.

    On the contrary, I want any viewers (where are they?) to see the whole thread. Then they'll see you ignore explanations, and often resort to multiple logical fallacies. Hilarious by the way that you now say "read the whole thread" when the single POST that you referred to was as I described, nothing but character assassination and poisoning the well. Thanks again for showing everyone how you can't go more than a few posts without resorting to logical fallacies. Again, it is nice of you to continually point out your flaws.
     
  5. One Mind

    One Mind Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2014
    Messages:
    18,816
    Likes Received:
    7,070
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think one of the astronauts once punched one of these nuts in the nose. I think it was in order to do that. But I don't think the blow was hard enough to knock some sense into their heads.
     
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was Buzz Aldrin second man to walk on the moon. He was the pilot of the Apollo 11 mission and set foot on the moon right after Neil Armstrong.

    The video is available on you tube. He really decked the guy and the idiot had it coming. He was badgering and intensely provoking Aldrin calling him a liar and DEMANDING Aldrin swear on a bible. He also poked Aldrin in the chest with his finger. No criminal charges were brought and as far as I know no civil suit, if there was any litigation it was probably thrown out. The guy had it coming and got clocked by an older guy.

    Simple fact none of the lunar missions were faked and not one piece of evidence in any thread or video proves otherwise.

    Sheeple like Scott ignore any significant challenges and evidence in order to repaat what they are too simple minded to grasp
     
  7. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
  9. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
  10. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,368
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Then we can stop right there. That sentence excludes you completely.

    Anyone with even a modicum of logical thought and critical thinking , "who takes the time to look at the proof" will know beyond any shadow of a doubt that the USA landed 12 men on the Moon and brought back pictures and samples.

    I think it laughable that you have managed to create 3 identical threads on this one forum.

    Spam debunked:-

    http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.co.uk/
     
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    16,631
    Likes Received:
    2,502
    Trophy Points:
    113
    frenat and (deleted member) like this.
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I posted the second one because the first one had gotten bumped off of the "moon landing" section. I posted the third one because the second one had gotten bumped off of the "moon landing" section. I still hadn't noticed that they could be accessed by logged in members and still posted on when I did that. If I'd noticed that in time, I wouldn't have started the other two threads. I'm glad I did though as a lot of links on the first two had gone dead and I replaced them with new ones that worked.


    Not debunked - obfuscated. the viewers can decide for themselves.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/347662-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio.html


    You also "Debunked" the proof that the Chinese spacewalk was real.

    (see post #12 of this thread)
    http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/362999-air-caused-flag-move-so-obviously-studio.html
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The 'viewers' have seen,time and again,and have dismissed your wall of spam as junk......give it up
     
  14. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,368
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You created spam copies because you couldn't work out the simple display default.

    The viewers have decided already. You lost again. Maybe there is a forum out there where you get more than a couple of mad supporters, but this isn't it.

    Shape memory. You had no answer to it, so denied it. In a vacuum even the slightest force will allow movement because there is no resistance at all.

    http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/chinese-spacewalks-part-1.html

    Every post ignored on the subject and a conclusion that the maker of your film has been got at concerning Apollo when he has never even expressed anything concerning it. Meanwhile folks like Jarrah, David Percy and spammers like yourself are left to freely do what they wish. You seem to lack the mental ability to see how that doesn't stack up.

    What now? One of your "I'd better post this link again" posts!
     
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
  16. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,368
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You seem content in your head in the sand dishonesty. Quite a contrary position for a "truther"!

    spamming yet another link to a thread where you lost a debate. The word "thwart" is not a means to avoid points raised. I was quite correct in my conclusion:-

    What now? One of your "I'd better post this link again" posts!
     
  17. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
  18. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,368
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Nobody takes any notice of you cosmored, nobody. You keep referring to "viewers" but they never arrive to back up or agree with you. You do this all over the internet.

    Making posts that avoid answering rebuttal is what you always do. Evasion is not trothing.
     
  19. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Something tells me we're in a minority, Scott? [​IMG] They're really gonna feel stupid when the cat finally gets out of the bag.
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I doubt that 'cat' was ever in any bag.....useless spam and lies from the moon hoaxers
     
  21. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Er, do I detect a bit of defensiveness there? A sort of sheepishness mebbe?? Wake up and smell it, buddy, they're taking you for a ride. This has reminded me to change my sig. to Do not follow the herd - be of independent mind.
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Er,you detect nothing...no maybes,might's,probably's or could have been's,We went to the moon and walked upon it's surface six times,period

    NO amount of lying spam can prove otherwise
     
  23. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,552
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There's a difference betwixt spam and discussion y'know! [​IMG] Anyhoo, if you say you went to the moon I'll take your word for it because I can't prove you didn't. I'm glad you got back alright.
     
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The collective 'we',shorty,I was 8 years old in 1969.
     
  25. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,863
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page