The Apollo Moon Missions Were Faked in a Studio

Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by Scott, Dec 10, 2012.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. truth and justice

    truth and justice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    25,732
    Likes Received:
    8,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think someone was playing a joke on you....
     
  2. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,518
    Likes Received:
    27,044
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Even Hubble can't resolve any of the landers on the lunar surface :laughing: LRO can, but that's in orbit around that big dustball.
     
  3. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Those LRO pictures were fakable so they don't prove anything.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRE7grId3sI
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKj5fckUX-c
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qc2kijG8YdY


    When I started this thread a few days ago, this thread...
    http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-landing/190138-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio.html

    ...had been deleted from the "Moon Landing" section. I wouldn't have started this thread if the other thread had still been here. It reappeared after I'd started this thread.
     
  4. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is possible someone else altered the NASA footage. If it can be faked, it can't be proof.

    You see, scott, when you use a bull(*)(*)(*)(*) maxim like "if it can be faked, it can't be proof", that maxim can also be used against you to disprove your "evidence". I realize you're childish enough to believe your retarded reasons for dismissing evidence should only be used to dismiss evidence YOU don't like, but that isn't how things work here in the real world. Maybe you should visit the real world some time and see the difference. ;-)
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's rather spurious reasoning scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c/rocky.....your reasoning means because my drivers license can be faked,if I'm stopped,the police don't have to accept it as valid.



    horsehockey.
     
  6. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,518
    Likes Received:
    27,044
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Your YouTubes are fakable, so they don't prove anything. :yawn:
     
  7. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here's some fairly new stuff I just found.
    http://www.aulis.com/mythbusters.htm


    http://www.aulis.com/edgar_mitchell.htm
    (excerpt)
    --------------------------------------
    Dr Mitchell explained that the stars were 'magnificent', and described them as being 'ten times brighter' than when observed from Earth.
    --------------------------------------

    I looked for a video of him saying that but I couldn't find one. It's probably true though.

    Now listen to Collins at the 00:20 time mark of this video.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyjppxh2-C0

    He said he couldn't remember seeing any stars. Mitchell saw lots of stars and Collins didn't see any stars.
     
  8. Gorn Captain

    Gorn Captain Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    35,580
    Likes Received:
    237
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Isn't it remarkable how we had the advanced technology to "fake" a Moon landing in 1969....but didn't have the advanced technology to land on the Moon???

    And how everybody that's "supposedly" "been in space"...is a liar?
     
  9. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The reason that there are so many anomalies in the footage is that the technology used to fake it wasn't advanced.

    Look how they simulated lunar gravity on Apollo 11.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHwzyqICYTM
    (30:35 time mark)

    They used a simple slow-motion.

    The hoax-believer position is that they had the technology to go to the moon in a scenario of radiation-free space in which the craft didn't need heavy shielding. The anomalies showed that they faked it so, if they didn't go even though they had the technology to go, there must be another factor involved. Go back to post #2 and read the info on space radiation.
     
  10. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here's a video that I posted in post #1 which went off-line.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIy8ZqqK5G8

    If this one goes off-line, do a YouTube search on "Conspiracy Theory : Did We Land on the Moon ?. (FULL) (February 2001)".
     
  11. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hog snot. The Russian idiots sold you a bill of goods. Their light was not intensive enough, nor did it reflect off a wide enough area.

    It only looks like solid proof to dimwits.
     
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is an easy one to obfuscate. A disinfo agent could obfuscate endlessly with that anomaly. Jay Windley gave a different explanation.
    http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=251326
    (post #3)

    Why do you two give different explanations?

    Jay Windley also showed himself to be less-than-credible in that thread when he said that just transporting and placing dust-free sand would cause enough erosion to create enough dust to cause a dust cloud when the sand is driven over.

    This is who Jay Windley is.
    http://www.clavius.org/about.html

    I don't know if that thread looks the same in all parts of the world so here's post #5.
    This is what made me wonder.
    http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222
    (excerpt)
    -----------------------------
    Canceling posts. Posts disappear or only propagate in a limited region. This has deniability as just network problems, since sometimes there really are network problems. One technique is to secretly "localize" posts that are not approved by some censor or gatekeeper. Most people will not notice if their post only appears on their local news server, and will assume it has propagated worldwide. They will just think no one has replied (though spoof replies can be posted locally, too).
    -----------------------------

    My posts usually get deleted there when I post stuff the pro-Apollo people can't try to obfuscate without looking silly. This time they didn't get deleted. Does everyone see what I posted above in post #5?
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Stop whining scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c...

    NO ONE is deleting the stuff you post

    All your lies are still here

    besides,you spend most of your time in ad hominem as opposed to discussing your tripe.
     
  14. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I just went back to my personal message section at JREF. Seventy five of my posts were deleted and five of my posts were edited.

    It's difficult to make my case at JREF. The posts in which I make my main points are usually gone the next day and the thread has the appearance that I chickened out and left when I had really cornered the pro-official version posters. The moderators use their power to make sure that the threads have the appearance that the pro-official version posters have the upper hand in debates.

    I expected my whole discussion here to be deleted the next day.
    http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=251326
    http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=251660

    I was surprised when it was still there; its still being there the next day broke the pattern.
     
  15. MannieD

    MannieD New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,127
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
  16. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    First of all, go back and read post #34.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-...sions-were-faked-studio-4.html#post1062209152

    They didn't have the technology to fake it convincingly but they had the technology to do a lousy job of faking it. Go look at the anomalies in the footage and still pictures. They are very clear. They're in the first few posts of page one.

    Here's another thread about that video on which the pro-Apollo people are looking silly.
    http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=251660

    They obviously don't even believe their own arguments.
     
  17. MannieD

    MannieD New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,127
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You didn't watch the video I posted, did you? Care to address any of the video's points like the size of the film canister required or the lack of video technology needed to produce hours of slo mo video.
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If this board is any indication of what you post at JREF,they probably edited all your spam posts saying the same thing,over,and over,and over...

    Suck it up scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c..NO ONE who has a brain is swallowing your line of spurious anomolies.
     
  19. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    These two clips show obvious fakery so there must be an explanation.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gn6MTrin5eU
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7yc2rVOs00

    Maybe they had classified technology that wasn't known to the public.

    On this board, when the pro-official version people can't debunk an argument, they try to bury it to reduce the number of people who see it. The only way to thwart that tactic is to repost the info. Here are some examples.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...-american-77-hit-pentagon.html#post1062188283
    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...911-truther-movements-etc.html#post1062219107

    Here's a post that was deleted at JREF...
    http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?p=7223911#post7223911
    ...from this thread.
    http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=85880

    They deleted my posts and all of the answers to my posts. The only identifiable reason they had for deleting my post on that thread was that they didn't want people to see alternative info. They want the discussions to stay inside the box so that people will keep thinking inside the box. There was no valid reason to delete that post.
     
  20. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Here's another post that was deleted at JREF. I have to copy and paste it as only logged in members can see their deleted posts in the "Abandon All Hope" section after about two weeks.
    That post was deleted from this thread.
    http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=223544

    There was no valid reason to delete that post. The moderators use their power to control the direction debates take. If a truther posts something the pro-official version people can't try to obfuscate without looking silly, the moderators just delete it.
     
  21. MannieD

    MannieD New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,127
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why should I bother viewing your video if you don't bother with any information that destroys your arguments?
    The "classified technology" argument is addressed in the video.
    And I'm done with you. The main purpose of my video link wasn't to try to persuade you, but to give sensible people some information they may not have known.
    Good bye for now.
     
  22. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  23. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NO,the videos don't...

    They had upwards of400,000 people working on the space program,and they couldn't spend time correcting the mistakes you dreamed up,scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c?
     
  24. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This statement doesn't make the mistakes go away. They're still there and as clear as ever. Go to page #1 and start looking at them.

    Here's something else.

    http://theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/28159
    (excerpts)
    ---------------------------------------------
    Q: Why do prominent astronomers like Sir Bernard Lovell and Patrick Moore support the Moon landings if they were faked?

    A: Scientists and astronomers around the globe know full well that the Moon missions were faked, but rely on NASA to gain access to the vital data beamed back to Earth from the Hubble space telescope. They cannot slag off NASA otherwise NASA would deprive them of this essential information, which they so much require.
    ---------------------------------------------
    Q: What about the vast number of people involved in Apollo, wouldn’t someone have spoken out.

    A: Pan’s claim there were half a million people involved in the Apollo program, but that includes all the humble engineers working on machine parts in many companies around the globe. So if someone is making a part in some engineering factory in Seattle, and his boss tells him it’s for the Apollo spacecraft, is that engineer proof the landings took place? No of course it is not proof, and even if that engineer knew they never made it to the Moon, he would still brag to his friends that he made a part that went to the Moon just to make him feel proud in some way or other. Parts for the Apollo program were made at many different factories around the globe. For example the laser reflector supposedly left on the Moon was manufactured in France. NASA collected the unit from the French company, and that was the last they saw of it. It’s probably stashed away in some archive at Langley, but one things for certain it’s not on the Moon. Are those French engineers proof they landed on the Moon? No of course not, as very few, (probably less than 200 people), were actually involved in bringing the whole lot together, so as to minimize what was actually taking place. No need for any of them to speak out because (A) They are 100% patriotic to the USA, and would say nothing that would go against America, even if it were true. (B) They do not need millions of dollars to safeguard their future, as they have already received substantial amounts from NASA just to “keep mum”. Read comments from people who worked on the Apollo program in the APOLLO FEEDBACK section.
    ---------------------------------------------
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There were NO 'mistakes',just false assumptions by you and the rest of you moon hoaxer cohorts

    And Once again,the reflector was made by the bendix corporation here in the USA,stop lying and saying it was made in 'france'

    Honestly,how can you continue on with this fools errand?
     

Share This Page