The Apollo Moon Missions Were Faked in a Studio

I think you show cognitive dissonance on a par with mental illness. Quite clearly we do see dark prints, that are flat. This is only possible on wet sand on Earth. But we also see very fine scattering of dust, only possible with dry sand on Earth.

If you spent the same time viewing the 45-50 hours of surface footage properly, instead of spamming your hogwash, you may be able to see more than you bargained for. However, knowing your ways, nothing will change your bizarre mind.

The two videos you have been given show it. You are hoaxblind.

 

The Mars Rover may not be running over the red planet but over an island in Canada.

Here is a video of a guy who is comparing images of the island with the images of the surface of Mars sent by the Rover.

The most interested point is that NASA does practices over there, and the Rover that runs in this island is not the same model we are used to see by NASA's pictures.

This guy in his video using Photoshop changes the reddish color of the pictures from Mars and give them the same color tones of the island surface.

The similitudes are great. Now, it should be nice to send a private expedition and see if any of the pictures of Mars is like to any mountain or view in one of these Canadian islands. The chosen island by this guy is the isle of Devon.

[video=youtube;478Q8nOXCCM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=478Q8nOXCCM[/video]

 

You are correct.

Now, please, explain why the Moon Rovers won't leave tire prints on the Moon in several pictures while the astronauts foot prints are seen by lots?

This guy in his video is not saying that the Moon Rovers didn't run on the Moon surface, he just ask, as I do now, where are the tires' prints?

The only answer so far is that the Rovers -in several pictures- were lifted and dropped over the surface in order to take a good picture... but there are no records that such a machine was sent to the Moon to lift up the Rovers...

Too bad the videos of this guy are in Spanish, still, you can see the pictures and no tires prints are seen on the Moon surface while the astronauts foot prints are everywhere. Of course that there are pictures and videos where one can see the Moon Rovers moving around... but it was the Moon? Really?


[video=youtube;FVyEue2835Y]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=FVyEue2835Y[/video]

 

Here[video=youtube;9fYi6la33sk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fYi6la33sk[/video]

And here [video=youtube;E4t2k0BI72U]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4t2k0BI72U[/video]

 

I just watched this whole video and I didn't see one such case.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk5GiF_mX5w

Could you please link to a video which shows such a case and show the time mark? I'm having trouble finding the stuff you people tell me is out there. Please show it precisely.


Here's some stuff about the Mars missions.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=marsfaker

Curiosity Rover is a fake. Road on Mars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHZ5YqgpABo


I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out that the Mars missions were being faked too. If NASA can do it once, they can do it again.

 

Bottom line: parachutes work on Mars the same way they work on Earth. Thinner atmosphere - less drag, all other things being equal. Do you really think the laws of physics are different on Mars? Since there is less atmosphere, they cannot slow the craft to landing speed so need to be jettisoned clear of the craft before other mechanical means are used to land with but they do slow the craft since Mars has an atmosphere. Also, the illogical comparison of a parachute jumper on earth. How many parachute jumpers use a mortar to launch their parachutes?

 

Why would curiosity be fake?...we have the technology,and no humans are in danger......You've just fallen in love with your outlandish lies

 

Mars missions use retrofire,parachutes and a landing bag system to land on mars...they've gotten creative..

 

I think I made it clear in my post that I haven't taken a firm stand on the Mars missions. I just won't be surprised if it turns out that they're being faked.


What do you people think of this?

Curiosity Rover is a fake. Road on Mars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHZ5YqgpABo

 

Spam...

 

Here's something else about the rover.

Lunar rover on the moon. Was it a RC model? (Extended Edition)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK3R2en4p_8


Is this spam too?

 

Yes,it's nonsensical spam.....cherry picking video to show only what bolsters his argument is dishonest......https://youtu.be/EwZW4nkz51A

 

The guy seems sincere and he is an expert in the field. The fact that the rover driver's left arm never changes position does seem a little strange. Doesn't it make you a little suspicious?

Check it out at the 1:19 time mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK3R2en4p_8

 

'expert' my ass...he's just another silly moon hoaxer..

The nature of the pressurized suits had their arms appear outstreched,and besides,he moved it,and at one point flexed his fingers

 

Could you please post a time mark for that?

 

No,open your eyes It's the ly time his left arm is facing the camera

 

Is this still going on? LOL!!!

I can't believe ANYONE would believe that the Soviet Union would allow such a Hoax to exist!

Especially during a space race during the Cold War.

It's insane.

AboveAlpha

 

You might as well give up, Scott, because it's impossible to open a closed mind - especially a gullible closed mind. Read my current signature.

 

Yes, I'm aware of that but I'm not trying to make them see the light. I think they know the moon missions were hoaxed as well as the hoax-believers do. I think you've seen this info before.
http://ombudsmanwatchers.org.uk/articles/twenty_five_ways.html

I know these posters are going to be against all the anomalies I post no matter how clear they are so what I'm doing is posting the clearest ones so that they'll have to say some pretty lame things to maintain their positions. That way the viewers will see what these people really are.

This doesn't make the anomalies go away. You're basing you view on what we read in the mainstream media. What's happening behind the scenes may be very different from what we're being told. Here's some stuff from page one of this thread.

Everyone should read Chomsky's analysis of the cold war.
http://libcom.org/history/articles/cold-war-1940-1989?quicktabs_1=0
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On the domestic front, the Cold War helped the Soviet Union entrench its military-bureaucratic ruling class in power, and it gave the US a way to compel its population to subsidise high-tech industry. It isn't easy to sell all that to the domestic populations. The technique used was the old stand-by-fear of a great enemy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.nardwuar.com/vs/bill_kaysing/index.html
(excerpt)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, why did they keep faking the Apollo flights, I still don't understand. Did the Soviet Union know it was faked? Why did they keep shut up if they knew it was faked? 'Cause a lot of people would think they kept the moon race going to prove the U.S. was better than the Soviet Union. If the Soviet Union knew, why did they let the U.S. get away with this?
Well, I'll tell you - at the highest levels there is a coalition between governments. In other words, the Soviets said, if you won't tell on us - and they faked most of their space exploration flights - we won't tell on you. It's as simple as that. See, what Apollo is, is the beginning of the end of the ability of the government to hoodwink and bamboozle and manipulate the people. More and more people are becoming aware in the U.S. that the government is totally and completely public enemy number one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Soviets, with their own competing moon program and an intense economic and political and military rivalry with the USA, could be expected to have cried foul if the USA tried to fake a Moon landing. Theorist Ralph Rene responds that shortly after the alleged Moon landings, the USA silently started shipping hundreds of thousands of tons of grain as humanitarian aid to the allegedly starving USSR. He views this as evidence of a cover-up, the grain being the price of silence. (The Soviet Union in fact had its own Moon program).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=moonfaker+cold+war&aq=f

I still don't see it. Please post the precise time in minutes and seconds. I'm not sure what you mean by "ly".

 

There is no evidence of a hoax and no one believes that any of the landings were hoaxed.

You know they were real as well.

Your assertions have been repeatedly torn to shreds debunked and buried.

Every time you claim to have evidence you are PROVEN wrong and made to look like a fool.

You just cling to empty stupid assertions because you are too immature to admit it

 

I'm with Scott all the way. One day NASA's gonna slip up and there aren't half going to be some red faces around. Not mine or Scott's though.

 

UGGGHHH!

You think the Soviets in the middle of a space race would not know if it was a hoax???

It would be 1000 times more difficult to make this a hoax than actually do it.

We did it.

AboveAlpha

 

Look at the bottom of post #1. There's some stuff about the Soviets that you should check out.

 

Try answering for once

 

B.S.

AA