The Attempt to Establish a Climate Ministry of Truth

I’m would never take the word of a blog and use it for anything but joke material.

I read material published by…3400 other institutional sources.


Maybe in your circles you take the word of a blog. You’re entitled to. Is he the first guy with a degree in math you have ever met ? Just asking.

 

Irrelevant. BBC dishonesty is the topic.

 

Nope not interested. They might not have voted for Al Gore.

 

It’s relevant because it was brought up by the poster for a blogger defended as a qualification. Good to see you’re an AlGore fan . What does Al say about Climate ministry of truth ?.

 

BBC dishonesty is the topic.

 

Does it upset you that a blogger claimed BBC was dishonest ? Were you so impressed by the post you never bothered to check other sources ?

 

The dishonesty was broadcast. It's public.

 

Maybe you can’t read my post. I don’t use blogs as a reference.

 

How do you know it’s true ?

 

It was a BBC broadcast. Seen by millions.

 

Let’s hear one of these outright fabrications from a reliable left wing source, like NASA or the AAAS or EPIC or 3400 accredited universities and research facilities.

 

No, I asked, how do you know the blog is true.

 

Climate Audit reported what was seen by millions, and linked to the BBC program.

 

BBC’s Fake Climate Audit Screengrab

 

The BBC is far left ? Ha ha

 

What specifically did the lie about and what is your source ?

 

Yes, they are.

 

BBC’s Fake Climate Audit Screengrab

". . . In today’s post, I’m going to parse a short scene in which BBC created a fake Climate Audit screengrab (shown below) in order to introduce me and Climate Audit. In the scene, a police forensic specialist is “explaining” his discoveries to supervising detective inspector Julian Gregory, telling the inspector that this is where the first link to the emails was posted.

But the screengrab is not from Climate Audit, but a fake imitation. While the comments in the screengrab do relate to comments on a Climate Audit article, they are from a different article, with the “A miracle just happened” comment being spliced from the original thread into this thread from a different article. But the BBC didn’t stop the fabrication there: they replaced contents of several comments from the original thread with fabrications that appear intended to ridicule the commenters. Then finally, they altered the “A miracle just happened” comment itself by adding link in the comment, but to a website that did not exist at the time, while concealing the actual website at which the email zipfile was originally posted (realclimate.org). I’ll show this in detail: it’s quite bizarre. . . . "

 

Irelavant you’ve made a claim you’ve yet to prove at all. You can’t even state what it is.

 

BBC’s Fake Climate Audit Screengrab

 

One persons opinion from a blog.

 

Evidence. You're just denying.

 

One person’s opinion from a blog. Nope.

 

Evidence. You're in denial.

 

Evidence you can’t provide.