The Big Lie is (unfortunately) winning

Beyond that, I've asked repeatedly and they won't answer.

If all Dems are stupid and incapable of understanding the importance of voting for Reps. how did they pull this off?
Why did Trump say that he likes it when minorities don't vote?
Why are they working around the clock trying to disenfranchise eligible voters through redistricting?
Why are R governors trying to pass laws to force social media sites not to ban people that break their TOS?
Why hasn't Trump come up with anything other than his incessant whining to prove his claims of fraud?
Why don't current Rs recognize something is wrong when they get rid of Cheney and Romney for not parroting the Big Lie?
Will they invoke their double-standard to vote for Trump in 2024 when he will be the same age Biden was (and was deemed "too old")?
Why do they ignore the mountains of evidence that clearly shows Trump is nothing but a loud-mouth, bully con artist?

 

One word: cult.

 

As I'm sure you've noticed, they just call them Democrats. It's the Big Lie, with the Little Lie inside.

 

Don't they just dismiss them as RINOs and/or corrupt?

It's really difficult to make sense of this. If EVERYBODY except one dude (and a few hangers-on) are the ONLY ones saying something, I would think it would start raising some red flags. It kind of frightens me these people are walking around in the general public and seemingly have no sensors that kick off that something just isn't adding up.

 

Nope. They're all Democrats. It's right here and in other threads.

 

If the minority view of a country's population is over represented, it a receipt for very bad things to come.

 

BILLIONAIRES

America's last national vote scrutinized:


Surprise, surprise? Methinks not.

The only element of the voting-dissection that surprise me is the fact that a candidate (Trump) lost the popular-vote but won the presidency. That should never happen and does never-happen in any other democracy on earth. Except uniquely the USofA where it occurred five times in its history!

A True Democracy is where only the popular-vote prevails. Which is why in the US the voting-expression of the "people" can be hidden in the Electoral College and how it "manipulates" the popular-vote.

We like to THINK we are living in a popular-vote democracy - but that is not always the case.

Aint no way to run a democracy ....

 

It hasnt been completed. When it is it will be the first and only.

 

And they found nothing and are stalling as long as possible before admitting to this fact

 

Actually, they're still trying to get all the information Maricopa County is refusing to turn over for audit.

 

Yeah, ok. You keep holding on to that, I am sure it will keep you warm this winter.

 

Just making sure the correct facts were posted.

 

That would be a first.

 

Oh, pleas. That's a load of fresh manure, on top of truckloads of the same that have been being pedaled since trump first announced. The culprits here from day one ARE DEMOCRATS, LIBERALS AND SOCIALISTS.

When a person looks back and sees the devastation resulting from their own decisions and realized they acted like idiots, they are learning.
When they look back and don't see anything wrong, they are STILL IDIOTS.

How much of your nation will have to be destroyed in front of your eyes before you recognize that the people you support are the people responsible for it?

 

Yeah, nope.

 

Geez, a governor, or a judge, or an unelected election board of directors, cannot simply "adjust the laws" to suit them. There is a legal process for state legislatures to write laws, and for the governor to sign them into law. there is another process to amend those laws. If you cannot comprehend the simply legal process of for laws are created and amended, then I cannot help you.

 

The emergency powers granted to governors are perfectly legal.

 

Utter nonsense. Go ahead and cite the state "emergency powers" law, where it allows the governor to willy-nilly change election laws as he sees fit, or empowers judges and election board members to do the same. I'll wait.

I can see it now, each flu season a governor can declare a medical emergency and change election laws to best allow his political party to win election. Yeah, sounds like utter chaos, Democrats will love it.

 

Pretty much every change was challenged in court and the only opinion that really matter ruled if they were legal or not.

 

Well, it's not legal for governors, or judges on unelected boards to bypass the state legislature to change election laws. Apparently, the federal courts don't think anyone has standing to challenge the illegal manner in which election laws were violated.

 

There were multiple cases heard all the way up to SCOTUS.

 

I sincerely request that you please explain why you feel that way? What evidence or proof of widespread fraud - enough to change the national election results - do you have?

 

First, many people don't even claim that fraud was "widespread" - just a few counties in a few swing states. It's amazing how few places you'd need to actually cheat to change a national election.

 

Read the court cases.

 

Why are you setting arbitrary limitations and using subjective words like "widespread" in order to establish MY opinion?

The fact that you have to claim widespread, or enough fraud to change elections, means you know damn well the integrity of the elections isn't sound... but you are working to dismiss it because it isn't a big deal to you.

You can claim all you want that it's not widespread. But there are no mechanisms in place to prove that. That's precisely the point. Every study that claims that it was the "fairest election" is using the same non-existent information to draw that conclusion. It's extremely difficult to find fraud, because the left has done everything in their power to make sure it's that way. Then, they claim as you are doing now, that there is little evidence of fraud.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.




There is a reason for this, and I absolutely believe it's nefarious.