You want to claim you are so smart that you can discard what is said by the entire world of climatologists, chemists, physicists, an oceanographers working on this problem. Sorry - I see NO evidence of that. All I see is you making totally unsupported claims of you being smarter than them all!
My selection criteria have to do with what the entire world of climatologists are agreeing on. Your attempt to suggest I have a thumb on the scale is just you ignoring every post I have ever written and making really stupid assumptions.
Just as you think that you can discard the commentary and evidence assembled by those of us who have compiled the repudiation narrative of those you just enshrined. Why is that? Certainly, you understand that the empiric data doesn't support the outcomes of the models that you harp about. You cannot be that dense. And because we know this, it becomes a qualified conversation that you'd bash others against to suggest that the worst possible outcome is the one we much act against? This is a political forum. No one accepts that level of hysteria as actionable for policy. Answer the following. What is the temperature supposed to be, for each day, for each location around the globe. Tick tock...
Well then, you know very little about the 'entire world of climatologists'. Just because you resort to the logical fallacy of appeal to authority does not mean you are right. In fact you couldn't be more wrong but that is how logical fallacies work.
What is special about that criteria? Prior to Galileo, folks universally noted that the sun revolved around the earth. And here you are. Is it really flat there too??
You do understand there's on average between 50 and 60 volcanic eruptions every year So there have been around 2,200 eruptions since Mount St Helens.
Doesn't mean you are wrong. So on the whole unless you can claim you have more knowledge than the climatologists then all you have is the 14,000 reports from scientists agreeing it is AGW. That or the fringe bloggers cherry picking bits of info to keep the cult followers onboard.
Somehow you think all climatologists are in agreement. That is an erroneous assumption but if it is your blanket to ignore inconvenient science then so be it.
I'm sticking with the Chairman of the Racah Center for Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and IBM Einstein Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study. How Climate Change Pseudoscience Became Publicly Accepted
https://news.yahoo.com/day-tomorrow-film-foretold-real-124000312.html 'The Day After Tomorrow' film foretold a real and troubling trend: The Atlantic ocean's circulation system is weakening The cool down is coming. Moi
AGW. That Man produced increases in atmospheric Co2 are increasing the earths overall temperature and that the changes this will cause going forward will prove very expensive to the humans inhabiting the planet.
Because he says what you want to hear. What about all the other 14,000 studies that disagree with your view, do you dismiss them all as propaganda?
https://news.yahoo.com/3-volcanoes-located-along-alaskas-145613235.html 3 volcanoes located along Alaska's Pacific 'Ring of Fire' are erupting at the same time Sophia Ankel Sat, August 14, 2021, 7:56 AM·2 min read The Pavlof Volcano spews ash in the Aleutian Islands of Alaska. This picture was taken of a different volcanic eruption back in March 2016. US Coast Guard/Lieutenant Commander Nahshon Almandmoss/Handout via Reuters Three volcanoes are erupting at the same time on a remote island chain in Alaska. Two of the volcanoes are spewing low levels of ash and steam. The eruptions have not affected any nearby communities or disrupted air travel, officials said. See more stories on Insider's business page. Three volcanoes on a remote island chain in Alaska have been erupting simultaneously for more than a week, NBC reported. Two of the volcanoes, located on the 800-mile stretch of the Aleutian island chain, are spewing low levels of ash and steam. Other volcanoes, including Pavlof, Great Sitkin, and Semisopochnoi Volcano, are under an orange threat level, which signals that eruptions are underway. But due to their remote location, the eruptions currently don't pose a threat to any nearby communities. They have also not disrupted air travel, NBC reported. It is not unusual for this area, also known as the "Ring of Fire," to experience volcanic eruptions since it is located along the rim of the Pacific Ocean, where many of the world's earthquakes and volcanic eruptions occur. "Alaska has a lot of volcanoes, and we typically see maybe one eruption every year, on average," Matthew Loewen, a research geologist with the Alaska Volcano Observatory, told NBC News. "To have three erupting at once is less common, but it does happen." Scientists continue to closely monitor the volcanoes for signs of changes. A 6.9 earthquake struck off the coast of the Alaskan Peninsula early Saturday morning, the U.S. Geological Survey reported. Harbingers of the BIG Cool Down is Coming Moi
Three volcanoes in the same chain. Oh no Three volcanoes on the same subduction zone.. hmm, how could they all go off together.. Must be god getting angry.
I didn't ask for the score or whether it was a democracy, I asked if in your opinion all the 14,000 other studies are wrong.
If YOU Live In Texas I Guess YOU Believe Austin, Texas https://news.yahoo.com/study-warmer-arctic-led-killer-211812839.html Study: Warmer Arctic led to killer cold in Texas, much of US Warming of the Arctic caused by climate change has increased the number of polar vortex outbreaks, when frigid air from the far north bathes the central and eastern United States in killer cold, a study finds. “It is counterintuitive that a rapidly warming Arctic can lead to an increase in extreme cold in a place as far south as Texas, but the lesson from our analysis is to expect the unexpected with climate change,” Cohen said. “The Texas cold blast of February 2021 is a poster child" for the link between a changing Arctic and cold blasts in lower latitudes, said climate scientist Jennifer Francis of the Woodwell Climate Research Center on Cape Cod. She helped pioneer the Arctic link theory, but wasn't part of Cohen’s research. “The study takes this controversial hypothesized linkage and moves it solidly toward accepted science,” she said. The authors show that the melting of ice in the Barents and Kara seas leads to increased snowfall over Siberia and a transfer of excess energy that impacts the swirling winds in the stratosphere above the North Pole. The heat ultimately causes a stretching of the vortex which then enables extremely cold weather to flow down to the US. . . Have FAITH The Cool Down Is Coming And create hardships not as easily managed as a Warm Up. Consider food production and distribution. Advice: Be Friends With Mormons. They stock 1 year supplies. Moi
Have faith climate change is here. All the adaptions civilisation has in place for human habitation will need to be adjusted at huge cost.
