how do I know? You haven't told me what they are yet. You've never even posted OWS before this post, and the one is said "huh" in you simply posted ANFTA. Make your point.
actually it's a legal fact. It's why your citizenship is US, and not texas (or whatever state you reside in). It's also why federal law supersedes state law. sorry.
It's not in the constitution, which was my original point. The constitution nowhere mentions "nation".
which I've addressed. That is irrelevant. irrelevant. The constitution nowhere mentions H&K P2000 either. But it's protected. Meanwhile, the US remains a single sovereign nation.
That wasn't a question. It was a statement: So we agree that nowhere in the constitution does it refer to a nation.
You repeat yourself! regardless of the success of States! Some might interpret the 10th Amendment as Federal over reach with the prohibition of . Alcohol took a Constitutional amendment.
No It Isn't. Marijuana prohibition was Federal over reach. Alcohol prohibition required an amendment. Had had the Federals not backed down from the confrontation we might have witnesses one good Supreme Court case per the 10th. Synopsis: In Practice, It Is Not The Law of The Land! de factolook that up in your Funk & Wagnell (for those who remember, "Laugh In".) @rahl Have YOU met @LafayetteBis ? You two have so much in common
You really should meet, @LafayetteBis PS Edit Quotes as pleases you but, insert a notation it is an edited quote to be honest. Editing quotes is just such a "cheap shot". ?Dishonest?
LOL... Evidently you've never participated in a debate or on a true debate forum. This is not a debate forum.
So you think that @rahl is a troll and not worth engaging? I certainly don't mind engaging for educational purposes. If you think there's no educational justification for continuing the dialog, I will disengage.