The LGBT fraud has been exposed, and they’re definitely not happy about it

For an atheist you seem pretty intent on not believing they all have the god of abraham as their god.
I'm going back to what you said earlier, you believe god is the one described and you are not an atheist.

And you are now dodging what gays have submitted you to do. But that is your typical posting style.

 

Well, "god" consists of a description in a book. Ive read the Koran and bible, very different gods are described.

 

To believe otherwise would require a belief in the existence of a god of Abraham.

 

Both have the god of Abraham. One clan came from Issac, the other Ishmael. Abraham is the father of both. And the god they both believe is the god Abraham believed.
Are you saying the Koran or Islamic faith doesn't have an adam and eve story? A world wide flood?

Again, 3rd time. What has gays forced you to submit to?

 

Putting aside your spurious ad hom violation of PF rules here are plenty of examples of your adopting the standard religious mindset of denial of scientific facts.

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=485055&page=70&p=1066931006#post1066931006
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=485055&page=70&p=1066931144#post1066931144
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=485055&page=64&p=1066909306#post1066909306
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=485055&page=67&p=1066910311#post1066910311
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=485055&page=67&p=1066910353#post1066910353

In this post you are advocating for religious discrimination that is a violation of the constitution.

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=485055&page=64&p=1066908594#post1066908594

So now the onus is on you to provide evidence that your opposition to the rights of homosexuals has some valid basis that is NOT based upon religion. So far you have not provided anything even remotely resembling a rational, logical basis for your hatred of gays.

 

Ironic given that you don't appear to comprehend that your use of a term like "BELIEVE the ONLY god" is a direct contradiction of the meaning of the term atheist.

 

Not when this god is nothing more than a description in a text. What followed after your carefully edited 4 word quote of mine.

 

Im an atheist and don't buy into this stuff.

 

Ironic given that you so obviously do "buy into that stuff"!

 

Sure.
What again is it you've been submitted to do by force by the gay community?
4th time. So no answer this time, and we'll all assume nothing. And your real beef with gays is your religious belief.

 

I buy into the existence of the Koran and Bible that contain text, describing their god. Its called reality.

 

Sucks when people do that, don't it?

As typical, the anti-gay pawns have no basis for rationale behind their view other than talking points and falsehoods - I wouldn't expect a honest answer by Dixon, best you will get is deflection or a rant usually centered around procreation.

 

First- there is no medical test to support the claim that you were "born homosexual"

I understand why you need to believe it and that is called FAITH.

Nobody is looking to deny you from your faith and belief. Also, nobody is looking to deny you from having as much gay-sex as you want.

There is nothing "anti-gay" going on at all.

What there is are demands to honor the Constitution and not treat a sexual choice as being akin to race.

 

Sexual choice is not to be treated as akin to race. It is to be treated the way the constitution treats other choices in that they can not be denied without a compelling government interest. And there is none.

 

perhaps you have been out of country for several years?

Forcing a person to service or preside over a celebration of gay-sex is a violation of Constitutional rights.

It's no different than forcing someone from PETA to service an event where live animals are butchered.

In all the cases it is about a specific event, not a person.

 

Well the supreme court disagrees with you. But we will protect your rights too if a muslim baker does not want to bake a cake for an infidel christian such as yourself. LOL

 

the SCOTUS will soon return to the Constitution and not legislating from the bench

Again, nobody is looking to deny you or anyone else from having gay-sex. We must simply accept that celebrations of the gay lifestyle are very specific events and those who disagree with the gay lifestyle should not fear reprisal from the govt for not servicing those events.

 

You do not have the right to that type of discrimination in the marketplace. Just as we will protect the right of christians in the marketplace we will protect the rights of gays....both are choices by the way.

 

Please quote me as to where I have ever stated one was born homosexual.
That is your strawman - and not even a good one at that.

 

This entire thread is a strawman and a catharsis i suspect.

Everything sec talks about is based upon that strawman.

 

Current medical research points to events that occur in the womb that dictate ones sexual orientation. So yes, homosexuals are born that way.

Testimonies from thousands of homosexuals state that they have known from a very early age that they were attracted to people of the same sex. So yes, homosexuals are born that way.

Also...
Some people are born with an attraction to only people of the opposite sex.
Some people are born with an attraction to people of both sexes.

It's not black and white, it's many shades of grey. It's called nature.

People of all sexuality deserve equal protection under the law just as people of all colors deserve equal protection under the law just as people of all religions (and no religion) deserve equal protection under the law.

 

awesome, and what medical test is performed that confirms one is "born gay"

I'll be sitting over there on that couch as it's going to be a lonnnnngggggg wait as we await for you to provide the medical test

It's great that you believe that you were born homosexual; that is called a belief or faith.

 

A faith that is protected by the constitution by the way.

 

actually it's not. I cannot force you to attend mass any more than you should be able to have the govt force me to cater your celebration of gay sex.

That is the difference and the SCOTUS will soon clarify the mistake that has been made.

In both cases I described they are "events"

 

Please provide a test that proves one is heterosexual or born that way.
I will sit on the couch across from you until you provide the evidence you demand of others.