The moon landing is fake.

Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by Yant0s, Mar 28, 2019.

  1. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63

    This is from post #46.
     
  2. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So let me get this straight. I say there is no evidence for this and you will never provide any. Then you say you have addressed this by admitting that there is no evidence for this and you will never provide any!

    I responded to your complete failure with this:-
    "Pathetic response and illustrating exactly what I said.
    The use of unmanned craft to do this involves at least 3 missions to be launched and tracked, with a team to design and one to build. There is not a scrap of evidence for any of them. "Classified missions" still need very big rockets to reach the Moon and they need one of the few launch windows available to get to the point where they need to."


    You really have no idea how loud and visible lunar targeted rockets are do you!? Perhaps you're going to compound your fabricated claims with fabricated launch sites and fabricated launch windows.

    You always avoid things:-

    If your proof that the Moon landings were hoaxed is a small snippet of video from one mission where you think it behaves like air, where it also behaves like a number of other things and subsequent bodily contact, then you are deluding yourself once again. From a purely scientific standpoint, if you were 100% successful in showing that a flag behaves exactly that way, all you have done is proved that a tiny fragment of isolated video COULD have been faked. Hardly conclusive now is it? 382kg of lunar samples, that's conclusive even if that was all there were. But there are copious scientific reports, video, transcripts, photographs and third party evidence. What can hoax claimants do with the real evidence? Bluff at showing how maybe small segments of it could have been done, but offering no direct proof of that.
     
  3. pitbull

    pitbull Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2018
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Start watching this at the 00:50 time mark.

    Moon Hoax; "Apollo; Hoax Of The 20th Century" Part 1 of 2


    Moon Hoax; "Apollo; Hoax Of The 20th Century" Part 2 of 2



    This guy has the same idea I had. People who can't see all the bad stuff the US government is doing* need to be shaken a bit to make them more open to the fact that it's capable of doing bad stuff. Seeing that Apollo was a hoax should shake a few people up.


    *
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/american-imperialism.371897/
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...orted-9-11-terrorists.456423/#post-1066183060

     
  5. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Repackaged spam. Sadly this person will simply be unable to break these videos down into items not already addressed.
     
  6. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    8,322
    Likes Received:
    1,889
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The moon is fake.
     
  7. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    It's been addressed, but not debunked. You people address stuff and then you do the victory dance as if you'd debunked it when all you did was try to obfuscate it.


    Here's a case where you people "Debunked" something.

    Jay Windley* and the rest of his crew at the Clavius forum** looked silly when they said that just transporting and placing large-grained dust-free sand would cause enough erosion to create enough dust to cause a dust cloud when the sand is driven over.

    http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8135606&postcount=7907
    http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8144391&postcount=7990
    http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=251326


    If I remember correctly, you agreed with him. Those people have buried the issue*** under a mountain of other threads to reduce the number of people who see it and now they're going on as if they hadn't been shown to be wrong on a major issue and therefore not fit to do analysis on Apollo photos and footage.

    Do you still agree with Jay Windley on this? If you do, tell us why. All the viewers are watching and judging.


    *
    http://www.clavius.org/about.html

    **
    http://www.clavius.org/

    ***
    http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15
    (start at post #20)
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2019
  8. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    8,322
    Likes Received:
    1,889
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Don't flatter yourself.
    Nobody is watching your BS, except to laugh.
     
  9. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    How about your making a post with some substance in it. What's your opinion on that issue? Do you agree with Jay Windley?
     
  10. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    It's been addressed and debunked. Every thing within it. Do something honorably for a change - go to those videos and highlight 1 thing from each that you think has not been debunked. - I will then show you where it has been already and put my own analysis on it. I expect you will fail to do this, because you are throwing voluminous crap at the wall - you know quite clearly that once you isolate parts of your crap, they will be seen to be just that.

    One item from each.

    SPAM! Answered literally dozens of times on this very forum. I go with the engineer not the spammer. I think it one of the most insane straw men arguments you make, where you think your opinion should be taken seriously. Not only did I completely debunk your strawman claim, your credibility died in pieces as you denied the obvious.

    http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-dust-free-sand-strawman-claim.443515/
     
  11. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    How about you making one that is unique. You have been spamming the same things for 10 years.
     
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    You're explanations were so lame that it totally discredited you. Your not recognizing this doesn't change anything. I'll post the link again to make sure the viewers see it.
    http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8135606&postcount=7907

    You also said that it was impossible to duplicate the movement of the Apollo flag here on earth by trotting by it.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-moon-landing-is-fake.553296/#post-1070428985

    You have no credibility. You're not fit to analyze Apollo photos or footage. I'd say your success rate at making the viewers think Apollo was real is pretty close to zero and that's all that matters. You're declaring victory means nothing. There's really nothing else for me to do here.

    As I've said before, you're about as impressive as the Black Knight in this video.
    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=black+knight+holy+grail
     
  13. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    8,322
    Likes Received:
    1,889
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He thinks a moon is hanging your ass out the car window.
     
  14. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Translation: I spam. I don't care who replies, what they say or how soundly I am beaten, I will continue to make the same bullshit claims and bullshit cut and paste spam responses.

    I posted a video proving that.

    I don't believe in batshit conspiracy theories - my credibility is just fine. Yours, not so much.

    Basically every single item there is cut and paste, posted before spam.

    Until the next time, spammer.

    Yep, you sure have said that before. Maybe a thousand times in 10 years?

    Now, I asked you quite clearly to offer one piece of evidence, not debunked, from each video. If you are here to debate, post them.
     
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Air making the flag move without its being touched proved the hoax a long time ago.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-move-so-it-was-obviously-in-a-studio.362999/

    Only one clear anomaly is necessary but there are lots more.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-moon-missions-were-faked-in-a-studio.347662/

    You have shown that you're unfit to analyze anomalies by saying that it was impossible to duplicate the flag movement here on Earth by trotting by a flag at about a forty five degree angle.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-apollo-15-flag.438617/page-2#post-1065710796

    You're unfit to analyze these things. All the viewers have seen you're lameness so there's really no point in talking to you.
     
  16. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    33,619
    Likes Received:
    7,784
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
     
  17. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Hey Durandel...

    Tell us whether you agree with Betamax. He says it's impossible to duplicate the flag movement here on Earth. Also, tell us whether you agree with Jay Windly's analysis of the dust-free sand issue (post #57).

    Shane Killian knows the Apollo missions were hoaxed as well as the hoax-believers do.

    MoonFaker: Flagging The Dead Horses. PART 4
     
  18. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    No it did not and your desperate need to spam this over and over is painful.

    You always avoid things:-

    If your proof that the Moon landings were hoaxed is a small snippet of video from one mission where you think it behaves like air, where it also behaves like a number of other things and subsequent bodily contact, then you are deluding yourself once again. From a purely scientific standpoint, if you were 100% successful in showing that a flag behaves exactly that way, all you have done is proved that a tiny fragment of isolated video COULD have been faked. Hardly conclusive now is it? 382kg of lunar samples, that's conclusive even if that was all there were. But there are copious scientific reports, video, transcripts, photographs and third party evidence. What can hoax claimants do with the real evidence? Bluff at showing how maybe small segments of it could have been done, but offering no direct proof of that.

    There are none. You have no credibility, would get laughed at before you even entered the debate hall and you make the Black Knight look like superman.

    Your entire wall of spam debunked:-

    http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/

    Repeating your erroneous spam doesn't suddenly make it correct.

    I made a video and it proved you wrong, your just butt hurt that you got your ass whooped. Your response is where you claim that 45 degrees is more likely to be hit by the magical wall of air than side on to it.

    Spamming the same comment in the same post now.

    There are no viewers who support you. I would not notice you stop responding, you never address what is requested.

    Once again, you posted two videos, from each one, select anything not already debunked.
     
  19. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
  20. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The problem here is that you aren't fit to judge who is fit.

    Deliberately attempting to incur the actions of the moderators. I have a throwaway userid to read your lies on the spursforum site. Once again you spam this same bullshit whereby you claim the astronauts are slowed down to account for the ridiculous "flag in the water" claim. There is no billowing of the fabric and it moves unrestricted. It takes a high degree of ignorance to claim that is in water. Your "bubble" is a misshapen piece of ice, rotating and becoming many times larger as it moves towards the camera. It has been proven to all but the terminally fixated.

    You are a busted flush. I have no idea what you are even doing or think you are doing. It's all so embarrassingly bizarre - you are impervious to ass whooping. You completely ignored that evidence when it was presented the 20th time.
     
  21. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What's up Cosmo? Is this really so difficult?

    The reality is that you know, every single item in those repackaged spam films has been addressed and debunked.
     
  22. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Do you mean the way you debunked the hoax-believers' explanations for the flag anomaly* by saying it was impossible to duplicate the flag movement here on earth by running by it?
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-apollo-15-flag.438617/page-2#post-1065710796

    Or by agreeing with Jay Windley's** lame analysis of the dust-free sand issue?
    http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8135606&postcount=7907
    http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15

    Or what I pointed out in post #69?


    You've tried to obfuscate some anomalies that were simply too clear to obfuscate and looked silly. The only thing for me to do now is keep you from burying the posts in which you made yourself look silly. You can pretend all you want; you're all washed up.

    People can look at the amomalies and decide for themselves. The summaries I've posted here have a lot of dead links so here's another.
    https://www.giraffeboards.com/showthread.php?t=31034



    *
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-move-so-it-was-obviously-in-a-studio.362999/

    **
    http://www.clavius.org/about.html
     
  23. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Amongst other reasons given, with numerous videos. That is a good example yes. But the point is that you denied that every point in your repackaged spam hadn't been addressed. That was a lie.

    It wasn't lame and it has been further addressed in the thread you got another ass whooping in.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-dust-free-sand-strawman-claim.443515/

    That would be the flag moving unrestricted in water and the bubble that is obvious not. Yeah, that works too, you got ass whooped.

    Nothing you type is original - just cut and paste spam. Every single response. You fail as a truther so badly, you are an embarrassment.

    By spamming them again and making the same phoney claims again.

    I pity you.

    Other forum spam.

    All addressed here:-
    http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/
     
  24. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Now, I asked you quite clearly to offer one piece of evidence, not debunked, from each video. If you are here to debate, post them.

    What's up Cosmo? Is this really so difficult? The reality is that you know, every single item in those repackaged spam films has been addressed and debunked.
     
  25. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    148
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The Black Knight will never leave no matter how obvious it is that he lost.
    (see post #62)
     

Share This Page