The nuclear theory is refined, confirmed

Discussion in '9/11' started by Eleuthera, Sep 4, 2019.

  1. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    7,847
    Likes Received:
    2,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So a tiny nuke buried in the ground knocked down two buildings from the top down and the location of the crater you think the nuke was buried in is irrelevant? That's some top notch truther sleuthing. Very science. Much woke.
     
    bigfella likes this.
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,105
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Im not even going to dignify that level of bullshit spin with a response, just scorn :icon_shithappens:.
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2020
  3. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    7,847
    Likes Received:
    2,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's a statement that you don't make in public. That is, if you actually mean it you don't make it in public. If you mean it, you make it in your head; to yourself. I demonstrated this in practice by avoiding this section of the forum for years.

    When you say it in public, however, it means something different. It means: I can't think of an expedient response that refutes the way you contradicted the things I have said previously. Rather than put in any effort that might risk a situation where I have to change my mind, I'll just hand wave and preserve my previous conclusion. This is because what you did actually was a response. It's a statement that is self contradicting. It's the "I know you are but what am I" strategy of a debater who knows he will be unable to win the debate.
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,105
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    what a crock of MORE bullshit spin.
    It means bullshit spin
    It could also mean trolling
    Dont try to bluff me fang, nothing changes your opinion. If facts changed your opinion you would not be capable of tooting the OCT mantra.

    The facts are that we found substantially increased levels of elements in the area after 911 that can only be caused by a nuclear event.

    When a country puts up the iron curtain, its not necessary to describe design details of precisely what was used, as you demand, which is a false premise, only the existence of its foot print.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2020
  5. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    7,847
    Likes Received:
    2,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Well when you come at me with claim like: A crater was found directly under the collapsed towers (it wasn't) that was created by a mini nuke (it wasn't) that contained increased levels of elements that can only be caused by a nuclear event (it didn't) how is that supposed to change my mind?
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,105
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That as usual is only partly true, your incorrect interpretation, and I dont care if you change your mind, there are many people who are unconvincible regardless of the facts. I seen an ariel view that was once upon a time out there before the sweeping/sanitization crews came around that I can no longer find, and frankly I dont give a **** enough to spend the time digging for it.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2020
  7. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    18,911
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL

    Bob... thats all you do, is disrespect other posters. In. Every. Single. Post.

    What a joke.
     
  8. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    18,911
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And... then avoid every hole in every conclusion you have drawn...

    The truthers on this site need to work on their debating skills.
     
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,959
    Likes Received:
    1,440
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Says the "fruit loop" and "conspiracy wacko" guy.
     
    Kokomojojo likes this.
  10. jcarlilesiu

    jcarlilesiu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    18,911
    Likes Received:
    4,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Point in case.
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,105
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeh we should all adopt your posting style, say nothing substantial about the subject matter and piss moan and complain that other members reject your unending personal attacks.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  12. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,105
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    case in point not point in case, duh!
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,105
    Likes Received:
    787
    Trophy Points:
    113
    case in point!
     
  14. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    11,344
    Likes Received:
    4,688
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Educate yourself if you're really curious.

    https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm
     
  15. bigfella

    bigfella Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    3,547
    Likes Received:
    2,724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So that is your 'evidence'? A series of unsubstantiated rumours.

    Still waiting for you to answer those basic questions a few pages back. You know you can't, so i guess it is either ignore me or insult me. Either proves my point.
     
  16. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    11,344
    Likes Received:
    4,688
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh there is plenty of evidence for the nuclear theory, but one must be honest, perceptive and curious to see it.

    If you are aware that there was horizontal displacement of massive pieces, you would understand that gravity alone was not responsible for the damage observed. Explosives of some sort were required.

    If you are aware of the work done by Gordon Ross and Craig Furlong many years ago, you would understand that there were massive explosions there that day. Ross and Furlong many years ago analyzed the seismic records in the area. You won't like what they found.

    If you are aware of the strangely burned vehicles on the streets, and if you are curious, you would ask yourself "how could gravity do that?"

    And if you're curious and honest, you will watch what a German nuclear physicist has to say about it.

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/09/01/breathtaking-solving-nuclear-9-11-the-pommer-report/
     
  17. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,243
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    getting past the videos and psychological babble ... nice flawed freshman science project on how things could have been done ... that whole scenario would have taken more work than conventional explosives ... we went from nanotubes to high rise tubes??? ...

    not to mention that in Step 1, he doesn't even know what EMP is ... if I was a generous professor, I would give him a C for a dazzling effort ...
     
  18. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    11,344
    Likes Received:
    4,688
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure, Shinebox, whatever you say.
     

Share This Page