The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

Duh.

By you? Sure Sherlock, you haven't proven anything other than that you wish to remain ignorant about 9/11 and you trust a pathologically lying entity by your own admission.

Where? From you? After conducting over 14 years of research on a near daily basis I'm quite capable of finding 9/11 information without the help of an anonymous pathological denier and OCT groveler, thanks anyway.

You mean the one you never knew existed and you keep asking me for a link that I already posted several times?

And the above is a perfect sample of your desire to remain ignorant about 9/11. Those videos try to prove in detail that a large airliner did indeed impact the Pentagon on 9/11, it should be right up your alley but again, you're only interested in your own beliefs not in doing any research. No one has to believe anything they read or view in any video, but to fail to do research in lieu of just spewing your own beliefs is incredibly pathetic and telling. You keep reinforcing your desire to remain ignorant, yet you have the audacity to claim you've proven something other than your own ignorance.

 

obviously you are not capable, I told you where you could get the info.
Now you are calling an A&P who you never spoke with, a pathological liar.
You are claiming info exists in a manual you never read.

As I said, you don't want the info, that could ruin your fantasy.

They told us in sales, Never proceed past a negative answer.
You have two, right out of the gate.
You're trying to sweep them under the rug, and move on under false pretenses.

 

So you're trying to sell me. Yeah thanks, I have a bridge for you too.

 

Excellent set of vids ... the best I have seen ... I await comments from the truthers here ...

 

just watch the vids ... it proves conclusively that a 757 hit the Pentagon with no evidence that any other scenario is plausible ... it's a very good evidence based set that also invalidates such vids as "Loose Change" ... "In Plane Sight" ... "The New Pearl Harbor" ... and numerous others ...

I'm surprised that David Chandler narrated the series ... he must be coming to his senses ...

 

I've only gone through the first 4 but I agree so far.

I listen to comments from posters no matter what childish label you want to assign to them. I'd rather hold off my comments until I've reviewed all 20 videos.

He has alway displayed brilliance and expertise. I was highly impressed when he embarrassed the crap out of Shyam Sunder and John Gross. So what makes you think everything else he says is not sensible? Just because you disagree?

 

let me know when you finish the vids ... perhaps at that point we can address all the BS concerning the Pentagon being spouted by uninformed truthers ...

 

When are you going to address all the BS concerning 9/11 that’s being shoveled down your throat by NIST and the 9/11 Commission? At the end of the day that’s what really matters not all the alternate theories out there. It’s also what is important to me personally. Once people come to terms with and acknowledge they’ve been scammed big time by the US government and its puppet media, then perhaps Americans can move forward with a real investigation into 9/11. Then and only then perhaps we can all find out what really happened instead of sitting around and analyzing theories and hoping one might fit.

For me it’s obvious you’re only interested in discussing what you believe supports the OCT and ridiculing anything that might question or contradict it.

Even without going through all these videos I’ve acknowledged that it is possible (though improbable) that a large commercial airliner might have impacted the Pentagon. But there is no incontrovertible proof. All of what’s being presented by the videos only point to the possibility not the proof. And even if it’s true, there are many, many issues that are still unresolved. For example, there is no proof that it was AA77 as claimed and there is no proof of who or what flew such an alleged airplane. Then there’s the serious problem of a deliberate coverup (i.e. no parts match and no physical identification of the FDRs and CVRs). But those are only the tip of the iceberg. There’s so much more that makes no sense or brings the OCT into question. It’s not just a couple of issues, it’s literally hundreds of issues.

 

BS, there is proof who flew the plane.
There is proof of what plane it was.

You keep bringing up the same crap that is wrong.

Your entire theory starts with false information, allowing you to go anywhere.

 

While it still seems the Deep State might just be all those Pennsylvania pedophilia priests holdover business that brought 9/11 to the US from back in the 1970's Bicentennial more perfect union of "serve the Pope or die" lynching enforcement that attacked a Navy Hospital about 25 years prior to 9/11 as those Arab terrorists that threatened POTUS & to nuke Temple Mount before 9/11 in Florida who in all probability could have been training to fly planes Islam flying carpet style might just be the paper airplane novices.

​

 

What’s false is your faith based belief that there is proof of who flew the plane and what plane it was. What’s also false is your claim that I have a theory. What’s also false is that I post false information.

It’s you who keeps inventing crap based on your faithful devotion to the OCT.

 

That's childish.

They knew what plane it was before it hit the building. It was hijacked.
They recovered bodies, plane parts.
There was no question what plane hit the building.

Are you claiming in mid-air, they took all the people off the plane, put them on another plane of the same type, and crashed that one.

Do you have any idea just how insane that is.

 

Children are too immature to have the mental capacity to question fairy tales. So they trust adults and accept what they’re told on faith. You claim to be 69 years old on your profile, if that’s true you should know better.

And the above is a perfect example. You keep repeating what you’ve been fed hoping it’s true. Fortunately I don’t share your trusting mentality I require incontrovertible proof for every detail. And I know there is none to be had. Perhaps some of it is true but there’s far too much that’s just not for real. Lies are not just plain lies they’re also partial truths along with omissions manufactured to give the illusion of truth.

Just as insane as your desperation. Making up stupidity and trying to pretend that’s what I believe. It’s the same idiocy you try to pretend I claim about “thousands” being in on it.

My objective is not to invent theory it’s strictly to expose the OCT for the fraud it is and to try to show why it’s a scam and an impossible fairy tale open to hundreds or thousands of questions. By the same token to also expose the criminals who covered up 9/11 and fed us these ridiculous fairy tales made for children.

Like I said, you’re desperate to try to convince me as evidenced by your posts. I don’t care what you believe, I use posters like you to expose the reality and extent of the scam to those who don’t know and want to know. If after exposing the facts one still believes the OCT is true then so be it. I’m not interested in convincing them otherwise.

 

Well then, make it clear what you do claim, and not a page long rant.
One claim at a time.

 

There’s no “rant” and it’s as clear as day even you understood it despite your pretense. If it’s too long for you then YOU have a serious attention deficit problem.

 

Sorry dude, smothering the rant with too many points to address is a common copout.
Start from the beginning one at a time.
You can't address it this way because everything you post, has been proven false. You rather post 10 things so when someone contest one, you can easily switch to another.
You have yet to answer one single question in your rants, and that is what you are trying to avoid.

 

Sorry dude, the above is worthless drivel, not interested.

 

Of course you're not interested, I believe I told you that long ago.

If you have to answer up to your claims, your whole theory evaporates

 

And I agree, you are not interesting at all, at this point you're trying to go around in circles. Was there something you didn't understand about having an adult, intelligent discussion? Yours isn't one of those, it doesn't reach the level of grade school. Are you even capable of such a discussion? You keep demonstrating you have a difficult time remaining adult and intelligent. You are only embarrassing yourself with your incessant red herrings and ad hominems.

You mean YOUR fabricated theories. The ones about "thousands" being involved and this equally idiot one?:

This topic is still about the Pentagon on 9/11, it hasn't changed, you're trolling as usual. You've already had your posts deleted by the mods, that should have told you something, maybe not.

If you can't/won't post anything adult and intelligent you leave me no other option than to ignore your posts. I posted something you claim is too long for you to digest. So my suggestion is for you to go back and read it one sentence at a time and use a dictionary if necessary. I will not repeat what I post because you can't absorb it for its length.

Sorry if this post is also too long for you, try the same suggested exercise with this one as well. Good luck.

 

My fabricated theory,
Sorry, I have no major theory, other than what was reported.

Your claim of something else hitting the building would take thousands of people to pull off.

Naturally you won't address this,

You'll just rant about something else.

 

I wonder where the no planers are ...

 

I am up to Chapter 4. To be sure, Coste is the author and Chandler is the narrator but I assume he agrees with Coste.

I don't want to get into the remaining videos yet but what do you feel "sucked" about the preface?

 

I didn't time stamp it, but at somewhere late in the series, Chandler agreed that Coste had made him questions his own views regarding the Pentagon ...

On second thought, maybe the preface was good ... you can't dismiss good science, no matter if it doesn't agree with your views, and/or biases ...

the woman (can't recall her name) was like nails on a chalkboard ... why she was even included in the vid series puzzles me ...

 

LOLOLOL

Sorry Bob, you're still using your own defensive mechanism.
The posts are not too long for me to read and understand, I understand them all to well.

The posts are too long and mixed up to pinpoint any one statement.
It gives you an out, so you don't have to address something you are questioned about.

 

Ah, a breath of fresh air. Once in a while you can participate in an intelligent adult discussion about 9/11 (no use of your silly "troofer" term). It would be better if you kept that up in all discussions, but it is what it is. Anyway:

Agree 100% and I have noted from your posts that you don't believe the NIST investigation into WTC7 was good science. Their conclusion however is the officially accepted explanation as to what happened to the 3 towers on 9/11. If it's not based on good science, I don't understand why you go along with it though and even defend it on multiple occasions, that's quite baffling.

The woman's name is Lynn Margulis and she highlights some excellent points about science in general (see at 3:20 in the preface). I don't understand why you're puzzled by her brief inclusion in the series if you truly believe in good science. Can you explain?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_Margulis