The Pentagon on 9/11

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Nov 1, 2016.

  1. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,230
    Likes Received:
    909
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes thanks, I'm fully aware that G forces have a contributing effect on air speed to more likely precipitate a breakup. I don't need to be a pilot to know that, it's elementary physics. Like I said, I don't know if the plane should have broken up or not, it was merely one of thousands of question about the official narrative. That question actually should have been answered by the manufacturer but the manufacturer was never asked by any official investigation, like thousands of other questions that were never researched by any official investigation. There is no NTSB report and no FBI report, it's all CLASSIFIED because knowing the answers would "jeopardize our safety", we could all die a horrible death.

    As stated, I ask questions about the official narrative, those who bought it ask questions of the questioners and ask no questions about the official narrative. Worse, some of them are incessant apologists, believe they have every single answer even though the narrative is demonstrably whole cloth and even stoop down to the level of ridiculing the questioners.

    You haven't got a single clue, you're just regurgitating what you believe is true from out of that whole cloth. I'm not that easy. Unless and until they forensically and meticulously identify every single piece of physical debris allegedly recovered at the Pentagon (that can be identified) and produce a detailed report that conclusively matches all those identifiable pieces to AA77, there is NO conclusive evidence that AA77 was anywhere near the Pentagon at any time on 9/11/01. Accepting anything on faith from a proven pathological lying entity known as the US government is just not within the scope of anything that I would call intelligent. In fact, my position always begins with they're lying, because that's what they nearly ALWAYS do for every major event.

    I agree with this guy (RIP).

     
  2. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    1,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's in an old-fashioned book, and I know you well enough to know you are NOT INTERESTED. The truth scares you.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  3. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    1,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We've been through this before Gam. You require a link for your world to exist, while I understand that knowledge can be gained and facts learned by other means.

    We know each other Gam. When you get a link that proves you wrong on any given issue, you deny the facts and the truth. After months, it becomes predictable and boring.

    In the end, it doesn't matter a bit where there were AAM at the WH that day or not. It was an inside job all the way. You embrace an impossible story, I reject it.

    17 years later you still have not realized how we were all fooled. I would be embarrassed to admit that in public.
     
  4. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Some questions for you Scott.

    I marked up the "depthcheck" image from the site linked above.

    1. Why do the author's red perspective lines all of a sudden take a dip downward at the part of the building that juts out? The yellow lines are straight lines matching the roofline up to the part the juts out. All of the other red lines are straight. If he adjusted for the distortion of the lens, why are only the two lines affected on the building?

    2. Why is the tail of the plane the author uses at such a steep angle? It matches the angle of a plane viewed directly from the side shown above it.

    3. Why does the author's plane match the length of the plane viewed directly from the side (shown above it). If it truly matched the angle of the plane's trajectory, it would be foreshortened like the image of the plane I added below the author's plane.

    depthcheck (2).jpg
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2018
  5. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    No, I require proof, not some lame excuse that "I can't provide any proof, you just have to believe. The real world requires proof when someone makes a claim that is in doubt. What world do you live in? You live in a world where claims can be made and you just believe them without any supporting evidence?

    That's the most idiotic thing I've ever heard.

    Go peddle your "fantasy world" views somewhere else.
     
  6. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    And evidence to support your claims scares YOU.
     
  7. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    1,230
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It was time to move on a long time ago Gam. The so-called debate ended years ago with the report from the commission set up to fail. It was an inside job all the way.

    You pretend that links prove something. Yes, of course they sometimes can, but the big picture has been clear for many years now--the official story is impossible.

    You're making a big deal about whether or not there were AAM at the White House, but the proverbial horse left the proverbial barn years ago. The official story is utterly bankrupt. The findings of the 911 Commission are as bogus as the findings of the Warren Commission.
     
  8. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Wrong.

    It's not just because it exceeded VMO.Try doing a little more research before making idiotic statements like this.
     
  9. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    ANY information. You've provided nothing but fantasy claims with no supporting evidence whatsoever. Continue to live in your fantasy world.
     
  10. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The "picture is clear".

    :roflol:

    That's why you and your truther brethren can't come together as one and agree on exactly happened. everyone supposedly has "scientific" proof as to what they think:

    Thermite
    Explosives
    Missiles
    Holograms
    Nukes
    Energy Weapons

    Yeah, you keep living the fantasy that the picture is clear. At least I've stuck with the only explanation that makes any sense.

    No wonder you can't provide proof of your claims. It simply doesn't exist.
     
  11. Gamolon

    Gamolon Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,757
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2018
  12. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,230
    Likes Received:
    909
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you.
     
  13. Shinebox

    Shinebox Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    795
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    18
    “The conspiracy theory offers the chance of hidden, important, and immediate knowledge, so that the believer can become an expert, possessed of a knowledge not held even by the so-called experts.”
     
  14. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,230
    Likes Received:
    909
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The official conspiracy theory offers the chance of hidden, important, and immediate knowledge, so that the believer can become an expert, possessed of a knowledge not held even by the so-called experts.
     
  15. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    2,263
    Likes Received:
    395
    Trophy Points:
    83

    LOLOLOL

    Scot.

    There were 137, witnesses that were documented saying a plane hit the building.
    Overkill at the least.

    There were thousands who saw it.

    None said there was a flyover, that I am aware of.
     
  16. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    2,263
    Likes Received:
    395
    Trophy Points:
    83
    so they planted tons of airplane parts, mixed in some dead bodies, that just happened to be at the airport buying tickets, on the grounds, and in the building, and nobody saw them do it.
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2018
  17. Shinebox

    Shinebox Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    795
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    18
    well ... that's the theory ...
     
  18. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    2,263
    Likes Received:
    395
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Wish I had some Brooklyn bridges.
     
  19. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    5,230
    Likes Received:
    909
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well please contact me I will sell you one cheap.
     
  20. yasureoktoo

    yasureoktoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    2,263
    Likes Received:
    395
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I'm sure you bought plenty.
     

Share This Page