You don't seem to care for structural engineers or physics experts. So who would you like to take up your case?
Wrong yet again. The square cube law states that for every doubling in size of a model, the mass cubes. So if you double the size of your model from 1'X1'X5' to 2'X2'X10' and the weight is 10 pounds, the weight cubes to 1000pounds. The other thing you ignore is the fact that the smaller the model, the harder it is to model the structures. You've given up on that entirely and use a solid ring of paper to "simulate" the structures in the towers. In other words, the only thing your model proves is how moronic your claims are that it proves the towers couldn't have collapsed. The only one who will be laughed at for the next thousand years are the truthtards. Currently we have one truthtard claiming he knows the "truth", yet every other university and engineering society and government agency in charge of standards is too stupid to continue operating because they don't see what YOU claim is the truth. I don't think so. It isn't that they are stupid. It is that they can't lower themselves to your level of stupidity to think a retarded toy actually models the towers. According to your retarded paradigm, they should give up computer modeling and accurate scale modeling for office supplies.
Plain old ordinary people comprehending some GRADE SCHOOL PHYSICS for themselves. You expect people to need AUTHORITY to tell them what to think. When the Parthenon was built how many PhDs in physics and structural engineering were there? When the Colosseum was built how many PhDs in physics and structural engineering were there? Skyscrapers became possible when cheap steel production began in the 1880s. Regardless of all of the mildly complicated details this problem still involves stacking masses on top of each other. The 1st level of the WTC had to be strong enough to support 109 levels. The 2nd level of the WTC had to be strong enough to support 108 levels. The 3rd level of the WTC had to be strong enough to support 107 levels. Etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., for 106 levels. In 2000 I would not have expected a PhD physicist to be able to specify the density of iron or steel off the top of his head. I would expect it from a structural engineer. I would not have expected a physicist to give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about skyscrapers. But I would expect a physicist to be able to figure out instantly that the distribution of steel is important to the design of a skyscraper. Therefore both physicists and structural engineers should know AND ADMIT that the information is important to analyzing any supposed collapse of a skyscraper. But any high school student that passed a course in physics should understand it also. In fact I would expect grade school kids that played with erector sets to figure it out. The PRETENSE that this is a complicated problem that only people with degrees in the area of specialization can understand is UTTER BULL(*)(*)(*)(*)! So any grade school kids should be able to build my model and comprehend the significance of expending energy from the falling mass to crush loops. 9/11 is a JOKE! The experts should have resolved this and told THE WORLD within SIX MONTHS that airliners could not accomplish that much destruction in that little time. The fact that they haven't means they have painted themselves into a corner by not doing so. How can they now come out and say that knowing the distributions of steel and concrete are necessary to settle the issue? But after NINE YEARS we don't have the data and the experts don't mention the subject. Very convenient! Now my model is QUITE SIMPLE. The paper washers are obviously comparable to the steel columns. They don't have much weight but I do have to make them stronger toward the bottom in 3 different regions. That is like columns getting thicker to be stronger toward the bottom of a skyscraper. My washers provide the mass that must be supported and be accelerated and provide inertia to slow the falling mass. But the paper loops must be crushed in order for the mass to come down. The people trying to say my model is too different from the WTC are merely laughable. They think rhetoric and bull(*)(*)(*)(*) are more important than physics. The physicists and structural engineers have to explain why they let this crap drag on for NINE YEARS. This is no longer about physics. The talk of physics is just to obfuscate the issues and confuse the ignorant. This is about the psychology of keeping people ignorant and believing that a simple problem is so complicated that they should TRUST the experts even when the experts are talking obvious bull(*)(*)(*)(*). psik [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wc0YISlMoQQ"]YouTube - Better Bad News - WTC7 and Forbidden Questions[/ame] PS - So where is the table specifying the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE that were on every level of the towers and why haven't the experts been discussing it as long as this nonsense has been unresolved?
OMG! You really know how to advertise the fact that you are an idiot, don't you? The weight doesn't cube THE VOLUME CUBES. Doubling the length, width and height would be 2 x 2 x 2 which is a factor of EIGHT TIMES. The weight of washers is 3.5 pounds so the result would come to 28 pounds. And YOU complained about my not doing mathematics. You are so good at it. ROFLMAO psik
Taking bets on how long, if ever @PatriotBoy911 admits that his mathematics and reasoning were once again, total buffoonery...The over under is 45hrs....I'll take the over... Cheers
The Underlying Politics of 9/11: This proves beyond a doubt that a carefully contrived False-Flag event was staged by elements within the US government on 9/11. Ralph Schoenman discusses some 9/11 oddities [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYgB99n8zgI&feature=feedf"]YouTube - The Underlying Politics of 9/11[/ame]
You are right and I am wrong. When I am wrong, I admit it. I wonder if you will do the same? Better definition of square cube law and why scale models don't work when describing large scale events
That is an excellent video, thanks for posting. All of you naysayers should take a long look and listen to Ralph Schoenman's documentary regarding the "Underlying Politics Of 9/11".... [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYgB99n8zgI&feature=feedf"]YouTube - The Underlying Politics of 9/11[/ame]
Flight 75 hit the WTC? Epic fail early on. Amusing and useless video. Although I do especially like the comical part about how the Mossad supposedly killed Atta...with the help of "american pilots". Like there would have been an air strike to kill a single man and oh yeah, Mossad needs absolutely no help to take out anybody on earth; ask the guys who organized Munich if you like--you'll need a Seance to reach most of them. Had the Gerries let the Mossad take care of stuff at the Olympic village there wouldn't have been anything left of the 3 that survived. Thanks for posting it; it shows how desperate the "movement"--that can't even get the flight numbers right--truly is. Epic fail in all respects.
You can CLAIM they don't work, I merely admit they are difficult. My model is not accurate to scale to the WTC. I never claimed it was. And I didn't try to make it to scale. I said it was AS WEAK as I could make it. We are talking about whether or not a COMPLETE COLLAPSE can occur not whether 20 or 30 or 40 or 50 stories of the north tower should have been crushed by the falling top portion. That is why our engineering schools have made such fools of themselves. At the very least most of them are remaining silent on what is obviously impossible. And they don't even demand accurate data on the distributions of steel and concrete. I bet at least 60 stories of the north tower should have still been standing even if a collapse started. It is the tilt and rotation of the south tower that is ridiculous, and ONE HOUR after impact to the 81st floor when there had to be enough steel there to hold 29 stories? The US should be laughed at for expecting people to believe this crap. psik
So if someone could make it weaker, would that then convince you of anything? Or would you continue to believe the complete collapse couldn't happen? No, this is where YOU have made such a fool of yourself. Just because you are not intelligent enough to understand the collapse because your retarded toy convinced you it was impossible doesn't mean it is impossible. The ONLY thing your toy proves is that your toy isn't capable of complete collapse. And you would lose that bet. So structural failure is simply beyond your comprehension? No, anyone who believes your crap should be laughed at.
You have the NERVE to talk about comprehension! You cubed the MASS instead of the Volume for the square-cube law. You are trying to pass that off as an error in math but you demonstrated a complete LACK OF COMPREHENSION of the subject. You have demonstrated that you are an IDIOT that just comes in here throwing rhetorical bull(*)(*)(*)(*) at anyone that disagrees with your brainless position. The Laws of Physics don't give a d(*)(*)(*) about patriotism. The laws of physics don't give a d(*)(*)(*) about religion. The plutonium that was dropped on Nagasaki didn't give a d(*)(*)(*) how many people would die or who would win the war. Inanimate matter and energy are incapable of giving a (*)(*)(*)(*) about anything. The trouble with my model is that grade school kids can understand it and it shows that physicists are either idiots or liars. What is going on in the politics of our engineering schools that keeps this grade school BS from being resolved? This 9/11 business is now nothing but psychological BS. All of the people claiming to know physics that haven't been pointing out the importance of the distributions of steel and concrete for the last NINE YEARS have been talking bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Pretending that simple stuff is complicated to impress the ignorant and make sure they stay that way. 9/11 is the Piltdown Man incident of the 21st century. psik
You don't even know what I did. If you cube the mass and the density and substance remain the same, you've also cubed the volume. Try to keep up. A Greek by the name of Archimedes figured that one out thousands of years ago. What I did was instead of cubing the multiplier, I cubed the weight. At least when I make a mistake I know what the mistake was! That's pretty hilarious coming from someone who just demonstrated a complete lack of comprehension on the subject. Nice ad hominem, but basically just you whining. So why don't you follow the laws of physics and quit your braindead bull(*)(*)(*)(*) with your retarded toys? Your toy does not model the WTC in any way, shape or form. It isn't correct in dimensions. It isn't correct in construction. It isn't correct in mass. Yet because you managed to build a retarded toy you can't get to collapse, you think nothing else can collapse, especially the towers. Now THAT is retarded!!!! OR you're able to convince grade school kids who don't know any better that you actually know what you're talking about while the physicists sit there laughing at your ignorance. Your paranoid delusions and ego make you think everyone else is ignoring what you're pretending to have discovered. Wake up and smell the coffee!!! When experts look at the problem and proclaim that the collapse was not only possible but unavoidable after the initial event and then you, some pissant with no experience and a retarded toy come along and pretend to know more than every other physicist in the world.... well, hate to break it to you, but your credibility isn't enough to warrant believing you about the weather, much less about physics. Says the guy who can't even get the physics right and thinks a retarded toy accurately models the collapse dynamics of a 110 story building even though it is not the same in anything other than having levels. Really? You can't even tell us why those figures are needed, much less demonstrate mathimatically how the collapse was impossible. Pretending the numbers of your (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up retarded toy mean anything only shows the depth of the egotism and ignorance.
You don't understand the relationship between the numbers and reality. You are just spewing out drivel that you think sounds intelligent. If you cube the mass and the DENSITY then the volume should remain constant. That is what density is mass/volume. You would end up with a lot more mass in the same volume. Do come up with another hilarious mistake and show people that they should not pay attention to what you say about the WTC because you have no comprehension of what you are talking about. psik
Learn how to read English. If you cube the mass........ and the density and substance remain the same, you've also cubed the volume. I should have known such a simple concept was beyond your grasp. Every time you try and point out my mistakes, you end up making an even bigger mistake. HI LA RI OUS!!!!! Truthtards prove day in and day out why they are the laughing stock of everyone including other conspiracy groups.
Learn how to write English. When you string ands together there is no way to tell how you mean it. psik
Two seconds worth of thought and you would have had it.... unless, of course, you want to be dishonest and just take it the wrong way to be an ass.
Please don't forget Israel has thousands of paid agents monitoring 911 conspiracy sites pretending to be debunkers, but in truth they are disinformation agents doing everything they can to disrupt the truth from getting out, and it's a on going organized effort by the masters of deception. Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9/11: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw&feature=related"]YouTube - Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9/11[/ame] Mossad Truck Bombs on Sept 11:[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aKj6uJ5Mt4&feature=related"]YouTube - Mossad Truck Bombs on Sept 11[/ame] Israeli intelligence operatives watched and made video recordings of the 9-11 attacks as they happened. Positioned at a safe distance from the twin towers of the World Trade Centre, five Mossad agents were caught filming the whole episode. http://www.illuminati-news.com/9-11-filmed.htm By now all reasonable people in the world know that the zionist controled Bush administration used 9/11 as a pretense to invade and occupy an oil-rich Middle Eastern country that posed no threat to America. Even President Bush has admitted in a press conference that there were never any WMDs in Iraq. http://whatreallyhappened.com/category/911?page=2
More bull(*)(*)(*)(*) from the truthtard who actually believes Dan Rather got everything right on 9/11..... like the car bomb going off in front of the Capital building. We realize you are alergic to the truth and are paranoid to the point you think anyone who would dare question your hate filled anti-Jew rhetoric MUST be working for Israel. It is really sad. I hope some day you wake up to discover white supremicist bull(*)(*)(*)(*) is just that; really ugly bull(*)(*)(*)(*). You make me ashamed to be white.
I've been gone for months, and I see the same old folks in here with their same ole tired defensive line. But no explanation to the fall of those "47 central support columns". Until that issue is addressed, satisfactory, the rest is just a smoke screen.
And how many seconds of thought would have prevented this: The question really is how ANYBODY could have thought it. Cubing weight? Volume cubes because the three different lengths are perpendicular to each other so the multiplication makes sense in relation to the units. psik
blahblah: More bull(*)(*)(*)(*) from the govtard attacking the messenger with the same ole played out, your a antisemitic racist...but you still haven't answered any of these question. Why is that? You just divert,attack, and disrupt just like a disinformation agent. Is it NOT true that Jews control the "Fed"? Do they NOT have a monopoly over the media? Are the spies who gave up all of our secrets NOT Jewish? Have Jews NOT been expelled 109 times? Are you NOT seeing the clear pattern of behavior here? 911, Iraq, PNAC , All roads lead to Israel http://www.bushstole04.com/911/all_roads_israel.htm
