Theory of Intelligent Design

I know that Christians before and during the reformation followed the old laws. They killed gays. Blasphemers. Witches. False prophets. Fortunetellers. Etc. As they should have. After all, this was what jesus said.


We know that everything will not be accomplished until the final battle. The end of days. Since it's not the end of days and jesus hasn't come back to earth yet, we can conclude the "everything" has not been accomplished. He has not come to abolish the laws. Nor has he come to abolish prophets. He has come to fulfill the laws which brought about his comming. And the prophecies that prophesied his comming.

This practice of thinking that Peters words are worth more than jesus is a recent one

Let's look at some of the old laws which Christians followed during the dark ages.

And there is way more. If they call for killing for the son of sinners, I wonder what happened to the sinners themselves? That's not even going into sheer massacres and genocide that god directed.


Like I said. You would have actual credibility in an actual debate if you weren't such an ignorant liar that I pointed you out to be. Calling people the devil when they present to you facts that you do not like. Then lying about getting those fact and the things you said.

That's why talking about irrelevant things
in your failed ad hominem attempt is the best you could hope for when you have no supporting evidence to debate with. I shd typ lk ds jst cuz I can. Im shr yd lk it

 

I have traveled around he country and have run into people with your mentality, they are usually from Mississippi or Alabaman and their minds have been infected with christian fundamentalism, he furthest one can get from education or any type of logic

 

I have traveled the world, and taken family members with me on many occasions. Your petty generalities and personal attacks are so typical of the Left as to be meaningless. They are all you have left. You don't recite any science, you just proclaim yourself to be scholarly when you clearly are not. The pretense that geography determines intelligence or education is hateful and ignorant.
What a waste of time it is for anyone to read anything you write.

Guno goes on my Ignore List now. Life is too short to bother with the likes of you.

~ciao

 

Nobody does...

...which of course means nobody has a comprehensive understanding of that either.

 

Douglas Axe has zero credibility.

 

Not come across any amphibian experiments either but I do know that scientists have done simple math experiments with mammals, birds and bees showing greater than chance outcomes in getting the answers right.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-animals-have-the-ability-to-count/

Our own ability to do calculus is just an extrapolation of basic math and I was part of an "experiment" in upper elementary school where we were all taught calculus. That does not mean that I was capable of solving the complexities of the universe but that the ability can be taught at an early age.

Interesting results in this experiment.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/04/monkeys-can-do-math

 

BZZZT WRONG!

Terrorists teach terrorism!

Islam teaches the same things as Christianity.

Gratuitous insult with no basis whatsoever!

Ironic!

BZZZT Wrong again!

Mainstream Christians have no problem with evolution.

Only fundamentalist Christians who take the "creation" in the bible LITERALLY erroneously feel "attacked" because they have taken an unreasonable position when it comes to dealing with reality.

Gotta love the irony coming from someone whining about about ad homs and ignorance!

 

Our entire modern world has been shaped by science. All of our technology, the discoveries which drive it's advancement; everything that we know was all shaped by science

But scince can't be our primary tool for knowing. It's like saying that a boat can never be your primary tool for sailing

 

Logic.

Since you are not an expert and you don't know, means that experts don't know

 

Oh yeh. Monkeys have a better memory than people

 

FallenWell-Known Member
New

• You are ignoring content by this member. Show Ignored Content

------------------------

Intelligent Design is not a "theory," but rather an inference.

 

ID is a nefarious attempt to bypass the 1st Amendment and force schools to teach "creation science".

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/21/education/judge-rejects-teaching-intelligent-design.html

It was exposed and debunked by a conservative federal judge appointed by President Bush.

 

Undeniable
How Biology Confirms Our Intuition That Life is Designed
by Douglas Axe

(Faith communities have a commitment to doctrine. The scientific community should have a commitment to discovery, but yields to doctrine.) Science boasts intellectual openness as its core value. But when openness gives way to dogma on any particular scientific claim, we’re left with something more like bad religion than good science. To spot one of these ugly examples, look for two telltale signs. The first is official denouncement of any idea that poses a threat to the dogma, and the second is a culture of disdain for that threatening idea. – p 217


“Natural selection may explain the survival of the fittest, but it cannot explain the arrival of the fittest.” – Dutch botanist Hugo DeVries – p 220


“present theory tacitly assumes the prior existence of the entities whose features it is meant to explain.” (The Arrival of the Fittest, by Fontana and Buss) – p 221

Truth is a bigger and more profound subject than science. – p 228

Because reality can’t ultimately be grounded in physical things, materialism always fails when we ask big questions of it. – p 231

… we place faith in the essential propositions undergirding science, which means science will never be the primary path to knowing, much less the only path to knowing. Faith has always been more fundamental to human knowledge than science, and this will never change. – p 232

 

Quotes without credible source links are utterly meaningless.