This guy wants to reduce his penis to 3 inches long

What does biological essentialism have to do with the source. The source wasn't expressing biological essentialism it was where the story came from.

Does the blaze offend you so much that you can't talk on any thread that even mentions it or references it or some of the reason that the topic you want to discuss?

 

I don't see how he's mentally competent he appears to be deranged.

I'm going to have to start using the blades as a source that's triggering the crap out of you people and it's hilarious.

 

I wouldn't say he's less of one he's only claiming to change his race which tends to be a lot less definable than sex.

There seems to be only one race that if you transition to the problem some of the time. I think it really all depends on if you have the right opinions.

Rachel Dalizal and that German lady they're problematic but Meghan Markle isn't.

 

Its his penis, so he can do whatever he wants with it.

 

Is race really that much less definable than gender?

I think many would disagree with you.

There are also many social progressives on the Left who would want to deny as much as possible any difference between males and females.

Is gender just a "social construct" too?
Many on the Left believe that.

 

Many people in this forum seem to want to avoid thinking about stories like this or its implications.

If this is a mental health issue, then it begs the question how is gender transition surgery not?

If they support transgenderism as such a great thing that should be affirmed in all cases, then, if they are to be logically consistent, they are forced to support this too. (Despite obviously being insanity and pretty pointless)

 

Many on the Left want government to pay for free "trans healthcare". In fact this has already started. (Look at the policy Biden instituted in the US military. And California is specifically giving grants to organizations that perform gender transition surgeries. The government NHS in the UK, where this guy lives, pays for trans healthcare)

Should we pay for this guy's transracial surgeries too?

 

Oh, its another gripe against "the left".

Your own article is titled "'Transracial' spends $250K to look Korean, touts penis reduction plan."

Its his dick, and his money, and he is not even American, so why are you complaining about it?

PS, If you respected the forum rules, you would have copied the above as the thread title and everyone would have known he is spending his own money.

 

I see, so you are avoiding answering the question and don't want to look at or think about this, or see the inconsistency.

So typical of many progressives. When something demonstrates logic isn't on your side, just ignore it.

Maybe we should teach little kids in school that a surgeon can turn them into an African race person, if they want? Or an Asian? Depending on their preference and how they "feel on the inside". How about insist that other people refer to you by your "African name" (Jason -->"Jamal") and even pass laws about that?

 

Oh, you are trying to make it about me now, with fake labels and all.

That's one way to deflect from a failed thread.

He is not spending your precious money.

Get it?

 

People like you want taxpayer money and resources spent on all this transgender stuff.
Why not him?

That's the point.

 

Show me where I have said that, or admit that you are a liar.

The guy in question is not even transgender, so what's the point of your lies? You're just making yourself look like an ass.

 

The Left wants this. Is it fair to say to say you vote for them?

Then you intentionally are going out of your way not to want to see the point.

Sorry, I simply don't believe you are being honest. You can see it. Your brain just pretends not to, because it knows it would short circuit and conflict with what you presently believe.

 

Again: Show me where I have said it eat your lies.

No, I don't vote for them.

Well, I know for a fact that you are a liar, so why should I care what your believe or don't believe.

 

Then you acknowledge the point of this thread?

You should view transgenderism the same as transracialism.

If you believe one of them is nobody else's business, then that applies to both of them, correct?

 

I have a working theory based purely on conjecture and anecdotal evidence.

The anecdotal evidence is based on both stories I've read and people I know in real life, of those men who tend to end up with dibilitating mental illness. They start out with a very active and promiscuous sexlife, probably more so than is 'normal.' As one example, a guy I used to work with who was known for the ability to go to any bar and go home with an attractive woman, and had one of those 'little black books' full of women he could call anytime for a hookup. He also was prone to substance abuse, violence (not against women tho) and going to prison, though you wouldn't know it by working with him until he called in 'arrested'. He killed himself a few years ago, and judging from his 'last text', he was simply tired and bored of life. I dont know for certain, but his own claims and his popularity with women suggest he was also well endowed. Its known that 'size matters' to many women (not all) and men with large members have an easier time getting laid (even if its simply as a result of having more confidense in bed).

My theory is that perhaps when sex comes too easily for a man, life becomes too easy, becomes dull, and its (arguably) most enjoyable part becomes pointless, at least for people whose life is centered around sex.

Maybe, subconsciously, this guy who wants a smaller D just wants life to be more of a challenge? IDK. Its prolly not a great theory... but its the only sense I can make of this.

 

Reese's much less definable than sex. We can determine the sex of dogs and horses.

Sex isn't ambiguous except for in very rare cases or someone that has a birth defect. Race can be very ambiguous you can be mixed race we don't even agree on what race is, it what is a race.

Sure.

I may not have referred to sex in my post but I should have. In this contact gender means nothing. But I would go as far as to say race is ambiguous. We can't decide on what races are or how they're defined.

 

Race doesn't exist.

It's a social construct invented when capitalist slavery happened in Europe.

It's an excuse.

 

If it was invented then it exists. You can say it's based on arbitrary characteristics and to that I would agree. I don't believe it came about in Europe probably dates back further than Mesopotamia.

 

Dude

There are all sorts of weird fetishes in the world including spending hours on the internet railing about the the length of of a Paedophiles sentence

He is not hurting you - he is not hurting me and he is ultimately not hurting anyone but himself

 

Link one example.

 

are you referring to Trump's hand size?

 

You are missing the point.
Should we celebrate and support what he is doing?

How about force a hospital to pay large amounts of money if they refuse to do the surgery?

How about appoint him to some important government position just because of what he did?

 

It was a different world..

"Much of the existence of race can trace its origins to the colonization of the Americas. The categories and meanings of race have changed over time and geography. Suffice it to say, no one was white or black until the colonization process needed ways of differentiating various rights, privileges, social, and legal standings between various laborers. Fifteenth century European countries were not the modern nation states of today, so there was no concept of being “Italian,” for instance. People identified with regional areas, as Calabrese, Genoan, etc. When Europeans did use the term “race” it was employed to talk about tribal groups, such as the “Teutonic races” and while those categories might have been used as indicators of “types” they were by no means seen as limiting or indicative of innate inferiority. Religion and class were the most important divisions, and race as we know it had not been invented."

https://timeline.com/europeans-invented-the-concept-of-race-as-we-know-it-58f896fae625

 

no the idea of race dates back to tribal days so Mesopotamia to claim that all evil started with the beginning of America is idiotic revisionism and can be proven wrong multiple ways