To impeach, or not to impeach: there may be an alternative

I wonder if that excuse works for anyone else

 

Worked for Hillary.

 

Yes I’ve read them I’ve linked them.... apparently you have too so could you be so kind as to link me to the part where it bars him from making a recommendation I see where it bars him from prosecuting the president but I’m not seeing anything prohibiting him from making a recommendation

 

Page 258.

 

Where does it say Mueller can’t give a recommendation to congress?I see where it talks about actually going through with criminal prosecution but still I’m not see the line? Quote which specific line you think barred Mueller from making a definitive recommendation

 

You mean Obstruction of Justice?

How the hell has Barr lied to Congress?

Is this a crime?

Including Ivanka? What the hell has she done?

What the hell has Sanders done?

 

And after Clinton agreed not to fight it and testify voluntarily it was withdrawn.

 

Not YOUR wording nor any wording

What will the Article of Impeachment say? Why are you having such difficulty expressing it?

 

The only really alternative after this hoaxed blew up in the left’s face is to actually govern, but we all know the left has no interest in that.

 

I'm starting to think the Golfer-in-Chief is trying to goad the Dems in to impeachment with his unconstitutional actions ordering that his admin refuse to comply with lawful subpoenas. His thinking seems obvious. More more lawless he becomes the more Trumpists will dig in their heels to support him.

 

Ok

 

For example

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?goto/post&id=1070477366#post-1070477366

I don't know. It's an Impeachable offense.

Search for my chart

Lie to the public

 

I support impeachment.

Screw his base. Neither he nor his base give a sh*t about anyone else. Why should the rest of us care about them? There is more of us than there is of them.

 

That's besides the point.

 

Responded. I repeat: it will say pretty much what the Mueller report says on collusion... for starters. But that's just a small part. Trump's Articles of Impeachment will probably take volumes and months to write. Anybody who wants my wording, I'll be happy to oblige. It would just take a 6 figure salary that starts at least with a 5. I'm not greedy.

 

It's just the facts. Mueller could have subpoena'd Trump, but as he says in the report in the end Trump's testimony was unnecessary since he committed no crime and there was not collusion.

 

The Mueller report is not a Article of Impeachment there is no start in it.

How will the Article 1 of Impeachment read, give me the specifics since you are calling for it.

 

Yeah. And the Sun comes out every day. Just the facts...

The rest of your post is nonsense. You keep confusing Mueller with Barr

 

Where did I say it was?

You should pay attention. Even if you paid attention to the question you asked you wouldn't have made that mistake.

 

How the hell is any of that "collusion?" WHO exactly are you saying is guilty of collision?

 

Well what other "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" are you saying that Trump has committed other than Obstruction of Justice?

What exactly makes refusing to turn over Trump's tax returns an Impeachable offense?

How am I supposed to do that? Is that supposed to be easy? You are normally more than happy to post it wherever you think it helps your argument,
so why not just post it as per normal? Besides, you change the chart like I change underpants! There's about one million versions floating around!

 

The lie in this case is saying that the Mueller Report concluded that there was no collusion given that he didn't even investigate collusion.

 

What the hell gave you the idea that it was supposed to be "easy"?

 

I don't have that idea, but YOU seem to! You told me to "search" for your chart, but how am I supposed to do that? You are normally more than happy to post it wherever you think it helps your argument, so why not just post it as per normal?

Okay... so Mueller didn't investigate collusion, so it didn't report on any collusion. Barr said that the investigation didn't find collusion, so how is that lying exactly? Did he say that Mueller DID investigate collusion? - because THAT would be a lie! Why do you actually care so much that Barr used the wrong word? Conspiracy WAS investigated which is more significant that collusion. Are you suggesting that if collusion WAS investigated, that it would've uncovered something? You seem confused.

 

Did Barr say that the Mueller report DID NOT find that Trump made attempts to interfere with the investigation?