To summarize ....

Discussion in '9/11' started by genericBob, May 30, 2014.

  1. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have entered into discussion here,
    with the idea of making a point, and that point being
    we can clearly see what was done, and that is evidence
    plenty, however people press demands that I explain in detail
    not only what was done, but HOW it was done, not happening.

    We Citizens, were treated to a show on 9/11/2001
    a lot of staged action & special effects, when you see a movie,
    you can tell that certain things are special effects, and its not
    necessary to know HOW it was done, but you can see and
    appreciate what was done.

    Fact is, the mainstream media and our "leaders"
    supported a story that includes radical Islamic hijackers
    flying airliners into buildings and yet, there isn't any PROOF
    of this and the people who support the official story are now
    engaging in psychological warfare to maintain their position,
    because there is no hard evidence to show that suicidal
    hijackers crashed airliners into the WTC or Pentagon.

    When I get badgered & pressed for detail
    and at the same time the others on this forum give answers
    such as "gravity" and all they will say is basically "gravity works"
    What am I to think? To the casual reader of this forum, to the
    "lurkers" if you are sitting on the fence ( still at this late date )
    Please do make an effort to sort out the psychological warfare
    from the REAL data that you need to make up your own mind
    as to what may or may not have happened on 9/11/2001.

    Thank U
    and Good Night .......
     
  2. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    :roll:

    God forbid that you are asked to explain your own thinking and claims. You started to express ideas that stepped into a realm you have no knowledge of whatsoever (structural design and engineering). When people more knowledgeable than you in this area try to explain things that's what you're going to do? Just clam up and refuse to answer? Especially when it gets to complicated for you?

    Typical. I expected nothing less.
     
  3. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    249
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I agree. Here's a link to some of the real datal in case you don't know where to look for it.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=348380&p=1063729867#post1063729867

    Also, don't be taken in by the "No plane" theory. It was thought up by some public relations experts to discredit the truth movement. Real 9/11 truthers believe that robot planes hit the towers.

    "provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A
    (7:20 time mark)

    9/11: The Absurdity of the No-Planes-in-New York Theory
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV4rvTxcMSY

    92 views clockwise attacking WTC 2 (no planes theory debunked)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wtu9r_v-XHE

    THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas (HD) No Planes Theory on 9/11 is Total BS!!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBMOxLkhilU
     
  4. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've personally witnessed the other side in here refusing to answer questions and ignore evidence, and obvious lies via the Kean Commission/Warren Commission style load of propaganda generated from them too so, I guess we're even?
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No,not even....truthersare still the champs at that
     
  6. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You're "evidence" is continually debunked. When will anyone from your side provide mathematics and calculations showing what they think happened was even remotely possible?

    12+ years and nothing.

    Pathetic.
     
  7. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So the Kean camp does it less. That's comforting.
     
  8. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0

    "Debunked", only as far as the other side is concerned? If an honest discussion could be had, perhaps a better outcome could be achieved.
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roll:

    - - - Updated - - -

    'honest discussion' with a bunch of sock puppets?

    Get serious
     
  10. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Another no planer OP with no direction or purpose other than to again show the total willful ignorance of no planers.
     
  11. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "robot planes"...really? Where did all the passengers go? How about the families whose loved one didn't return home that day?...Are they just lying?

    Do you people ever think past your BULSH claims?
     
  12. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "BULSH" funny, U don't look Blueish ......... oh well .......
     
  13. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You guys have had "movements" throughout a 12+ year timeframe. You have had your chances to present math based/calculation based arguments and you've presented nothing at all. Where are all the engineers that support the truthers? Less than 1% of the engineering community in 12+ years.

    Pathetic.
     
  14. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh please. That's just wrong, inaccurate, or just flat out untruthful. The evidence is there, in plain view. Half of the American people smell a rat about 9-11. (The other 50% are slow thinkers).
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Haha. 50% ... you are way off.

    Where is the debate in the worldwide engineering community? The outcries for justice? The papers published?

    Yeah ... there's no movement, unless you count backward as movement.
     
  16. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just a note for the people who say
    its been 12 years for heaven's sake
    why are you still at this,
    and note the history, there was a movement
    started MANY years before women actually
    got the vote, and they had perseverance
    and stuck with the cause because it was right.

    Seek JUSTICE and never give up!
     
  17. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Half the country's population doesn't buy the BS we were fed about 9-11 (and even higher percentages outside the country).
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's a bogus claim....
     
  19. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because you say it is?
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because you back it with NOTHING
     
  21. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because you say so, Boss?
     
  22. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I notice that comments have been disabled for this video, this guy
    doesn't want to know what people think about the video?
    also video of whatever hit the North tower, does not indicate that
    it was for certain a hijacked airliner, what if it was a missile?

    There are all sorts of possibilities here, and to stick with the
    assumption that the only way that the attack could have happened
    was with hijacked airliners is so very limiting.
     
  23. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ignoring the facts is lazy and ignorant.
     
  24. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How about facts like details of how an aircraft would have had to function
    in the act of penetrating the WTC tower wall? The probabilities involved,
    the known facts about aircraft performance and would it be at all possible
    to hit the WTC at 590 mph, ( that bit has NEVER been put to rest, it is still
    a question and will be until some agent of Boeing steps up to actually
    provide INFORMATION ) can an airliner keep its shape while being forced
    to decelerate at >10 g? What about all the luggage/cargo that will break
    loose of whatever is supposed to be holding it in place? ever see a large
    truck with the load shifting?
     
  25. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have been given the mathematical calculations and you were unable to provide anything to refute it. Take the blinders off and really look at the evidence.
     

Share This Page