What? I told you that U2 cameras were long exposure. Do you know what that means? They are not high speed cameras. I posted the type of camera used in the U2 as well as its function. Did you read it? In order to be functional, the camera itself has to change position relative to the object being captured on film. FILM, not digital, or metallic tape. I didn't change any tune, and you obviously didn't pay any attention. Yet more proof that you're not here to have a discussion. You're here to spout off talking point. Does the video at the beginning show a plane moving through 400 ft of space at 500 miles an hour on a security camera from 2001 using a panoramic lens? No? Then you can try again. Are you talking about your posts? I've yet to see any of your posts address the direct questions I've asked you. 1. Exactly what security camera technology should have been employed at the pentagon? 2. How would this technology have defended against high speed aircraft?
Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). You're building your entire case on your disbelief that the Pentagon cameras weren't capable of taking a clear picture of the plane. In the mean time you throw away the following evidence: Flight 77 is missing. A plane hit the Pentagon based on over a hundred eyewitnesses. Several of these witnesses are pilots and identify the plane as a 757. A plane hit the Pentagon based on radar records that ultimately lead all the way back to where ATC lost Flight 77. The flight data recorder for Flight 77 was found in the Pentagon. The remains of the people on board Flight 77 were found and identified through dental records and DNA analysis. In the mean time we have jokers like you pretending the fact the model number and schematics of the camera used by the Pentagon to monitor traffic into and out of the parking lot holds the key as to whether or not said joker can believe the official story. WTF?!? Seriously?
Not at all. Just spotting some similarities in your posts that seem to suggest that you aren't nearly as sincere as you occasionally claim to be. And what does this rant have to do with your angst at not knowing what happened on 9/11? Sounds more like the rantings of a die-hard conspiracy theorist. If that is the case, then no amount of proof that anyone here can provide is going to change your mind. You pretend to be sincere but you are using the same tactics and games that other socks use.
No tapes are missing. This is truther disinfo. All footage was released after the Zacarias Moussaoui trial.
I can only find a few images. Are these tapes out there on the web. Can you help with a link just this one time.
Three tapes actually showed anything. The security camera showed the impact. The other two, one from the citgo and one from the Double Tree, both show the explosion but not the impact. The other videos did not show anything relevant and the tapes were returned to their respective owners.
http://11-settembre.blogspot.com/2007/02/why-dont-pentagon-videos-clearly-show.html I stumbled on a much more comprehensive explanation of 2001 pentagon security video technology.
THIS is the funniest 9/11 CONSPIRACY THEORY EVER. Truthers have debunked it countless number of times and the OCTAS can only sling crap in defeat knowing thats true.lol. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...-11-official-conspiracy-theory-5-minutes.html
