Trial for five men charged with planning 9/11 to start in 2021, 20 years after attack

Lets get history right, no more revisionist history. the mastermind of 9/11 was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) not Osama bin Laden.

The mastermind of 9/11 was captured in 2003 during the Bush administration.

The CIA waterboarded the mastermind of 9/11 and bleeding heart liberals, and even some RINO's got their panties all wadded up in a bunch.

The Bush administration had five years to bring KSM to trial.
Obama had eight years to bring KSM to trial.
Both failed to do so.

Looks like the Trump administration will be bringing the mastermind of 9/11 KSM to trial.

Who is the mastermind of 9/11, KSM ? -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_Sheikh_Mohammed

Well KSM looks like a famous American porn star, Ron Jeremy.

On the left Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, on the right Ron Jeremy

 

Yes, their case is so damn solid that it took only 17 years to prove it.

Truth is stranger than fiction.

 

If I remember correctly the Obama administration wanted to have KSM tried in federal court in New York City so KSM would access to liberal lawyers, the ACLU and CNN studios.

I still can't understand why the PC left and a few RINO's had a meltdown when the CIA waterboarded KSM.

 

It's really tough to have an intelligent conversation with one who still believes the official 911 narrative.

 

Most don't even know when OBL declared war on America and why he did.

President Clinton sure never did and OBL declared war on America because he knew Clinton was a pantywaist.

Unfortunately OBL didn't know that who would be POTUS in September of 2001 wasn't a pantywaist.

In the name of Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden declared war on America in August of 1996.

What was the Clinton administration reaction, Al Qaeda wasn't a national security issue but a law enforcement issue.

 

And impossible to have an intelligent conversation with someone who buys into conspiracy theories

 

Let’s just hope Ilhan Omar does not end up on the jury.

 

The similarity is hilarious .. very good points with respect to why this dude was not brought to trial sooner. Did you have any comments on why you think this is ?

 

Bin Laden declared war on the U.S. after Desert Storm claiming that America invaded Holy Land. We knew about Al Qaeda in '93 but Clinton was too busy playing Hide the Cigar with Monica to be diligent in protecting the U.S.

The 1993 World Trade Center bombing was a terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, carried out on February 26, 1993, when a truck bomb detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. The 1,336 lb (606 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device was intended to send the North Tower (Tower 1) crashing into the South Tower (Tower 2), bringing both towers down and killing tens of thousands of people. It failed to do so but killed six people and injured over a thousand.

The attack was planned by a group of terrorists including Ramzi Yousef, Mahmud Abouhalima, Mohammad Salameh, Nidal A. Ayyad, Abdul Rahman Yasin, and Ahmed Ajaj. They received financing from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Yousef's uncle.

 

Oh, i dunno, could it be because confessions extracted by torture are whatever the torturer wants to hear?. If all you have on KSM is a confession that was waterboarded you have nothing

But Trump has decided to kill one more person to make his base happy

 

What led to OBL thinking he could get away attacking America on its own soil was President Clinton inactions in Somalia like pulling America troops out after Americans were killed and Clinton's inactions with dealing with Saddam Hussein after Iraq's attempted assassination of G.H. Bush (41) and Iraq violated the no fly zone over a hundred times.

When the U.S. Army requested armor to support the Army in Mogadishu, Clinton said no.
If the Army would have had armor on the ground, no "Black Hawk Down" would have happened.

OBL looked upon Clinton as a pantywaist and believed that America had become a paper tiger.

So OBL decided to attack America on its own soil believing that whoever was President at the time only response would be the launching of a hundred Tomahawk cruise missiles.

What OBL didn't know was that G.W. Bush was no pantywaist and his response to 9/11 would be putting American boots on the ground in Afghanistan.

No reason to go further but let's say G.W. Bush ****ed up by listening to liberal PC JAG lawyers that allowed OBL to escape into Pakistan.

If you listened to the interview with General "Mad Dog" Mattis on Sunday he pointed that out and not surprising he wanted to do the same thing I would have done in I was in charge back in 2001.

Establish a blocking force near the Pakistan border in the Tora Bora mountains and sending either the 5th or 7th Marines Regiment up the Tora Bora valley.

It worked in Vietnam, why not in Afghanistan ?

 

The other day someone pointed out that in Bush's second term in the White House the Democrats no longer wanted to fight a war against terrorist, Al Qaeda or other Islamist jihadist.
(The Democrats did the same thing in 1968 during the Vietnam War.)
(The Democrats did the same thing in 1973 and didn't want to fight the Cold War.)

If KSM is found guilty and given the death sentence I'm sure the California Attorney General will file a lawsuit to stop the execution of the biggest mass murder during the 21st Century.

 

Do you even know what they have on him?

 

Part of the delay was extraction of information, but even that shouldn't have taken long. The other is the fear that it would make a martyr of him. Certainly if we weren't ideologically corrupted by the leftist media university apparatus concept of modern Crime and Punishment the Real Men would have used the traditional methods of Longshanks!

 

No, I am just saying that evidence extracted by torture is invalid. Many conservatives here seem to think it not only truthful but praiseworthy

 

Says the guy whose profile name pays homage to the Lenin family. Founders of the most torturous bloodthirsty regime in history. Great Irony.

 

I don't think we know for sure weather or not Bin Laden was responsible for 911.

Right after the attacks Bin Laden claimed he did not even know about it beforehand.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/did-o...the-9-11-attacks-and-did-he-die-in-2001/18923

 

It was all about the US parking military on sacred ground when we was gonna invade Kuwait and take it back from Hussein..

 

Everyone who talks with a conspiracy nut should be getting an extra tax credit for emotional support.

 

Can you link us to how they gained whatever info they have? So he was waterboarded, to bad it was not real torture.

 

Completely agree. I remember Carter's inactions against Iran back in '79. For a year and a half we were the laughing stock of the world. Allowing terrorist to invade American soil and kidnap 53 Americans for 444 days. Oh, we did tie yellow ribbons around our car antennas to show support for the hostages. Was it irony that Iran released all the hostages the day after Reagan was sworn in? No, it was fear.

 

Official theory contradicts the laws of physics, conspiracy theories are spread around for the sole purpose not to mislead the public and not to conduct real investigation of 911 events.

 

Bovine excrement.

 

You are deluded. While I didn't support (and don't) the taking over of the US embassy, lets be clear on the facts: the deal to release the hostage was negotiated and completed during the Carter administration. It was a complicated deal involving a host of transactions, including setting up a mechanism for release of billions of dollars in Iranian money held by the US and the establishment of an arbitration tribunal (the Iran-US Claims Tribunal) to handle financial claims between the two parties. The release of the hostages was delayed by some hours by Iran, not advanced, to allow it to coincide with exactly when Reagan took office. This was done as a means to further embarrass Jimmy Carter, who was at the time seen by the hostage-takers as the face of America they were fighting.

Otherwise, lets us be clear: no American president has presided over as many ignominious acts against the US perpetuated by Iran and Iranian backed groups as Ronald Reagan. I don't want to feed into the anti-Iran frenzy by recalling the events from those years, from a low-level war that was fought in Lebanon and ended up in Iran's favor (Iran that was ultimately on the right side of that fight, even if its tactics to win that fight weren't always so honorable and great). But while America has committed even greater acts of terror, mayhem and violence against Iran than vice versa, here are just a few examples I give to you to disabuse you of this notion that anyone in Iran was all that afraid of Ronald Reagan!



How did Reagan respond? He ordered American marines out of Lebanon. And then invaded Grenada!

Or take this:

How did Reagan respond to this and the spate of hostages taken in Lebanon? He sent an emissary to Iran, his national security adviser Bob McFarlane (who wasn't even received at the airport), with a plane load of anti-tank missiles, a cake and a Bible in an operation that later became known as the "Iran-Contra Affair".